Advertisement

Empirical Research Methodology

  • Gaiyan Wang
Chapter

Abstract

To empirically test the effect of the pedagogical intervention, a randomized pretest-posttest design with one experimental group and two control groups was adopted. Instruction was conducted following the CLIC instructional model, which involves two steps: inform the learners of the nature of the lexical meaning they should seek, and teach them how to infer lexical meanings.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cobb, T. Web Vocabprofile.http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/. Accessed July 2013. An adaptation of Heatley and Nation’s (1994) Range.
  4. Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 368–294.Google Scholar
  6. He, Q., et al. (2000). National education curriculum for University English majors. Beijing: National Education Department.Google Scholar
  7. Heatley, A., Nation, P., & Coxhead, A. (1994). Range. Victoria University of Wellington. Computer program. http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/
  8. Hirsch, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689–696.Google Scholar
  9. Qian, D. (2005). Demystifying lexical inferencing: The role of aspects of vocabulary knowledge. TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rapaport, W. J., & Kibby, M. W. (2005). In defense of contextual vocabulary acquisition. Modeling and using context (pp. 396–409). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Rastle, H., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358, 534 non-words: The ARC nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55 A(4), 1339–1362.Google Scholar
  12. Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 209–227). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaiyan Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of English StudiesXi’an International Studies UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations