Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Setting of Bowel Injury/Resection

  • Garth R. JacobsenEmail author
  • Jessica L. Reynolds


The use of permanent synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias is considered standard of care regardless of whether a laparoscopic or open approach is used. These prosthetics are responsible for a profound reduction in the recurrence rates of inguinal hernia repairs. There are many situations in which the utilization of mesh is considered standard of care, but there are several which warrant further discussion. In particular the utilization of meshes in contaminated fields can lead to higher rates of wound morbidity. One such situation which may lead to contamination is concomitant bowel injury or the need for resection of the bowel. This manuscript seeks to tackle this difficult situation and provide suggestions for clinical management.


Hernia Mesh Contamination Bowel injury 


  1. 1.
    Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Critical scrutiny of the open "tension-free" hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1993;165:369–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias: results of 3,019 operations from five diverse surgical sources. Am Surg. 1992;58:255–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carbonell AM, Cobb WS. Safety of prosthetic mesh hernia repair in contaminated fields. Surg Clin N Am. 2013;93:1227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:991–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelly ME, Behrman SW. The safety and efficacy of prosthetic hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. Am Surg. 2002;68:524–8; discussion 528-529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Souza JM, Dumanian GA. Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery. 2013;153:393–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hentati H, Dougaz W, Dziri C. Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for strangulated inguinal hernia: systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014;38:2784–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bessa SS, Abdel-fattah MR, Al-Sayes IA, Korayem IT. Results of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated groin hernias: a 10-year study. Hernia: J Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2015;19:909–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations