The Negotiation Process

  • Asher Flynn
  • Arie Freiberg
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)


The negotiation process can be long and sometimes difficult. Although it is conducted in the shadow of the trial, away from public view, this study found there is a framework of informal rules and procedures known primarily to those within the legal community that to some extent regulates their involvement. This chapter examines in close detail how the negotiation process operates, including who is involved, when, how and in relation to what matters. This includes a discussion of the key factors considered by parties when engaging in negotiations, the various factors shaping negotiations, the role of police charging practices in negotiations, differences between negotiations in summary and indictable jurisdictions and the effects of limited resources and legal culture on negotiations.


Early resolution Plea deals Personalities Discretion Plea bargaining Plea negotiations Police Charging 



  1. Ashworth, A 1994, The criminal process: an evaluative study, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, A 2010, Sentencing and criminal justice (5th edn), Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, H M 2011, ‘Coercive plea bargaining: the unrecognized scourge of the justice system’, Catholic University Law Review, vol. 61, no. 829.Google Scholar
  4. Champion, J 2012, ‘Plea offers and discontinuances: DPP speech’, paper presented at the Law Institute of Victoria Annual Criminal Law Conference, Melbourne, 27 July. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  5. Chan, J & Barnes, L 1995, The price of justice: lengthy criminal trials in Australia, Hawkins Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
  6. College of Policing 2015, Prosecution and case management: charging and case preparation, Authorised Professional Practice, College of Policing. Available from: [accessed 18 January 2016].
  7. Corns, C 1997, Anatomy of long criminal trials, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, A 2010b, ‘Victoria’s Legal Aid funding structure: hindering the ideals inherent to the pre-trial process’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 48–63.Google Scholar
  9. Flynn, A 2011, ‘“Fortunately we in Victoria are not in that UK situation”: Australian and United Kingdom perspectives on plea bargaining reform’, Deakin Law Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 361–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flynn, A 2012, ‘Bargaining with justice: victims, plea bargaining and the Victims’ Charter Act 2006 (Vic)’, Monash University Law Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 73–96.Google Scholar
  11. Flynn, A 2016, ‘Plea negotiations, prosecutors and discretion: an argument for legal reform’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 564–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flynn, A & Fitz-Gibbon, K 2011, ‘Bargaining with defensive homicide: examining Victoria’s secretive plea bargaining system post law reform’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 905.Google Scholar
  13. Flynn, A, Hodgson, J, McCulloch, J & Naylor, B 2016, ‘Legal aid and access to legal representation: redefining the right to a fair trial’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 207–39.Google Scholar
  14. Freedman, M. H 1975, Lawyers’ ethics in an adversary system, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  15. Freiberg, A & Seifman, R 2001, ‘Plea bargaining in Victoria: the role of counsel’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 64–74.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, K 2014, ‘Overcharging’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 11, pp. 701–24.Google Scholar
  17. Hogarth, J 1971, Sentencing as a human process, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  18. House of Commons Justice Committee 2009, The Crown Prosecution Service: gatekeeper of the criminal justice system – government response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2008–09, Second Special Report of Session 2009–10, House of Commons, The Stationary Office Limited, London.Google Scholar
  19. Kirkwood, D, McKenzie, M & Tyson D 2013, ‘Justice or judgment: the impact of Victorian homicide law reforms on responses to women who kill intimate partners’, Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria (DVRCV)/Monash University, Discussion Paper 9.Google Scholar
  20. McConville, M & Marsh, L 2014, Criminal judges: legitimacy, courts and state-induced guilty pleas in Britain, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McConville, M, Sanders, A & Leng, R 1991, The case for the prosecution: police suspects and the construction of criminality, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  22. New South Wales Legislative Council 2013, The partial defence of provocation, Select Committee on the Partial Defence of Provocation, Standing Order 231, 23 April 2013, Legislative Council, NSW.Google Scholar
  23. Payne, J 2007, Criminal trial delays in Australia: trial listing outcomes (Research and Public Policy Series #74), Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
  24. Pedley, M 1998, ‘The problems with court rules and procedures in criminal cases: a prosecution perspective’, paper presented at Reform of Court Rules and Procedures in Criminal Cases Conference, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Brisbane, Australia, 3–4 July. Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Victoria.Google Scholar
  25. Police Association of NSW 2013, Encouraging appropriate early guilty pleas: models for discussion, Parliamentary Submission, Consultation Paper 15, New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Sydney. Available from: [accessed 8 February 2018].
  26. Rahman, S, Poynton, S & Weatherburn, D 2017, The NSW rolling list court evaluation: Final report, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, no. 208. Available from: [accessed 26 January 2018].
  27. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2017b, Criminal Justice Parts III–VI, Royal Commission, Sydney.Google Scholar
  28. Seifman, R 1982, ‘Plea bargaining in Victoria: getting the judges’ views’, Criminal Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 69–88.Google Scholar
  29. Sheehy, E, Stubbs, J & Tolmie, J 2014, ‘Securing fair outcomes for battered women charged with homicide: analysing defence lawyering in R v Falls’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 38, pp. 666–708.Google Scholar
  30. Standing Committee of Attorneys-General 1999, Criminal trial procedure report (Martin Report), Commonwealth Department of Attorney-General, Canberra.Google Scholar
  31. Standing Committee of Attorneys-General 2000, Deliberate forum on criminal trial reform report, Commonwealth Department of Attorney General, Canberra.Google Scholar
  32. Stubbs, J & Tolmie, J 2008, ‘Battered women charged with homicide: advancing the interests of Indigenous women’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 41, pp. 138–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sulan, J R 2000, ‘Defence co-operation in the trial process’, paper presented at Australian Institute of Judicial Administration: Criminal Trial Reform Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 24–25 March 2000.Google Scholar
  34. Tague, P W 2008, ‘Guilty pleas or trials: which does the barrister prefer?’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 242–74.Google Scholar
  35. Victorian Office of Public Prosecutions Victoria [OPP] 2007, Annual report. Available from: [accessed 28 February 2017].
  36. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2007, Sentence indications and specified sentence discounts: final report, SAC, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  37. Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council [SAC] 2015, Guilty pleas in the higher courts: rates, timing, and discounts, Sentencing Advisory Council, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  38. Victorian Shorter Trials Committee 1985, Report on criminal trials, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated, Canberra.Google Scholar
  39. Weatherburn, D & Baker, J 2000, Managing trial court delay: an analysis of trial court processing in the NSW District Criminal Court, New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Attorney-General’s Department, Sydney.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, J AO QC 2013, ‘Promoting a more efficient use of the criminal justice system’, NSWLRC, 3–5 October, New South Wales Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, R F & Levine, K L 2014, ‘The cure for young prosecutors’ syndrome’, Arizona Law Review, vol. 56, pp. 1065–1128.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asher Flynn
    • 1
  • Arie Freiberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations