Toward a Comparative Political Economy of Reactive States

  • Mustafa Kutlay
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


Kutlay offers a comparative analysis of the Turkish and Greek cases with particular reference to three-stage framework. Chapter 7 lays out the main findings of the present book. Accordingly, in-depth analysis of four episodes in two reactive states puts the parts of the conceptual framework together. Main findings advance the debate on reform dynamics in reactive states, on the centrality of crisis narratives approach in explaining the divergence of post-crisis outcomes, and on the role of policy entrepreneurs in instigating paradigmatic changes in the aftermath of economic crises.


  1. Alderman, Liz and Jack Ewing. “Most Aid to Athens Circles Back to Europe.” New York Times, May 29, 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Bakır, Caner. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change: Multilevel Governance of Central Banking Reform.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 22, no. 4 (2009): 571–598.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Ulrich. German Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul ‘t Hart. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. Donnelly, Shawn. “Power Politics and the Undersupply of Financial Stability in Europe.” Review of International Political Economy 21, no. 4 (2014): 980–1005.Google Scholar
  6. Drazen, Allan, and William Easterly. “Do Crises Induce Reform? Simple Empirical Tests of Conventional Wisdom.” Economics and Politics 13, no. 2 (2001): 129–157.Google Scholar
  7. Duman, Özgün Sarımehmet. The Political Economy of Labour Market Reforms: Greece, Turkey and the Global Economic Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. Fouskas, Vassilis K., and Constantine Dimoulas. Greece, Financialization, and the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Gambarotto, Francesca, and Stefano Solari. “The Peripheralization of Southern European Capitalism within the EMU.” Review of International Political Economy, ifirst version (2014): 1–25.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, Peter A. “The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis.” German Politics 21, no. 4 (2012): 355–371.Google Scholar
  11. Keyman, E. Fuat, and Ahmet İçduygu. “Introduction: Citizenship, Identity, and the Question of Democracy in Turkey.” In Citizenship in a Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences, edited by E. Fuat Keyman, and Ahmet İçduygu, 1–28. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Kohli, Atul, Peter Evans, Peter J. Katzenstein, Adam Przeworski, Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, James C. Scott, and Theda Skocpol. “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium.” World Politics 48, no. 1 (1995): 1–49.Google Scholar
  14. Lavdas, Kostas A., Spyridon N. Litsas, and Dimitrios V. Skiadas. Stateness and Sovereign Debt: Greece in the European Conundrum. New York: Lexington Books, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24, no. 2 (1999): 5–55.Google Scholar
  16. Matthijs, Matthias. “Mediterranean Blues: The Crisis in Southern Europe.” Journal of Democracy 25, no. 1 (2014): 101–115.Google Scholar
  17. Nehru, Jawaharlal. Jawaharlal Nehru's Speeches 19491953. New Delhi: The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1954.Google Scholar
  18. Öniş, Ziya, and Fikret Şenses. “Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and Reactive State: Major Policy Shifts in Post-War Turkish Economic Development.” METU Studies in Development, no. 34 (2007): 251–286.Google Scholar
  19. Pop, Valentina. “Merkel Under Fire for ‘Lazy Greeks’ Comment.” EUobserver, May 19, 2011.Google Scholar
  20. Rodrik, Dani. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXIV (1996): 9–41.Google Scholar
  21. Simonazzi, Annamaria, Andrea Ginzburg, and Gianluigi Nocella. “Economic Relations between Germany and the Southern Europe.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37, no. 3 (2013): 653–675.Google Scholar
  22. Tommasia, Mariano, and Andrés Velascoa. “Where are we in the Political Economy of Reform.” The Journal of Policy Reform 1, no. 2 (1996): 187–238.Google Scholar
  23. Ünay, Sadık. Neoliberal Globalization and Institutional Reform: The Political Economy of Development Planning in Turkey. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. Watkins, Susan. “Another Turn of the Screw.” New Left Review, no. 75 (2012): 5–13.Google Scholar
  25. Weiss, Linda. “The State in the Economy: Neoliberal or Neoactivist?” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, edited by Glenn Morgan, John Campbell, Colin Crouch, Ove Kai Pedersen, and Richard Whitley, 183–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Zahariadis, Nikolaos. “The Multiple Streams Framework: Structures, Limitations, Prospects.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 65–92. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Kutlay
    • 1
  1. 1.City University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations