Advertisement

Deep History, Interspecies Coevolution, and the Eco-imaginary

  • Louise Westling
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature book series (PSAAL)

Abstract

The recent turn to deep history reveals an interrelational story of hominin emergence among myriad other living creatures, full of bodily intimacies, shared habitats, and interspecific cultural communications. This essay examines studies of coevolution, symbiosis, and mimicry expressing pervasive intersubjectivity that are increasingly acknowledged by biologists and biosemioticians. Traditional oral narratives, rituals, and early literary texts encode sedimented evolutionary histories of such relationships, preserving and continuing memories that are semiotic scaffoldings of cultural mimicry, mirroring and mapping the living world where our ancestors saw themselves in dynamic interrelation with the other animal species around them. These constitute an eco-imaginary expressing the human participation in coevolved animality that Merleau-Ponty saw as the logos of the sensible world.

Works Cited

  1. Ardetti, J., Elliott, J., Kitching, I.J., and Wasserthal, L.T. “‘Good Heavens What Insect Can Suck it’—Charles Darwin, Angraecum sesquipedale and Xanthopan morganii praedicta.” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 169 (2012): 403–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle (350 B.C.E) Poetics, trans. S. H. Butcher (orig. 1902) The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/poetics.1.1.html.
  3. Berger, Lee R., et al. “Homo naledi, a New Species of the Genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa.” eLIFE 4 (2015): e09560. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09560.
  4. Bernheimer, Richard. Wild Men in the Middle Ages: A Study in Art, Sentiment, and Demonology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carey, Nessa. The Epigenetics Revolution: How Modern Biology is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease, and Inheritance. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. “Caterpillar Mimics Snake.” (2016). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0_cteveCQI.
  7. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2009): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clottes, Jean. Chauvet Cave: The Art of the Earliest Times. Salt Lake: University of Utah Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Clottes, Jean, and David Lewis Williams. The Shamans of Prehistory: Trance and Magic in the Painted Caves. Translated by Sophie Hawkes. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Dalley, Stephanie. “‘Introduction’ to The Epic of Gilgamesh.” In Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, the Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others, ed. and trans. Stephanie Dalley. 39–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. ———. “The Natural World in Ancient Mesopotamian Literature.” In A Global History of Literature and the Environment, eds. John Parham and Louise Westling. 21–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  12. Darwin, Charles. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, and the Good Effects of Intercrossing. London: John Murray, 1862.Google Scholar
  13. ———. The Origin of Species. London: Penguin, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. “Darwins Comet Orchid.” (2008). You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMVN1EWxfAU.
  15. Deacon, Terrence W. “Is Semiosis One of Darwin’s ‘Several Powers’?” In Semiotics in the Wild: Essays in Honour of Kalevi Kull on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. with intro. Kati Lindström, Riin Magnus, Timo Maran, and Morten Tønnessen, 71–77. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. De Bona, Sebastiano, Janne K. Valkonen, Andrés López-Sepulcre, and Johanna Mappes. “Predator Mimicry, Not Conspicuousness, Explains the Efficacy of Butterfly Eyespots.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282 (2015): 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  18. Descola, Philippe. The Ecology of Others. Translated by Geneviève Godbout and Benjamin P. Luley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Deur, Douglas. “A Most Sacred Place: The Significance of Crater Lake among the Indians of Southern Oregon.” The Oregon Historical Quarterly 103 (2002), 18–49.Google Scholar
  20. Douglas, Angela E. The Symbiotic Habit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  21. Dufourcq, Annabelle. “Is a World without Animals Possible?” In Broken Bonds? Questioning Anthropological Difference, special issue of Environmental Philosophy, Guest editor Annabelle Dufourcq (2014a): 71–91.Google Scholar
  22. ———. “The Ontological Imaginary: Dehiscence, Sorcery, and Creativity in Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy.” Filozofia 69 (2014b): 708–718.Google Scholar
  23. Ehrlich, Paul, and Peter Raven. “Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution.” Evolution 18 (1964), 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feldman, M.W., and Laland, K.N. “Gene-Culture Coevolutionary Theory.” Trends in Ecological Evolution 5347 (1996), 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. Gilgamesh, Epic of, Standard Version. Translated by Stephanie Dalley in Myths from Mesopotamia, ed. Stephanie Dalley, 39–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  26. Gómez, Jordi, Ascensión Ariza-Mateos, and Isabel Cacho. “Virus is a Signal for the Host Cell.” Biosemiotics 8 (2015): 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, Eugene E. Ancestors in Our Genome: The New Science of Human Evolution. New York: Oxford, 2015.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffmeyer, Jesper. Biosemiotics: Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  30. ———. “I am Plural.” In Semiotics in the Wild: Essays in Honour of Kalevi Kull on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. with intro. Kati Lindström, Riin Magnus, Timo Maran, and Morten Tønnessen, 177–182. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  31. ———. “Semiotic Scaffolding: A Unitary Principle Gluing Life and Culture Together.” In Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism, special issue on Biosemiotics and Culture, ed. Wendy Wheeler and Louise Westling, 243–254, 2015.Google Scholar
  32. ———. Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  33. Hone, Dave. “Moth Tongues, Orchids, and Darwin—The Predictive Power of Evolution.” 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/science/lost-worlds/2013/oct/02/moth-tongues-orchids-darwin-evolution.
  34. Husserl, Edmund “Addendum XXIII of the Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology.” Translated by Niall Keane. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 44, no. 6 (January 2013).Google Scholar
  35. Kleisner, Karel. “The Semantic Morphology of Adolf Portmann: A Starting Point for the Biosemiotics of Organic Form?” Biosemiotics 1 (2008), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9014-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kull, Kalevi. “Adaptive Evolution without Natural Selection.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112 (2014): 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. “The Biosemiotic Concept of the Species.” Biosemiotics (2016). Published online March 14, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9259-2.
  38. Laland, K.N., J. Odling-Smee, and S. Myles. “How Culture Shaped the Human Genome: Bringing Genetics and the Humans Sciences Together.” The National Review of Genetics 11 (2010): 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leroi-Gourhan, A. Treasures of Prehistoric Art. Translated by Norbert Guterman. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1967.Google Scholar
  40. Lewontin, Richard. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  41. Lindström, Kati, Riin Magnus, Timo Maran, and Morten Tønnessen, (Eds.). Semiotics in the Wild: Essays in Honour of Kalevi Kull on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  42. Lingis, Alphonso. “Animal Body, Inhuman Face.” In Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal, ed. Cary Wolfe, 165–182. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  43. Maran, Timo. “Scaffolding and Mimicry: A Semiotic View of the Evolutionary Dynamics of Mimicry Systems.” Biosemiotics 8 (2015): 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Margulis, Lynn. Symbiotic Planet: A New View of Evolution. New York: Basic Books, 1998.Google Scholar
  45. Marshack, Alexander. The Roots of Civilization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
  46. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Nature: Course Notes from the Collège de France. Compiled and with notes by Dominique Séglard, and translated by Robert Vallier. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Orig. pub. as La Nature: Notes, cours du Collège de France, 1995), 2003.Google Scholar
  47. Noble, Dennis. The Music of Life: Biology Beyond Genes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  48. Nunn, Patrick D., and Nicholas J. Reid. “Aboriginal Memories of Inundation of the Australian Coast Dating from More than 7,000 Years Ago.” Australian Geographer 47, no. 1 (2015): 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1077539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paci, Enzo. The Function of the Sciences and the Meaning of Man. Translated by Paul Piccone. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  50. Portmann, Adolf. (1952) Animal Forms and Patterns (London: Faber and Faber). Orig. Die Tiergestalt 1948.Google Scholar
  51. Reich, David, et al. “Genetic History of an Archaic Hominin Group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.” Nature 468, no. 7327 (2010): 1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richerson, P.J., R. Boyd, and J. Heinrich. “Gene-culture Coevolution in the Age of Genomics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 107, Suppl. 2 (2010): 8985.Google Scholar
  53. Rudwick, Martin. Earth’s Deep History: How It Was Discovered and Why It Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schaeffer, H. Martin, and Graeme D. Ruxton. Plant-Animal Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ———. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, eds. J.R.R. Tolkien and E.V. Gordon. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1925.Google Scholar
  56. Smail, Daniel Lord. On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  57. Ward, Carol V., Craig S. Feibel, Ashley S. Hammond, Louise N. Leakey, Elizabeth A. Moffett, J. Michael Plavcan, Matthew M. Skinner, Fred Spoor, and Meave G. Leakey. “Associated Ilium and Femur from Koobi Fora, Kenya, and Postcranial Diversity in Early Homo.” The Journal of Human Evolution (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/jevol.2015.01.005.
  58. Ward, Peter, and Joe Kirschvink. A New History of Life: The Radical New Discoveries About the Origins and Evolution of Life on Earth. New York: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
  59. Westling, Louise. The Green Breast of the New World: Landscape, Gender, and American Fiction. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  60. ———. The Logos of the Living World: Merleau-Ponty, Animals, and Language. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  61. ———. “Merleau-Ponty and the Eco-Literary Imaginary.” In Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology, ed. Hubert Zapf. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016.Google Scholar
  62. Wheeler, Wendy. The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics, and the Evolution of Culture. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 2006.Google Scholar
  63. Willett, Cynthia. Interspecies Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Westling
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations