Advertisement

Cross-Cultural Empathy: Learning About Diverse Users in Design Thinking Process

  • Ewa CallahanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 850)

Abstract

This poster explores the concept of cognitive and emotional empathy in the context of Design Thinking process when players come from different cultural backgrounds. It discusses the challenges facing the design teams and addresses differences in visual representations in tools that center on empathy with the user. In the light of cultural theories, especially Geert Hofstede’s dimensions of culture [1, 2], the poster proposes a framework based on cultural theories that facilitate understanding of the design thinking process in cross-cultural context. The emphasis is placed on the creation of the visual tools that facilitate interactions among the members of the design teams, as well as interactions between the design team and the user.

Keywords

Empathy Design Thinking Cross-cultural 

References

  1. 1.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture and Organisations: Software of the Mind. HarperCollins, London (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Köppen, E., Meinel, C.: Empathy via design thinking: creation of sense and knowledge. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds.) Design Thinking Research. UI, pp. 15–28. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06823-7_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasparini, A.: Perspective and use of empathy in design thinking. In: The Eight International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI, pp. 49–54 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liedtka, J.: Perspective: linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(6), 925–938 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christensen, B.T., Ball, L.J., Halskov, K.: Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clemmensen, T., Ranjan, A., Bødker, M.: How cultural knowledge shapes core design thinking—A situation specific analysis. CoDesign, pp. 1–18 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowe, P.: Design Thinking. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelley, T., Littman, J.: The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO’s Strategies for Beating the Devil’s Advocate and Driving Creativity Throughout Your Organization. Doubleday, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown, T.: Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper-Collins, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thoring, K., Luippold, C., Mueller, R.: The impact of cultural differences in design thinking education. In: Design Research Society’s Conference (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonagh, D., Thomas, J.: Rethinking design thinking: empathy supporting innovation. Aust. Med. J. - Health Des. 1 3(8), 458–464 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kroeber, A.L., Kluckhohn, C.: Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology Papers 47 (1952)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ang, S., Van Dyne, L.: Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurements, and Applications. Sharpe, London (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marcus, A., Gould, E.W.: Cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design: What? So what? Now what? In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, 19 June 2000. http://www.amanda.com/resources/hfweb2000/hfweb00.marcus.html. Accessed 15 June 2001
  16. 16.
    Ackerman, S.K.: Mapping user interface design to culture dimensions. In: Paper Presented at International Workshop on Internationalization of Products and Systems, Austin, TX, USA (2002). http://www.iwips2002.org/downloads/AMA_XCult_13Jul02.ppt. Accessed 20 May 2002
  17. 17.
    Callahan, E.: Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university web sites. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 11(1), 239–273 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Quinnipiac UniversityHamdenUSA

Personalised recommendations