Advertisement

Reputation Management Revisited: U.S. Universities Presenting Themselves Online

  • S. Gabriela Gavrila
  • Francisco O. Ramirez
Chapter
Part of the Public Sector Organizations book series (PSO)

Abstract

This chapter examines how American universities make use of reputation management on their websites. It replicates a design piloted with Nordic universities, employing similar methodology (“web census”) and indicators. Universities often make strategic decisions about which aspects of institutional identity to emphasize in order to maintain legitimacy (“survive”) or gain competitive advantage (“thrive”). This study analyzes six online dimensions (history, strategic planning, research, academics, internal, and external environment) for a nationally-representative sample of 124 universities versus a subset of 28 elite universities. The findings reveal key differences, with a considerable gap on one dimension (research) and a surprising inversion on another (strategic planning). Furthermore, decoupling can occur between universities’ online presence and their performance, which is both an opportunity and a pitfall of reputation management.

Keywords

Academic league tables Elite universities Institutional diversity Organizational actor Professionalization Socially-embedded university 

References

  1. Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. (2013). Paying for the Party, How College Maintain Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-David, J., & Zloczower, A. (1962). Universities and Academic Systems in Modern Societies. European Journal of Sociology, 3(1), 45–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blossfeld, H. (2009). Educational Assortative Marriage in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter, D., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, T., & Gornitzka, Å. (2016). Reputation Management in Complex Environments—A Comparative Study of University Organizations. Higher Education Policy, 30, 124–140.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, B. (1972). The Organizational Saga in Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, B. (2001). The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9–24.Google Scholar
  8. Dill, D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A Cross-National Analysis of University Ranking Systems. Higher Education, 49(4), 495–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drori, G. S., Delmestri, G., & Oberg, A. (2013). Branding the University: Relational Strategy of Identity Construction in a Competitive Field. In L. Engwall & P. Scott (Eds.), Trust in Higher Education Institutions (pp. 134–147). London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fay, D., & Zavatarro, S. (2016). Branding and Isomorphism: The Case of Higher Education. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 805–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer, C. S., & Hout, M. (2006). Century of Difference: How America Changed in the Last One Hundred Years. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. (2007). University Expansion and the Knowledge Society. Theory and Society, 36(4), 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geiger, R. L. (2014). The History of American Higher Education, Learning and Culture from the Founding to World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the Entrepreneurial University. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73–110.Google Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hout, M. (2012). Social and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krucken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the University into an Organizational Actor. In G. Drori, J. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change (pp. 241–257). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Labaree, D. (1997). Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle Over Educational Goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Labaree, D. (2013). The Power of the Parochial in Shaping the American System of Higher Education. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational Research: Institutional Spaces of Educational Research (pp. 31–46). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Labaree, D. (2017). A Perfect Mess: The Unlikely Ascendancy of American Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marginson, S. (2016). Higher Education and the Common Good. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Powell, W., Horvath, A., & Brandtner, C. (2016). Click and Mortar: Organizations on the Web. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramirez, F. (2006). The Rationalization of Universities. In M. L. Djelic & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational Governance (pp. 225–244). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ramirez, F. O. (2016). The Socially Embedded American University: Intensification and Globalization. Keynote Address at the Conference on Power, Institutions, and Authority at the University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  27. Ramirez, F. O., & Christensen, T. (2013). The Formalization of the University: Rules, Roots, and Routes. Higher Education, 65(6), 695–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramirez, F. O., Meyer, J., & Lerch, J. (2016). World Society and the Globalization of Educational Policy. In K. Mundy, A. Green, R. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook on Global Policy and Policy Making in Education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In R. Greenwood, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. (2005). The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens, M., Armstrong, E., & Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, Incubator, Temple, Hub: Empirical and Theoretical Advances in the Sociology of Higher Education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 27–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

University Websites

  1. Amherst College. (2017). “The Amherst Story.” Accessed September 23, 2017. Available online at: https://www.amherst.edu/amherst-story/history.
  2. Brown University. (2017a). “Building on Distinction: A New Plan for Brown.” Accessed September 23, 2017. Available online at: https://www.brown.edu/about/administration/strategic-planning/.
  3. Brown University. (2017b). “Research at Brown.” Accessed September 23, 2017. Available online at: https://www.brown.edu/research/.
  4. Caltech University. (2017). “Caltech—Research.” Accessed September 23, 2017. Available online at: http://www.caltech.edu/content/research.
  5. Central Washington University. (2017). “CWU—Degrees and Programs.” Accessed September 9, 2017. Available online at: https://www.cwu.edu/programs/degrees-and-programs.
  6. College of Charleston. (2017). “Campus Life—College of Charleston.” Accessed September 9, 2017. Available online at: http://cofc.edu/campuslife/.
  7. Francis Marion University. (2017). “Community—Francis Marion University.” Accessed September 9, 2017. Available online at: http://www.fmarion.edu/community/.
  8. Frostburg State University. (2017). “FSU—Student Life.” Accessed September 9, 2017. Available online at: https://www.frostburg.edu/student-life/.
  9. Our Lady of the Lake University. (2017). “Our Lady of the Lake University—Strategic Plan.” Accessed September 10, 2017. Available online at: http://www.ollusaedu/s/1190/hybrid/default-hybrid-ollu.aspx?sid=1190&gid=1&pgid=7926.
  10. St Mary’s University of Minnesota. (2017). “Student Experience—Extra-Curricular Activities, Living on Campus and Support.” Accessed September 14, 2017. Available online at: http://www.smumn.edu/student-experience.
  11. University of California, Los Angeles. (2017). “Academics—UCLA”. Accessed September 14, 2017. Available online at: http://www.ucla.edu/academics/.
  12. University of California, Riverside. (2017a). “About UCR: History.” Accessed September 14, 2017. Available online at: http://www.ucr.edu/about/history.html.
  13. University of California, Riverside. (2017b). “UCR Current Students.” Accessed September 14, 2017. Available online at: http://www.ucr.edu/students/.
  14. University of Maine, Farmington. (2017). “The History of UMF.” Accessed September 14, 2017. Available online at: http://www.umf.maine.edu/about/history-of-umf/.
  15. University of Pittsburgh, Bradford. (2017). “Strategic Plan Pitt-Bradford.” Accessed September 14, 2017. Available online at: http://www.upb.pitt.edu/strategicplan/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations