Advertisement

“So We Only Have One We Share with More, and Then They Have Way More and They Share with Less”: Mathematics and Spatial Justice

  • Laurie H. Rubel
  • Vivian Y. Lim
  • Maren Hall-Wieckert
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

This chapter investigates student learning in the context of a module about a city’s two-tiered financial system of banks and alternative financial institutions (i.e., pawnshops), held in ten sessions in a high school advisory class led by a mathematics teacher. The module exemplifies teaching mathematics for spatial justice, by extending teaching mathematics for social justice (Gutstein, 2006) with the idea that place matters (Gruenewald, 2003) and that justice has a geography (Soja, 2010). In this module, students use the concepts of percent to mathematize the costs of loans, and they analyze intensive variables to investigate spatial data about the density of these categories of institutions across their city. Spatial data is presented with GIS maps, layerable with demographic data and locations of financial institutions. The spatial distribution of the financial institutions reflects the inequalities of the spatial patterns in the city’s social demographics. Contextualized in the disparity of interest rates across these financial institutions, the spatial pattern not only reflects but reinforces those social inequalities. This chapter presents findings from one round of piloting and pursues the question: How did the module’s spatial justice orientation support the development of conceptual understanding of percent and ratio? Analysis focuses on growth with respect to mathematical understanding of percent and learning in class sessions organized around the use of ratios to understand the distribution. Findings include student adoption of strategies indicative of conceptual understandings of percent and development of critical opinions about their city’s two-tiered personal lending system.

Keywords

Mathematics education Critical mathematics Critical geography Youth geography Spatial justice High school education Cartography Mapping Participatory mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation [NSF] under Grant No. DRL-1222430. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. We acknowledge the significant contributions of MIT’s Civic Data Design Lab in the design of the digital maps and mapping tools described in this manuscript. This research would not have been possible without the generosity of time and spirit of teachers and students from the New York City Department of Education. This material extends findings presented in conference papers presented at Psychology of Mathematics Education North America in 2015 and 2016.

References

  1. Apple, M. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brantlinger, A. (2005). The geometry of inequality. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethink-ing mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 97–100). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  3. City Digits. (2013). http://www.citydigits.org.
  4. Dole, S. (2000). Promoting percent as a proportion in eighth-grade mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), 380–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edelson, D. (2011, Spring). Scaling up classroom maps: “Geo learning”. Arcnews. Retrieved from www.esri.com/news/arcnews/spring11articles/
  6. Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don’t know nothing I didn’t know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  8. Ginsburg, L., Gal, I., & Schuh, A. (1995). What does “100% juice” mean? Exploring adult learners’ informal knowledge of percent (Tech. Rep. No. TR95-17). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, National Center on Adult Literacy.Google Scholar
  9. Goodchild, M. F., & Lam, N. S. (1980). Areal interpolation: A variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing, 1, 297–312.Google Scholar
  10. Gruenewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious eduction. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.Google Scholar
  11. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Haubner, M. A. (1992). Percents: Developing meaning through models. Arithmetic Teacher, 40(4), 232–234.Google Scholar
  14. Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children’s thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawvere, F. W. (1992). Categories of space and of quantity. In J. Echeverria, A. Ibarra, & T. Mormann (Eds.), The space of mathematics: Philosophical, epistemological, and historical explorations (pp. 14–30). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Lembke, L. O., & Reys, B. J. (1994). The development of, and interaction between, intuitive and school-taught ideas about percent. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leonard, J., Brooks, W., Barnes-Johnson, J., & Berry, R. Q., III. (2010). The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  19. Lim, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2006). Science learning and a sense of place in an urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim, V. Y. (2016). Making change with mathematics: Youth conceptions of the role of mathe-matics in citizenship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  21. Lo, J., & Ko, Y. (2013). A bargain price for teaching about percentage. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(2), 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Middleton, J., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1995). The ratio table. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 1(4), 282–288.Google Scholar
  23. Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.Google Scholar
  25. Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Remillard, J., Ebby, C., Lim, V., Reinke, L., Hoe, N., & Magee, E. (2014). Increasing access to mathematics through locally relevant curriculum. In K. Karp (Ed.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education: Using research to improve instruction (pp. 89–96). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  27. Root, R. (2009). Social justice through quantitative literacy: A course connecting numeracy, engaged citizenship, and a just society. Democracy & Education, 18(3), 37–43.Google Scholar
  28. Rubel, L. H., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Lim, V. Y. (2016). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: Beyond a victory narrative. Harvard Educational Review, 86(4), 556–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rubel, L., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Lim, V. (2017). Making space for place: The role of mapping tools inlearning as political formation. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26(4), 643-687Google Scholar
  30. Rubel, L. H., Lim, V. Y., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Katz, S. R. (2016). Cash across the city: Participatory mapping & teaching for spatial justice. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, & Research, 12, 4–14.Google Scholar
  31. Rubel, L. H., Lim, V. Y., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Sullivan, M. (2016). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: An investigation of the lottery. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Servon, L. (2013, October 29). The high cost, for the poor, of using a bank. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com
  33. Slocum, T. (1998). Thematic cartography and visualization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-) understand science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  36. Streefland, L. (1985). Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Techsmith. (2010). Camtasia for Mac [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.techsmith.com/video-editor.html
  38. Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Turner, E. E. (2012). Critical mathematical agency in the overcrowding at Francis middle school project. In A. Barton, E. Tan, E. Turner, & M. V. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools (pp. 51–76). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiebe, J. (1986). Manipulating percentages. Mathematics Teacher, 79(1), 23–26.Google Scholar
  42. Wilkerson-Jerde, M., & Laina, V. (2015). Stories of our city: Coordinating youths’ mathematical, representational, and community knowledge through data visualization design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie H. Rubel
    • 1
  • Vivian Y. Lim
    • 2
  • Maren Hall-Wieckert
    • 1
  1. 1.Brooklyn CollegeCity University of New YorkBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.Stella and Charles Guttman Community CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations