Advertisement

Impact and Applicability of the Affective Feedback

  • Samantha Jiménez
  • Reyes Juárez-Ramírez
  • Víctor H. Castillo
  • Juan José Tapia Armenta
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

Based on the empirical results of the previous chapter as well as on the theoretical argument of the first part of this book exposed at Chap. 2, the current chapter will highlight implications for theory as well as for practice. First, implications for the scientific community and contributions to the existing knowledge. Second, the chapter describes the benefits for society, educational institutes, and students. After that, the chapter will focus on describing the limitations of the proposal.

References

  1. 1.
    Wolfe, C.R., Widmer, C.L., Reyna, V.F., Hu, X., Cedillos, E.M., Fisher, C.R., Brust-Renck, P.G., Williams, T.C., Damas Vannucchi, I., Weil, A.M.: The development and analysis of tutorial dialogues in AutoTutor Lite. Behav. Res. Methods 45(3), 623–36 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0352-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barón-Estrada, M.L., Zatarain-Cabada, R., Zatarain-Cabada, R., Barrón-Estrada, A.: Design and implementation of an affective ITS. Res. Comput. Sci. 56, 60–68, August 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lei, H., Cui, Y., Chiu, M.M.: Affective teacher-student relationships and students’ externalizing behavior problems: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 7 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01311
  4. 4.
    Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Mellish, C.: Towards a model of personality, affective state, feedback and learner motivation. CEUR Workshop Proc. 872, 17–22 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibrahimoglu, N., Unaldi, I., Samancioglu, M., Baglibel, M.: The relationship between personality traits and learning styles: a cluster analysis. In: Leena and Luna International, vol. 2. Oyama, Japan (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Letzring, T.D., Adamcik, L.A.: Personality traits and affective states: relationships with and without affect induction. Pers. Individ. Diff. 75, 114–120 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Mellish, C.: Adapting progress feedback and emotional support to learner personality. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(3), 877–931 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0059-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiménez, S., Juárez-Ramírez, R., Castillo, V.H., Licea, G., Ramírez-Noriega, A., Inzunza, S.: A feedback system to provide affective support to students. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 1(December 2017), 1 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21900
  9. 9.
    Duffy, M.C., Azevedo, R.: Motivation matters: interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 338–348 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van der Meij, H., Van der Meij, J., Harmsen, R.: Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Educ. Technol. Res. Devel. 63(3), 381–403 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9378-5
  11. 11.
    Carlotto, T., Jaques, P.A.: The effects of animated pedagogical agents in an English-as-a-foreign-language learning environment. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 95(1), 15–26 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Creswell, J.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crouch, M., MacKenzie, H.: The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Soc. Sci. Inf. 45(4), 24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Latham, J.: A framework for leading the transformation to performance excellence part I: CEO perspectives on forces, facilitators, and strategic leadership systems. Qual. Manag. J. 2(20), 22 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caine, K.: Local standards for sample size at CHI. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 981–992 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498
  16. 16.
    Gelbukh, A., Sidorov, G.: Comparación de los coeficientes de las leyes de Zipf y Heaps en diferentes idiomas. In: Procesamiento automático del español con enfoque en recursos léxicos grandes, pp. 1–255. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha Jiménez
    • 1
  • Reyes Juárez-Ramírez
    • 1
  • Víctor H. Castillo
    • 2
  • Juan José Tapia Armenta
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaTijuanaMexico
  2. 2.Universidad de ColimaColimaMexico
  3. 3.CITEDIInstituto Politécnico NacionalTijuanaMexico

Personalised recommendations