Advertisement

Changes in the Norwegian Central Crisis Management After the Terrorist Attacks in 2011

  • Susan B. Jensen
  • Per LægreidEmail author
  • Lise H. Rykkja
Chapter
Part of the New Security Challenges book series (NSECH)

Abstract

This chapter addresses organizational change within the field of societal security in Norway after the terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011, focusing on the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. We describe changes in the internal organization and external relations focusing on formal structure, networks, demography and regulatory arrangements. Structural changes, replacement of executives, regulatory changes and network arrangements have been introduced. The changes have been within the existing administrative order. The ministry’s role as a lead and coordinating ministry has been strengthened, but within the constraints of the principle of ministerial responsibility. The terrorist attack did not lead to a major and immediate change. The changes can instead be understood as gradual institutional change in line with the Norwegian tradition of pragmatic incremental reforms.

References

  1. Ahrne, G., and N. Brunsson. 2011. Organizations Outside Organizations. The Significance of Partial Organizations. Organization 18 (1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, C., and J. Trondal. 2017. Governing Turbulence. An Organizational Institutional Agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. Online first.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansell, C., A. Boin, and M. Farjoun 2015. Dynamic Conservatism. How Institutions Change to Remain the Same. In Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 44, ed. M.S. Karatz. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkland, T. 1998. Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting. Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleikelia. 2012. Justis- og beredskapsdepartementets ansvar for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap. Internal Report. 31 January. Oslo: Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  6. Boin, A., and P. ’t Hart. 2010. Organizing for Effective Emergency Management. Lessons from Research. Australian Journal of Public Administration 69: 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boin, A., and P. ’t Hart. 2015. Learning to Learn from Crisis: The Hardest Challenge? In Organizing After Crises. The Challenges of Learning, ed. N. Schiffoni, L. Taskin, C. Donis, and J. Raone. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Boin, A., and M. Rhinard. 2008. Managing Transboundary Crises: What Role for the European Union? International Studies 10 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  9. Boin, A., A. McConnell, and P. ’t Hart (eds.). 2008. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boin, A., P. ’t Hart, E. Stern, and B. Sundelius. 2005. The Politics of Crisis Management—Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bouckaert, G., B.G. Peters, and K. Verhoest. 2010. Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2008. The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case. Public Organization Review 8 (2): 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, P.G. Roness, and K.A. Røvik. 2007. Organization Theory and the Public Sector. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and L.H. Rykkja. 2015. The Challenges of Coordination in National Security Management—The Case of the Terrorist Attack in Norway. International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (2): 352–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and L.H. Rykkja. 2016. Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy. Public Administration Review 76 (6): 887–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and L.H. Rykkja. 2017. How to Balance Individual Rights and Societal Security? The View of Civil Servants. Paper Presented at the Trans-Atlantic Dialogue (TAD), Subtheme 2  “Maintaining Democratic Values in Challenging Times”, 5–8 April, Miami.Google Scholar
  17. Difi. 2017. Evaluering av tilsyn. Rapport fra tilsyn med samfunnssikkerhet- og beredskapsabeidet i Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet. Oslo: Statens helsetilsyn.Google Scholar
  18. DSB. 2012. Sikkerhet i kritisk infrastruktur og kritiske samfunnsfunksjoner – modell for overordnet risikostyring. KIKS-prosjektet – 1. Delrapport. Tønsberg: DSB.Google Scholar
  19. Egeberg, M. 2004. An Organizational Approach to European Integration: Outline of a Complimentary Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 43: 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Egeberg, M., and J. Trondal. 2015. Why Strong Coordination at One Level of Government Is Incompatible with Strong Coordination Across Levels (And How to Live With It): The Case of The European Union. Public Administration 94 (3): 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fimreite, A.L., P. Lango, P. Lægreid, and L.H. Rykkja. 2014. Organisering for samfunnssikkerhet og krisehåndtering. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  22. Helsetilsynet. 2014. Rapport fra tilsyn med samfunnssikkerhets- og beredskapsarbeidet I Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet. Oslo: Helsetilsynet.Google Scholar
  23. Hjellum, M.S., and P. Lægreid. 2018. The Challenges of Administrative Capacity and Transboundary Coordination. The Case of the Norwegian Police and Military. Working Paper RSCAC 2018/31. Florence: Schuman Centre, Europen University Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Husabø, E.J. 2013. Counterterrorism and the Expansion of Proactive Police Powers in the Nordic States. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 14 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kettl, D. 2004. System Under Stress. Homeland Security and American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koop, C., and M. Lodge. 2014. Exploring the Co-ordination of Economic Regulation. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (9): 1311–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lægreid, P., and L.H. Rykkja. 2014. Coordinating for Crisis Management in Norway After the Terrorist Attack in 2011. In Organizing for Coordination in the Public Sector. Practices and Lessons from 12 European Countries, ed. P. Lægreid, L.H. Rykkja, K. Sarapuu, and T. Ramnda-Liiv. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Lægreid, P., and L.H. Rykkja. 2015. Organizing for ‘Wicked Problems’—Analyzing Coordination Arrangements in Two Policy Areas. International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (6): 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lægreid, P., and S. Serigstad. 2006. Framing the Field of Homeland Security: The Case of Norway. Journal of Management Studies 43 (6): 1395–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Meld. St. 38. 2016–2017. IKT-sikkerhet. Oslo: Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  32. Nilsen, M., E. Albrechtsen, and O.M. Nyheim. 2017. Changes in Norwegian’s Safety and Security Measures Following the 2011 Terror Attacks. Safety Science. Online first.Google Scholar
  33. NOU. 2012: 14. Rapport fra 22. juli-kommisjonen. Oslo: Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  34. NOU. 2015: 13. Digital sårbarhet- sikkerhet samfunn- beskytte enkeltmennesker og samfunn en digitalisert verden. Oslo: Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  35. NOU. 2016: 19. Samhandling for sikkerhet- beskyttelse av grunnleggende samfunnsfunksjoner i en omskiftelig tid. Oslo: Forsvarsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  36. Olsen, J.P. 2017. Democratic Accountability, Political Order, and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Riksrevisjonen. 2015. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av Justis- og beredskapsdepartementets arbeid med samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap. Dokument 3:7 (2014–2015). Oslo: Riksrevisjonen.Google Scholar
  38. Riksrevisjonen. 2016. Riksrevisjonens rapport om revisjon av politiets og forsvarets objektsikring for budsjettåret 2015. Oslo: Riksrevisjonen.Google Scholar
  39. Rittel, H., and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Planning Theory. Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Røksund. 2016. Forsvarets bistand til politiet- rapport fra arbeidsgruppen for utarbeiding av forslag til ny bistandsinstruks. Oslo: Forsvarsdepartementet og Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  41. SMK. 2012. Report of the 22 July Commission, Press Release, 12 August. Oslo: Statsministerens kontor.Google Scholar
  42. Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2005. The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks. Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (3): 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stern, E. 1997. Crisis and Learning: A Conceptual Balance Sheet. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 5 (2): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Streek, W., and K. Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan B. Jensen
    • 1
  • Per Lægreid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lise H. Rykkja
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Administration and Organization TheoryUniversity of Bergen and Uni Research Rokkan CentreBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations