Advertisement

Clinical Decision Analysis

  • Sadeesh K. Srinathan
  • Feng Xie
Chapter
Part of the Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach book series (DDSURGERY)

Abstract

Clinical decisions are often difficult as we try to balance the benefits or harms of one decision pathway compared to another possible pathway. Further, this has to be done in the face of incomplete information. In this chapter we describe a useful tool termed Clinical Decision Analysis to allow for a transparent and explicit description of the decision making process to guide us in identifying areas of uncertainty around the existing evidence.

Keywords

EBM Evidence based medicine GRADE Bias Study design Systematic reviews Trials 

References

  1. 1.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185(4157):1124–31.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, Frazier HS, Neuhauser D, Netura R, McNeil BJ. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brunaud L, Kebebew E, Sebag F, Zarnegar R, Clark OH, Duh Q-Y. Observation or laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma? A surgical decision analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12(9):CR355–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neumann I, Akl EA, Vandvik PO, Agoritsas T, Alonso-Coello P, Rind DM, et al. In: Guyatt G, Meade MO, Rennie D, Cook DJ, editors. Users’ guides to the medical literature. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Department of SurgeryUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health SciencesMcMaster University, St. Joseph’s HospitalHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations