• Jonathan Fardy


This chapter explicates the core “clones” of non-photography. It examines non-photography’s critique of the photographic myth of photography; the status of photographic images in relation to the Real; the “stance” of non-photography; Laruelle’s “science” of photography, and finally Laruelle’s non-photographic ethics of human universality.


Non-photography Science Photographic stance Vision-force Quantum Fractal Humanity Victims 


  1. Azoulay, Ariella. The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. James, Ian. The New French Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Laruelle, François. Intellectuals and Power: The Insurrection of the Victim: François Laruelle in Conversation with Philippe Petit. Translated by Anthony Paul Smith. Cambridge: Polity, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. ———. Photo-Fiction, a Non-Standard Aesthetics. Translated by Drew S. Burk. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. ———. The Concept of Non-Photography. Translated by Robin Mackay. New York: Urbanomic/Sequence Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Long, J.J., Andrea Noble, and Edward Welch, eds. Photography: Theoretical Snapshots. New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Plotnitsky, Arkady. Complementarity: Anti-Epistemology after Bohr and Derrida. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Fardy
    • 1
  1. 1.Idaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA

Personalised recommendations