Advertisement

The Entrepreneurial Galaxy Reimagined: Prevent, Detect, and Respond to Your Mistakes

  • Samuel Dinnar
  • Lawrence Susskind
Chapter

Abstract

Both budding and experienced entrepreneurs can improve their chances of success if they can sharpen their self-awareness, enhance their situational sensitivity, and build their communication skills. This chapter provides very specific instructions about how to prepare for various kinds of negotiations (with actors in all parts of their entrepreneurial galaxy), how to handle moves while at the negotiation table, and how to reflect afterward. The goal is to prevent the typical mistakes that have been identified, detect mistakes that have been made inadvertently, and recover from these mistakes, especially when important relationships are threatened. The book re-conceptualizes entrepreneurship through the lens of negotiation and provides clear prescriptive advice based on practical findings. A special section is devoted to the challenges of gender and diversity, proposing techniques to overcome biases and to deal with cultural barriers. These concepts are then extended to discuss the advantages and methods of using agents to negotiate on your behalf.

Keywords

Prevent mistakes Detect mistakes Recover from mistakes Gender biases Cross-cultural challenges Using agents 

Bibliography

  1. Amanatullah, Emily T., and Michael W. Morris. 2010. Negotiating Gender Roles: Gender Differences in Assertive Negotiating Are Mediated by Women's Fear of Backlash and Attenuated When Negotiating on Behalf of Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 (2): 256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashenfelter, Orley, and David Bloom. 1990. Lawyers as Agents of the Devil in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Princeton University: Industrial Relations Section, Working Paper #270.Google Scholar
  3. Bowles, Hannah Riley, and Bobbi Thomason. 2015. Using Research to Generate Advice for Women: Examples from Negotiation Research. In Auswahl von Mannern und Frauen als Fuhrungskrafte, ed. M. WElpe et al., 357–366. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowles, Hannah Riley., Linda Babcock, and Kathleen L. McGinn. 2005. Constraints and Triggers: Situational Mechanics of Gender in Negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6): 951–965.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowles, Hannah Riley, Linda Babcock, and Lei Lai. 2007. Social Incentives for Gender Differences in the Propensity to Initiate Negotiations: Sometimes It Does Hurt to Ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103 (1): 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, Alison W., Laura Huang, Sarah Wood Kearney and Fiona E. Murray. 2014. Investors Prefer Entrepreneurial Ventures Pitched by Attractive Men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the United States of America (PNAS) March 25, 2014. 111 (12) 4427–4431.Google Scholar
  7. Cialdini, Robert B. 2006. The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  8. Coan, James, and John M. Gottman. 2007. The Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF). In Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, 267–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Curhan, Jared R., Alex Pentland, Ron Caneel, Nathan Eagle, Martin C. Martin. 2004. A Negotiation Analyzer. MIT Media Lab, Technical Note 5777.Google Scholar
  10. Driver, Janice, Amber Tabernes, Alyson Shapiro, Eun Y. Nahm, and John M. Gottman. 2003. Interactional Patterns in Marital Success and Failure: Gottman Laboratory Studies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duhigg, Charles. 2012. The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business. Canada: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. Ely, Robin J., Debra E. Meyerson, and Martin N. Davidson. 2006. Rethinking Political Correctness. Harvard Business Review, September 2006: 79–84Google Scholar
  13. Engel, Beverly. 2002. The Power of Apology: Healing Steps to Transform All Your Relationships. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without giving In. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, Gary, and Jack Himmelstein. 2008. Challenging Conflict: Mediation Through Understanding. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
  16. Goleman. 1998. Working with Emotional Intelligence. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  17. Ito, Tiffany A., Jeff T. Larsen, N. Kyle Smith, and John T. Cacioppo. 1998. Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (4): 887–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johns, M., T. Schmader, and A. Martens. 2005. Knowing Is Half the Battle: Teaching Stereotype Threat as a Means of Improving Women’s Math Performance. Psychological Science 16 (3): 175–179.Google Scholar
  19. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux. ISBN-10: 0374275637, ISBN-13: 978-0374275631.Google Scholar
  20. Kanze, Dana, Laura Huang, Mark A. Conley, and E. Tory Higgins. 2018. Male and Female Entrepreneurs Get Asked Different Questions by VCs – and It Affects How Much Funding They Get. Academy of Management Journal 61 (2). Published Online: 20 Apr 2018.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1215.
  21. Kray, L.J., J.A. Kennedy, and A.B. Van Zant. 2014. Not Competent Enough to Know the Difference? Gender Stereotypes about Women’s Ease of Being Misled Predict Negotiator Deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 125 (2): 61–72.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, Michael. 2017. The Undoing Project: A Friendship that Changed Our Minds. Waterville: Thorndike Press.Google Scholar
  23. Liu, Leigh A., Chei Hwee Chua, and Günter K. Stahl. 2010. Quality of Communication Experience: Definition, Measurement, and Implication for Intercultural Negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (3): 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raina, Sahil. 2016. Research: The Gender Gap in Startup Success Disappears When Women Fund Women. Harvard Business Review, July 19.Google Scholar
  25. Schwarts, Barry, and Kenneth Sharpe. 2010. Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to Do the Right Thing. New York: Riverhead.Google Scholar
  26. Shih, Margaret, Todd L. Pittinsky, and Nalini Ambady. 1999. Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance. Psychological Science 10 (1): 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Solnick, S.J. 2001. Gender Differences in the Ultimatum Game. Economic Inquiry 39: 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Susskind, Lawrence. 2003. Winning and Blocking Coalitions: Bring Both to a Crowded Table, Negotiation. Harvard Business School Publishing. https://hbr.org/product/winning-and-blocking-coalitions-bring-both-to-a-crowded-table/N0401B-PDF-ENG
  29. Susskind, Lawrence. 2014. Good for You, Great for Me: Finding the Trading Zone and Winning at Win-Win Negotiation. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Susskind, Lawrence, and Hallam Movius. 2009. Built to Win: Creating a World Class Negotiating Organization. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  31. Susskind, Lawrence, Sarah McKearnen, and Jennifer Thomas-Lamar. 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Turban, Stephen, Laura Freeman, and Ben Waber. 2017. A Study Used Sensors to Show That Men and Women Are Treated Differently at Work. Harvard Business Review, October 2016.Google Scholar
  33. Ury, William. 1991. Getting Past No: Negotiating With Difficult People. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
  34. Wityliet, Charlotte V.O., Everett L. Worthington, Lindsey M. Root, Amy F. Sato, and Thomas E. Ludwig. 2008. Retributive Justice, Restorative Justice, And Forgiveness: An Experimental Psychophysiology Analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (1): 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Dinnar
    • 1
  • Lawrence Susskind
    • 2
  1. 1.Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law SchoolCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Urban Studies and PlanningMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations