Sense Making: The Process of Data Analysis and Interpretation
In this chapter you will be led step-by-step in how to analyze the data generated in the research process. The focus is on how to organize a group process to make sense out of the data, taking into account various data forms and the different competencies and skills of the various participants and community members. Principles to guide the quality of sense making are presented, with a focus on maintaining a critical stance and a high level of participation in the process.
To guide you in making sense of the data from a participatory research project together with the local research team.
How do we make sense of the generated data within a participatory process?
KeywordsData analysis Being critical Data interpretation Quality criteria
Further Reading and Sources of Inspiration
- Labonte, R., & Feather, J. (1996). Handbook in using story dialogue in health promotion practice. Available at: www.icphr.org
- Blackman, A., & Fairey, T. (2007). The photovoice manual. A guide to designing and running participatory photography projects. London: PhotoVoice.Google Scholar
- Boal, A. (1993). Theatre of the oppressed paperback. New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
- Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brinton Lykes, M. (2001). Creative arts and photography in participative action research in Guatamala. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Action research: Participatory enquiry and practice (pp. 363–371). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dias, S., & Gama, A. (2014). Community-based participatory research in public health: Potentials and challenges. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 35(2), 150–154.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
- Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
- International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2017). Quality criteria for participatory health research. Berlin: ICPHR. http://www.icphr.org/uploads/2/0/3/9/20399575/qualtiy_criteria_for_participatory_health_research_-_cook_-_version_15_08_21__1_.pdf
- Labonte, R., & Feather, J. (1996). Handbook in using story dialgoue in health promotion practice. Available at: www.icphr.org
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- PhotoVoice. (2017). Internet site of the photovoice charity. London. www.photovoice.org
- The World Café Community Foundation. (2017). Internet site of the foundation. www.theworldcafe.com
- Wang, C. (2003). Using photovoice as a participatory assessment and issue selection tool. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 179–196). San Francisco: JoseyBas.Google Scholar
- Wicks, P. G., Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2013). Living inquiry: Personal, political and philosophical groundings for action research practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Widdershoven, G. A. M., & Abma, T. A. (2007). Hermeneutic ethics between practice and theory. In R. E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper, & J. R. McMillan (Eds.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 215–222). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar