Advertisement

Pragmatic Justice: At Any Cost?

  • Asher Flynn
  • Arie Freiberg
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

Plea negotiations have a long history. However, modern forms of negotiation take place in an ideologically different context with an increasing emphasis on economy and efficiency. Changes in the way governments fund legal services are occurring in many jurisdictions with significant implications for procedural and substantive justice, including a dramatic increase in unrepresented defendants and defendants presenting with some degree of mental impairment (and associated high levels of alcohol and drug use). This chapter examines the prevalence and implications of resourcing constraints in the context of plea negotiations, with a specific focus on unrepresented defendants and defendants presenting with mental health concerns.

Keywords

Guilty plea Pressure Mental illness Mental impairment Resources Legal aid Plea bargaining Plea negotiations 

References

References

  1. Baldry, E, Dowse, L & Clarence, M 2011, ‘People with mental and cognitive disabilities: pathways into prison’, Background paper for the National Legal Aid conference, Darwin 2011, School of Social Sciences and International Studies, UNSW. Available from: https://www.mhdcd.unsw.edu.au/sites/www.mhdcd.unsw.edu.au/files/u18/pdf/MHDCDbackgroundOutlaws%20Conf1.pdf [accessed 18 January 2016].
  2. Baldwin, J & McConville, M 1977, Negotiated justice: pressures to plead guilty, Martin Robertson, London.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, J & McConville, M 1979, ‘Plea bargaining and the research dilemma’, Law and Policy Quarterly, vol. 1, pp. 223–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottoms, A & McClean, J 1976, Defendants in the Criminal Process, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Buckle, S & Buckle, L 1977, Bargaining for justice: case disposition and reform in the criminal courts, Praeger Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Community Law Australia 2012, ‘Unaffordable and out of reach: the problem of access to the Australian legal system’, Community Law Australia, report.Google Scholar
  7. Euvrard, E & Leclerc, C 2017, ‘Pre-trial detention and guilty pleas: Inducement or coercion’, Punishment and Society, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 525–542.Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, A 2011, ‘“Fortunately we in Victoria are not in that UK situation”: Australian and United Kingdom perspectives on plea bargaining reform’, Deakin Law Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 361–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flynn, A 2016, ‘Plea negotiations, prosecutors and discretion: an argument for legal reform’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 564–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flynn, A & Hodgson, J 2017a (eds) Access to justice & legal aid: comparative perspectives on unmet legal needs, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Flynn, A & Hodgson, J 2017b, ‘Access to justice and legal aid cuts: A mismatch of concepts in the contemporary Australian and British legal landscapes’, in A Flynn & J Hodgson (eds), Access to justice & legal aid: comparative perspectives on unmet legal needs, pp. 1–22, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Flynn, A, Hodgson, J, McCulloch, J & Naylor, B 2016, ‘Legal aid and access to legal representation: redefining the right to a fair trial’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 207–39.Google Scholar
  13. Freiberg, A 2005, ‘Managerialism in Australian criminal justice: RIP for KPIs?’ Monash University Law Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 12–36.Google Scholar
  14. Freiberg, A & Seifman, R 2001, ‘Plea bargaining in Victoria: the role of counsel’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 64–74.Google Scholar
  15. Gazal-Ayal, O & Tor, A 2012, ‘The innocence effect’, Duke Law Journal, vol. 62, pp. 339–401.Google Scholar
  16. Giddings, J 1998, Legal aid in Victoria: at the crossroads again, Fitzroy Legal Service, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  17. Gold, R M, Hessick, C B & Hessick, F A 2017, ‘Civilizing Criminal Settlements’, Boston University Law Review, vol. 97, pp. 1607–1660.Google Scholar
  18. Hodgson, J 2010, ‘The future of adversarial criminal justice in 21st century Britain’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 101–141.Google Scholar
  19. JUSTICE 1993, Negotiated justice: a closer look at the implications of plea bargains, JUSTICE Publications, London.Google Scholar
  20. Laster, K & Kornhauser, R 2017, ‘The rise of “DIY” law: implications for legal aid’, in A Flynn & J Hodgson (eds), Access to justice and legal aid: comparative perspectives on unmet legal need, pp. 123–40, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Mack, K & Roach Anleu, S 2000, ‘Choice, consent and autonomy in a guilty plea system’, Law in Context, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
  22. Maynard, D 1984, Inside plea bargaining: the language of negotiation, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McConville, M 2002, ‘Plea bargaining’, in M McConville & G Wilson (eds), The handbook of the criminal justice process, pp. 353–79, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McConville, M, Hodgson, J, Lee, B & Pavlovic, A 1994, Standing Accused: The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McConville, M & Marsh, L 2014, Criminal judges: legitimacy, courts and state-induced guilty pleas in Britain, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McConville, M & Mirsky, C 2005, Jury trials and plea bargaining: a true history, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. McCoy, C 1990, Politics and plea bargaining: victims’ rights in California, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  28. McEwan, J 2011, ‘From adversarialism to managerialism: criminal justice in transition’, Legal Studies, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 519–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulroy, S 2017, ‘The bright line’s dark side: pre-charge attachment of the sixth amendment right to counsel’, Washington Law Review, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 214–252.Google Scholar
  30. Newman, D 2013, Legal aid Lawyers and the quest for justice, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  31. Noone, M A 2017, ‘Challenges facing the Australian legal aid system’, in A Flynn & J Hodgson (eds), Legal aid and access to justice: comparative perspectives of unmet legal need, p. 23e42, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Noone, M A & Tomsen, S 2006, Lawyers in conflict: Australian lawyers and legal aid, Federation Press, New South Wales.Google Scholar
  33. Productivity Commission 2014, Access to justice arrangements inquiry, Report No. 72, 5 September, Productivity Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  34. Rebuli, A 2015, ‘The cost of cutting legal assistance funding’, Access to Justice Bulletin: Law Society of South Australia, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 20–1.Google Scholar
  35. Redlich, A D, Wilford, M M & Bushway S 2017, ‘Understanding guilty pleas through the lens of social science’, Psychology, Public Policy and Law, vol. 23, pp. 458–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, T & Cape, E 2017, ‘The rise and decline of criminal legal aid in England and Wales’, in A Flynn & J Hodgson (eds), Access to justice & legal aid: comparative perspectives on unmet legal needs, pp. 63–86, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Spencer, P 2017, ‘A View from the Bench: A Judicial Perspective on Legal Representation, Court Excellence and Therapeutic Jurisprudence’, in A Flynn & J Hodgson (eds), Access to justice & legal aid: comparative perspectives on unmet legal needs, pp. 87–102, Hart Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Spivakovsky, C 2014, ‘Making risk and dangerousness intelligible in intellectual disability’, Griffith Law Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ulbrick, M, Flynn, A & Tyson, D 2016, ‘The abolition of defensive homicide: a step towards populist punitivism at the expense of mentally impaired offenders’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 324–70.Google Scholar
  40. Victoria Legal Aid [VLA] 2016a, Means test changes to financial eligibility thresholds, VLA. Available from: http://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/information-for-lawyers/how-we-are-improving-our-services/means-test-review [accessed 18 January 2017].
  41. Victoria Legal Aid [VLA] 2016c, Sentencing guidance reference, Submission to the Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council, 12 February, VLA.Google Scholar
  42. Victoria Legal Aid [VLA] 2017, Annual report 2016–17, VLA, Melbourne. Available from: https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/sites/www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/files/VLA-annual-report-2016-17.pdf [accessed 30 January 2018].
  43. Victorian Law Reform Commission [VLRC] 2014, Review of the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997, June 2014, Available from: http://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Review_of_the_Crimes_Mental_Impairment_and_Unfitness_to_be_Tried_Act_0.pdf [accessed 8 February 2018].
  44. Victorian Ombudsman 2014, Investigation into deaths and harm in custody, Victorian Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  45. Vogel, M 2007, Coercion to Compromise: Plea Bargaining, the Courts and the Making of Political Authority, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asher Flynn
    • 1
  • Arie Freiberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations