Advertisement

Organisational Challenges to Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Rafael Mattos Deus
  • Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles
  • Karina Rabelo Ogasawara Vieira
  • Rosane Aparecida Gomes Battistelle
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is part of the sustainability debate within organizations and, consequently, a number of systems to manage this issue have emerged. ISO 26000, for example, aims to assist organizations in contributing to sustainable development and employing international standards of behaviour. This type of standard is attractive, but there are some challenges that organizations need to face before adopting it. Considering these challenges, this chapter presents some characteristics of ISO 26000 and the main drivers and barriers to adopting CSR initiatives as well social standards. The literature is investigated to present important findings about CSR, social standards, and the drivers and barriers of CSR. The chapter presents in detail the main drivers toward CSR, e.g., stakeholder pressure, globalization, reputation, competitive advantage, decrease in risks around the business, government laws, improving the relationship between employees and the organization, improving the relationship between co-workers, compatibility with other standards, and company size. Just as there are drivers, there are also barriers to ISO implementation. The chapter also presents some of the barriers to the implementation of CSR systems and standards, e.g., lack of knowledge or awareness of CSR, lack of knowledge about how to implement CSR with the organization’s strategy, commercial barriers (national and international), lack of sensitivity to the theme, and financial resources. The barriers can be a challenge for organizational management. Organizations can use the tools presented by the standards and take advantage of the drivers, reinforcing their convictions and justifying their actions in order to implement CSR initiatives.

References

  1. Abdullah, S., Razak, A. A., Hanafi, M. H., & Jaafar, M. (2013). Implementation barriers of ISO 9000 within the Malaysian local government. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(8), 853–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, M. A., & Ghaly, A. E. (2007). Determining barriers to sustainability within the Costa Rican coffee industry. Sustainable Development, 15(4), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agudo-Valiente, J. M., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Salvador-Figueras, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility drivers and barriers according to managers’ perception; Evidence from Spanish firms. Sustainability, 9(10), 1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Fisscher, O. A. (2013). An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, S. B. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, L. R., & Croker, N. (2013). The relevance of the ISO 26000 social responsibility issues to the Hong Kong construction industry. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 13(3), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biondi, V., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2000). Environmental management systems and SMEs. Greener Management International, (January), 55–69.Google Scholar
  8. Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and supply chains—On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiarini, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2017). Differences in implementing corporate social responsibility through SA8000 and ISO 26000 standards: Research from European manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(4), 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiavenato, I. (2004). Introdução À Teoria Geral Da Administração: Edição Compacta (3rd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Deus, R. M., Seles, B. M. R. P., & Vieira, K. R. O. (2014). As Organizações e a ISO 26000: Revisão dos conceitos, dos motivadores e das barreiras de implementação. Gestão & Produção, 21(4), 793–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the suitable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 90–100.Google Scholar
  13. Galbreath, J. (2009). Building corporate social responsibility into strategy. European Business Review, 21(2), 109–127.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340910940123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habbash, M. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 740–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hahn, R. (2012). ISO 26000 and the standardization of strategic management processes for sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harazin, P., & Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences, 21(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67.Google Scholar
  18. Hasan, F. S. M., & Almubarak, M. M. S. (2016). Factors influencing women entrepreneurs’ performance in SMEs. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holt, K. (1999). Management and organization through 100 Years. Technovation, 19(3), 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 26000: Guidance on social responsibility.Google Scholar
  21. Kalyar, M. N., Rafi, N., & Kalyar, A. N. (2013). Factors affecting corporate social responsibility: An empirical study. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(4), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matinaro, V., & Yang, L. (2017). Towards increased innovativeness and sustainability through organizational culture: A case study of a Finnish construction business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(October 2016), 3184–3193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Merlin, F. K., Pereira, V. L. D. V., & Júnior, W. P. (2012). Sustainable development induction in organizations: A convergence analysis of ISO standards management tools’ parameters. Work, 41(Suppl 1), 2736–2743.Google Scholar
  24. Muthu, S., Gopalakrishnan, C. P. S., & Ammasaiappan, M. (2015). Integrated management systems for better environmental performance and sustainable development – a review. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14(5), 985–1000.Google Scholar
  25. Ortová, M., & Stanková, E. (2011). The preparedness of certain companies to implement the ISO 26000 standard. In International Conference Liberec Economic Forum (Vol. 10, pp. 372–381). Liberec: Technickà univerzita v Liberci.Google Scholar
  26. Park, J. Y., & Kim, S. W. (2011). Global corporate social responsibility standard, ISO 26000 and its effect on the society. Asian Journal on Quality, 12(3), 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinkse, J., & Dommisse, M. (2009). Overcoming barriers to sustainability: An explanation of residential builders’ reluctance to adopt clean technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(8), 515–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pojasek, R. B. (2011). ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility. Environmental Quality Management, 20(3), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qi, G., Zeng, S., Yin, H., & Lin, H. (2013). ISO and OHSAS certifications: How stakeholders affect corporate decisions on sustainability. Management Decision, 51(10), 1983–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salazar, L., Alejandra, J. F. O. H., & Manríquez, M. R. (2017). La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Desde La Percepción Del Capital Humano. Estudio de Un Caso. Revista de Contabilidad, 20(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, B., & Tilling, K. (2009). ‘ISO-lating’ corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: A dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(5), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegele, L., & Ward, H. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: A step towards stronger involvement of business in MEA implementation? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 16(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Valmohammadi, C. (2011). Investigating corporate social responsibility practices in Iranian organizations: An ISO 26000 perspective. Business Strategy Series, 12(5), 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Valmohammadi, C. (2014). Impact of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: An ISO 26000 perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ward, H. (2011). The ISO 26000 international guidance standard on social responsibility: Implications for public policy and transnational democracy. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12(2), 665–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. von Weltzien Høivik, H. (2011). Embedding CSR as a learning and knowledge creating process: The case for SMEs in Norway. Journal of Management Development, 30(10), 1067–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. von Weltzien Høivik, H., & Shankar, D. (2011). How can SMEs in a cluster respond to global demands for corporate responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolak-Tuzimek, A., Tarnawska, J., & Chmiel, M. (2017). The natural environment as an area of corporate social responsibility. Ochrona Srodowiska I Zasobów Naturalnych, 28(3), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zeng, S. X., Tian, P., & Tam, C. M. (2007). Overcoming barriers to sustainable implementation of the ISO 9001 system. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(3), 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Mattos Deus
    • 1
  • Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles
    • 1
  • Karina Rabelo Ogasawara Vieira
    • 1
  • Rosane Aparecida Gomes Battistelle
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Engineering, Department of Production EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP)BauruBrazil
  2. 2.School of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP)BauruBrazil

Personalised recommendations