Advertisement

Reputation Management, Social Embeddedness, and Rationalization of Universities

  • Tom Christensen
  • Åse Gornitzka
  • Francisco O. Ramirez
Chapter
Part of the Public Sector Organizations book series (PSO)

Abstract

Reputation management or branding, has become increasingly important for universities in the last decades. This is partly reflecting increasing social embeddedness and the global pressure toward increasing formalization and rationalization of the universities. Accordingly, the book tries to answer the following questions: What is typical for the reputation management of the universities, as reflected by their websites? What are the core symbols—related to their performance record, professional qualities, moral features and procedural features—balanced and changing over time? How is social embeddedness reflected in the institutionalization in universities over time of diverse organizational features, exemplified by the emergence of development offices, diversity units and legal units? What explains differences between universities with respect to reputation management and the institutionalization of new organizational units?

Keywords

Formalization Rationalization Reputation management Social embeddedness Universities 

References

  1. Aberbach, J. D., & Christensen, T. (2017). Academic Autonomy and Freedom Under Pressure: Severely Limited, or Alive and Kicking? Public Organization Review.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0394-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The Road to Academic Excellence: Emerging Research Universities in Developing and Transition Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baert, P., & Shipman, A. (2005). University Under Siege? Trust and Accountability in the Contemporary Academy. European Societies, 7(1), 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-David, J., & Zloczower, A. (1962). Universities and Academic Systems in Modern Societies. European Journal of Sociology, 3(1), 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleiklie, I. (2013). Comparing University Organizations Across Boundaries. Higher Education, 67, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleiklie, I., & Michelsen, S. (2013). Comparing HE Policies in European Structures and Reform Outputs in Eight Countries. Higher Education, 65(1), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B., & Musselin, C. (2011). New Public Management, Network Governance and University as a Changing Professional Organization. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate Companion to New Public Management. Farnham, IK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, A. (1987). The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today’s Students. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  10. Bromley, P., & Meyer, J. W. (2015). Hyper-Organization: Global Organizational Expansion. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunsson, N. (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter, D. (2010). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carpenter, D., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapleo, C., Durán, M. V. C., & Díaz, A. C. (2011). Do UK Universities Communicate Their Brands Effectively Through Their Websites? Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, L. T., Torp, S., & Firat, A. F. (2005). Integrated Marketing Communications and Postmodernity: An Odd Couple? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen, T. (2011). University Governance Reforms: Potential Problems of More Autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen, T. (2014). Global Ideas and Modern Public Sector Reforms—A Theoretical Elaboration and Empirical Discussion of a Neo-Institutional Theory. American Review of Public Administration, 42(6), 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen, T., & Lodge, M. (2016). Accountability, Transparency and Societal Security. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector. Instrument, Culture and Myth. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, B. (1972). The Organizational Sage in Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, B. (1978). Academic Differentiation in National Systems of Higher Education. Comparative Education Review, 22(2), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Ambiguity and Leadership: The American College President. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Collins, R. (1979). The Credential Society: A Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Croteau, J., & Smith, Z. (2011). Making the Case for Leadership: Profiles of Chief Advancement Officers in Higher Education. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (Eds.). (1996). Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. De Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public Sector Reform in Dutch Higher Education: The Organizational Transformation of the University. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Delmestri, G., Oberg, A., & Drori, G. (2015). The Unbearable Lightness of University Branding. International Studies of Management & Organization, 45(2), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drori, G., Delmestri, G., & Oberg, A. (2013). Branding the University: Relational Strategy of Identity Construction in a Competitive Field. In P. Scott & L. Engwall (Eds.), Trust in Higher Education Institutions (pp. 134–147). London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
  32. Easton, D. (1965). The Political System. An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  33. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members’ Response to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Meyer, E. (2013). Regulatory Autonomy and Performance. The Reform of Higher Education Revisited. Higher Education, 65(5), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007, July). Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Wolrds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  36. European Commission. (2003). The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  37. European Commission. (2008). Fundraising from Philanthropy in European Universities. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  38. Flexner, A. (1930). Universities: American, English, German. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Fombrun, C. J. (2012). The Building Blocks of Corporate Reputation. In M. Barnett & T. C. Pollock (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Frank, D., & Gabler, J. (2006). Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Changes in Academic Emphases Over the 20th Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Fumasoli, T., Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2014). University Autonomy and Organizational Change Dynamics (Arena Working Paper 8: 1–33).Google Scholar
  42. Geiger, R. L. (2014). The History of American Higher Education, Learning and Culture from the Founding to World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gelber, S. (2011). The University and The People: Envisioning American Higher Education in an Era of Populist Protest. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ginsburg, L. (2014). The Rise and Decline of Faculty Governance: Professionalization and the Modern American University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  45. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Achor Books.Google Scholar
  46. Gornitzka, Å., & Larsen, I. M. (2004). Towards Professionalisation? Restructuring of Administrative Work Force in Universities. Higher Education, 47(4), 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2011). University Governance Reforms, Global Scripts and the “Nordic Model”. Accounting for Policy Change?’ In J. Schmid, K. Amos, J. Schrader, & A. Thiel (Eds.), Welten der Bildung? Vergleichende Analysen von Bildungspolitik und Bildungssystemen. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschafft.Google Scholar
  48. Gornitzka, Å., & Stensaker, B. (2014). The Dynamics of European Regulatory Regimes in Higher Education: Challenged Prerogatives and Evolutionary Change. Policy & Society: Journal of Public, Foreign and Global Policy, 33(3), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heidenheimer, A. (1981). Education and Social Security Entitlements in Europe and America. In P. Flora & A. Heidenheimer (Eds.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (pp. 269–306). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a Competitive Global Marketplace: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Higher Education Marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Non-Profit Sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huntington, S. P. (1968). America versus Europe. In S. Huntington (Ed.), Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ind, N. (2004). Living the Brand: How to Transform Every Member of Your Organization Into a Brand Champion. Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  54. Kimball, B., & Johnson, B. A. (2012a). The Beginning of ‘Free Money’ Ideology in American Universities: Charles W. Elliot at Harvard, 1869–1909. History of Education Review, 52, 222–250.Google Scholar
  55. Kimball, B., & Johnson, B. A. (2012b). The Inception of the Meaning and Significance of Endowment in American Higher Education, 1890–1930. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–32.Google Scholar
  56. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  57. Kosmützky, A. (2012). Between Mission and Market Position: Empirical Findings on Mission Statements of German Higher Education Institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Krasner, S. D. (1988). Sovereignty. An Institutional Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the University Into an Organizational Actor. In G. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Labaree, D. (2017). A Perfect Mess: The Unlikely Ascendancy of American Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lipset, S. M. (1963). The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  62. Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. (2009, January/February). Diversity and Privilege. Academe, 95(1), 17–20, 3.Google Scholar
  63. March, J. G. (1994). A Primer in Decision Making. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  65. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). Organizing Political Life. What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us About Government. American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977, September). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.Google Scholar
  68. Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission Statements: A Thematic Analysis of Rhetoric Across Institutional Type. Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Oertel, S. (2016). Structure Determined by Imprinting: The Diffusion of Diversity Management in German Universities. Paper Presented at the European Group of Organizational Studies in Naples.Google Scholar
  70. Olsen, J. P. (1992). Analyzing Institutional Dynamics. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis, 3, 247–271.Google Scholar
  71. Olsen, J. P. (2007). The Institutional Dynamics of the European University. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Olzak, S., & Kangas, N. (2008). Organizational Innovation: Establishing Racial, Ethnic, and Women’s Studies Programs in the U.S. Sociology of Education, 81, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Portnoi, L., Bagley, S., & Rust, V. (2010). Mapping the Terrain: The Global Competition Phenomenon in Higher Education. In V. Rust, L. Portnoi, & S. Bagley (Eds.), Higher Education, Policy, and the Global Competition Phenomenon (pp. 1–33). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Powell, W. W., Horvath, A., & Brandtner, C. (2016). Click and Mortar: Organizations on the Web. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ramirez, F. O. (2006a). The Rationalization of the University. In M.-L. Dejelic & K. Sahlin-Anderson (Eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Ramirez, F. O. (2006b). Growing Commonalities and Persistent Differences in Higher Education: Universities Between Globalization and National Tradition. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Education: Advancing Research and Policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  78. Ramirez, F. O. (2010). Accounting for Excellence: Transforming Universities Into Organizational Actors. In V. Rust, L. Portnoi, & S. Bagely (Eds.), Higher Education, Policy, and The Global Competition Phenomenon (pp. 54–75). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  79. Ramirez, F. O., & Christensen, T. (2013). The Formalization of the University: Rules, Roots, and Routes. Higher Education, 65(6), 695–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ramirez, F., Meyer, J. W., & Lerch, J. (2016). World Society and the Globalization of Educational Policy. In K. Mundy, A. Green, R. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook on Global Policy and Policy Making in Education (pp. 43–63). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  81. Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Rindova, V. P., & Martins, L. (2012). Show Me the Money: A Multidimensional Perspective on Reputation as an Intangible Asset. In M. Barnett & T. C. Pollock (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Rojas, F. (2007). From Black Power to Black Studies: How a Radical Social Movement Became an Academic Discipline. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Røvik, K. A. (2002). The Secrets of the Winners: Management Ideas That Flow. In K. Sahlin-Andersson & L. Engwall (Eds.), The Expansion of Management Knowledge—Carriers, Flows and Sources. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In R. Greenwood, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sataøen, H. L. (2014). Åpne, mangfoldige og respektfulle? Visjoner og kjerneverdier i norske og svenske høyere utdanningsinstitusjoner [Open, Diverse and Respectful? Visions and Core Values in Norwegian and Swedish Higher Educational Institutions]. Högre utbildning, 4, 95–108.Google Scholar
  87. Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schudson, M. (1988). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  89. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  90. Shavelson, R. (2008). The Quest to Assess Learning and Hold Higher Education Accountable. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  92. Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic Moves to the Market: United States and the European Union. Higher Education, 63(5), 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Smelser, N., & Alexander, J. (Eds.). (1999). Diversity and Its Discontents: Cultural Conflict and Common Ground. New Jersey: Princeton Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  95. Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social Structure and Organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  96. Van Riel, C. B. M., & Fombrun, C. (2007). Essentials of Corporate Communications. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Veloutsou, C., Lewis, J. W., & Paton, R. (2004). University Selection: Information Requirements and Importance. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 160–171.Google Scholar
  98. Wedlin, L., & Pallas, J. (2017). Styrning och frihet - en ohelig allians? In L. Wedlin & J. Pallas (Eds.), Det ostyrda universitetet? (pp. 9–37). Stockholm and Göteborg: Makadam Förlag.Google Scholar
  99. Wilensky, H. L. (1964, September). The Professionalization of Everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.Google Scholar
  100. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  101. Wotipka, C. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2008). Women’s Studies as a Global Innovation. In D. Baker & A. Wiseman (Eds.), The Worldwide Transformation of Higher Education (pp. 89–110). Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wæraas, A., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2012). Public Sector Organizations and Reputation Management: Five Problems. International Public Management Journal, 15(2), 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wæraas, A., & Maor, M. (2015). Understanding Organizational Reputation in a Public Sector Context. In A. Wæraas & M. Maor (Eds.), Organizational Reputation in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  104. Wæraas, A., & Solbakk, M. N. (2009). Defining the Essence of University: Lessons from Higher Education Branding. Higher Education, 57(4), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Christensen
    • 1
  • Åse Gornitzka
    • 1
  • Francisco O. Ramirez
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Graduate School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations