Acting for Change: The Generation of Transformative Action

  • Tineke Abma
  • Sarah Banks
  • Tina Cook
  • Sónia Dias
  • Wendy Madsen
  • Jane Springett
  • Michael T. Wright

Chapter Summary


Participatory Research is orientated towards change. This chapter explores the types of actions that generate change in the research process both during and after a research project has finished. It covers the conditions that need to be nurtured to encourage action and some of the impediments to that action.


Developing insights into understanding types of change and change processes.

Central Question

When does action and change take place and what types of action can we expect?


Activism Change Capacity building Levels of change Voice The unanticipated 


  1. Abma, T.A. (2018) Dialogue and deliberation, new approaches to the inclusion of patients in research agenda setting, action research. Feb. 26, 2018.
  2. Abma, T.A., & Baur, V. (2014) User involvement in long-term care. Toward a care ethics approach. Health Expectations, 27 April 2014. DOI: Scholar
  3. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, T., & Claxton, G. (Eds.). (2000). The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baum, F., Lawless, A., Delany, T., Macdougall, C., Williams, C., Broderick, D., Wildgoose, D., Harris, E., Mcdermott, D., Kickbusch, I., Popay, J., & Marmot, M. (2014). Evaluation of health in all policies: Concept, theory and application. Health Promotion International, 29(suppl_1), i130–i142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baur, V., & Abma, T. A. (2012). “The Taste Buddies.” Participation and empowerment in a residential home for older people. Aging & Society, 32(6), 1055–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, J. (2007). Linking participatory research to action: Institutional challenges. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge (206–215).Google Scholar
  9. Chatterton, P., Fuller, D., & Routledge, P. (2007). Relating action to activism: Theoretical and methodological reflections. In P. Kindon, R. Pain, & Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge (216–222).Google Scholar
  10. Christens, B. D. (2012) Toward relational empowerment. Am. J. Community Psych. Online: 18 Nov 2011. Doi: 10/1007/s10464-011-9483-5.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, T. (2006). Collaborative action research within developmental evaluation: Learning to see or the road to myopia? Evaluation, 12(4), 418–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, T. (2009). The purpose of mess in action research: Building rigour though a messy turn. Educational Action Research, 17(2), 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fals-Borda, O. (1988). Knowledge and people’s power: Lessons with peasants in Nicaragua, Mexico and Colombia. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Fals-Borda, O. (2006). The North-South convergence: A 30-year first-person assessment of PAR. Action Research, 4(3), 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization. A history of insanity in the age of reason. (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Pantheon (Original work published in 1961).Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception. (A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.) New York: Pantheon. (Original work published in 1963).Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. (Ed.). (1997). Mentoring the mentor: A critical dialogue with Paulo Freire (Vol. 60). Peter Lang Pub Incorporated.Google Scholar
  18. Freire, P. (2001). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers..Google Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (2010). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Gergen, K. J. (2003). Action research and orders of democracy. Action Research, 1(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S., & Janamian, T. (2016). Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), 392–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gubrium, A., Harper, K., & Otañez, M. (Eds.). (2016). Participatory visual and digital research in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, J. (1977). Volume 2: Life world and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, B. (2012). Whose knowledge counts? The emerging knowledge democracy movement. Practice in Participation. Retrieved from:\guestcolumn\category\budd-hall. Accessed 9 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  26. Hyung Hur, M. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(5), 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. In “t Veld, R. (2010). Knowledge democracy. Consequences for science, politics and media. Heidelberg/Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013). Position Paper 1: What is Participatory Health Research? Editorial Group: Michael T. Wright, Germany (lead); Irma Brito, Portugal; Tina Cook, UK; Janet Harris, UK; Maria Elisabeth Kleba, Brazil; Wendy Madsen, Australia; Jane Springett, Canada; Tom Wakeford, UK
  29. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2018). Position Paper 3: What is Impact in Participatory Health Research? Editorial Group: Tina Cook. UK (lead), Tineke Abma, Netherlands, Tanja Gangarova, Germany, Lisa Gibb, Australia, Janet Harris, UK, Siobhan O’Higgins Ireland, Elizabet Kelba, Brazil, Susanne Kuempers, Germany, Anne McFarlane, Ireland, John Oetze, New Zealand, Sebastian von Peter, Germany, Brenda Roche, Canada, Payam Sheikhattari, USA, Ina Schaefer, Germany, Amy Schultz, USA, Jane Springett, Canada, Nina Wallerstein, USA, Michael Wright, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansson, Y. (2011). Tensions in the field of health care: knowledge networks and evidence-based practice: an action research approach (Doctoral dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University).Google Scholar
  31. Kendall, E., Sunderland, N., Barnett, L., Nalder, G., & Matthews, C. (2011). Beyond the rhetoric of participatory research in indigenous communities: Advances in Australia over the last decade. Qualitative Health Research, 21(12), 1719–1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerr, S., Penney, L., Moewaka Barnes, H., & McCreanor, T. (2010). Kaupapa Maori action research to improve heart disease services in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Ethnicity & Health, 15(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lather, P. (1986a). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lather, P. (1986b). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laycock, A., Walker, D., Harrison, N., & Brands, J. (2011). Researching indigenous health. A practical guide for researchers. Melbourne: The Lowitja Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Ledwith, M., & Springett, J. (2010). Participatory practice. Participatory practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  37. MacLaren, D., Asugeni, J., Redman-MacLaren, M., & Atoifi Health Research Group. (2015). Strengthening research capacity in the Pacific: An example from the Atoifi Health Research Group, Solomon Islands. Australasian Psychiatry, 23(6_suppl), 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McLaren, P. (2006). Radical pedagogy: Postcolonial politics in a postmodern world. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munn-Giddings, C., & Cook, T. (2016). Editorial concluding thoughts: Virtual Issue on the theme of “creative expression” in action research. Educational Action Research
  42. Pain, R., Askins, K., Banks, S., Cook, T., Crawford, G., Crookes, L., Darby, S., Heslop, J., Holden, A., Houston, M., Jeffes, J., Lambert, Z., McGlen, L., McGlynn, C., Ozga, J., Raynor, R., Robinson, Y., Shaw, S., Stewart, C., & Vanderhoven, D. (2015). Mapping alternative impact: Alternative approaches to impact from co-produced research. Produced as part of the N8/ESRC Research Programme Knowledge that Matters: Realising the Potential of Co-Production.
  43. Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 795–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simon, B. L. (1990). Rethinking empowerment. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 1(1), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solnit, R. (2016). Hope in the dark, untold histories, wild possibilities. Edinburgh: Canongate Books.Google Scholar
  46. Sprague, J., & Hayes, J. (2000). Self-determination and empowerment: A feminist standpoint analysis of talk about disability. American Journal of Community Psychology., 28(5), 671–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tappan, M. B. (2006). Reframing internalized oppression and internalized domination: From the psychological to the sociocultural. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2115–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Torbert, W. (2013). Listening into the dark: Essay testing the validity and efficacy of Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry for describing and encouraging the transformation of self, society, and scientific inquiry. Integral Review, 9(20), 264–299.Google Scholar
  49. Torre, M. E., & Fine, M. (2007). Theorizing audience, products and provocation. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is participatory action research. Action Research International. Available. Online:
  51. Walkers, M. (2009). Capabilities, flourishing and the normative purposes of action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 301–312). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Washbourn, R. (2016). Deepening understandings of rehabilitation in the Cook Islands: An action research study with Te Vaerua Rehabilitation Service (Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago).Google Scholar
  53. Wicks, P. G., Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2013). Living inquiry: Personal, political and philosophical groundings for action research practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tineke Abma
    • 1
  • Sarah Banks
    • 2
  • Tina Cook
    • 3
  • Sónia Dias
    • 4
  • Wendy Madsen
    • 5
  • Jane Springett
    • 6
  • Michael T. Wright
    • 7
  1. 1.Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVU University Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of SociologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  3. 3.Department of Disability and EducationLiverpool Hope UniversityLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.National School of Public HealthUniversidade Nova LisboaLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.School of Health, Medical & Applied SciencesCentral Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia
  6. 6.Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public HealthUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  7. 7.Institute for Social HealthCatholic University of Applied SciencesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations