Advertisement

The Transition to a New University Campus as an Opportunity for the Urban Regeneration of the Former Milan Expo 2015 Areas

  • Paola Trapani
  • Luisa Collina
  • Barbara Camocini
  • Laura Daglio
  • Martina Mazzarello
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10912)

Abstract

In Milan, in the 1990s, the Ministry of Education and Research inaugurated the policy of opening new decentralised university campuses with a twofold aim: to relieve pressure on the central headquarters and, at the same time, restore functionality and liveliness to the suburban neighbourhoods, which have been affected in the last two decades by the decentralisation of industry. The paper presents a research work still in progress, carried out by a group of the Politecnico di Milano on behalf of the Università degli Studi di Milano, concerning the definition of the meta-project briefing for a new campus to be located on the ex EXPO 2015 area. Although the event was a formidable territorial marketing tool for the city, a new destination for the space occupied by the pavilions must be implemented for the future. The company that owns the area, Arexpo, decides to build a scientific and technological park in which public and private institutions must be housed, including the new campus for the science faculties of the university. The project appears as an opportunity to make a transition to a more environmentally, socially and economically sustainable educational and research site. The Politecnico di Milano research group uses methods at the crossroads between Strategic, Service and Spatial Design to immediately involve the various primary stakeholders in a collaborative project to create the guidelines that will be given to the architects in charge of planning the new site.

Keywords

Transition to sustainable futures Case studies Cross-cultural product and service design Design for social development Localization Participatory design Community engagement Co-design Capability development Human experience sense-making Multidisciplinary research Learning & teaching environments Higher education facilities Meta-design 

References

  1. 1.
    Expo (2015). http://www.expo2015.org/rivivi-expo/. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  2. 2.
    Ordine degli architetti, pianificatori, paesaggisti e conservatori della città di Milano, http://www.ordinearchitetti.mi.it/en/notizie/dettaglio/862. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  3. 3.
    Ceschin, F.: Sustainable Product-Service Systems: Between Strategic Design and Transition Studies, Kindle edn. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03795-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amelar, S.: Taking down the walls. Dialogue n.30 (2016). https://www.gensler.com/research-insight/publications/dialogue/30/taking-down-the-walls. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  5. 5.
    United Nations General Assembly, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome, 60th edn, 38 p. United Nations Millennium Declaration (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stahel, W.R.: The functional economy: cultural and organizational change. In: Richards, D.J. (ed.) The Industrial Green Game. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Visser, F.S., Stappers, P.J., van der Lugt, R., Sanders, E.B.-N.: Contextmapping: experiences from practice. In: CoDesign, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119–149 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bason, C.: Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society. Policy Press, Bristol (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pestoff, V.: Innovations in public services: co-production and new public governance in Europe. In: Towards Peer Production in Public Services: Cases from Finland, pp. 13–33. School of Art, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, Helsinki (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marmot, A.: Educational Innovation through Building Adaptation. Archit. Des. 87, 96–105 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferri, G.: New Urban Body, Exhibition, Triennale di Milano, Milano (2017). http://www.newurbanbody.it/. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  13. 13.
    Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Toward the Circular Economy: Opportunities for the Consumer Goods Sector (2013). http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/business/reports/ce2013. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  14. 14.
    Evans, S., Bergendahl, M.N., Gregory, M., Ryan, C.: Towards a Sustainable Industrial System. With Recommendations for Educations, Research. Industry and Policy. University of Cambridge, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manzini, E.: Design, When Everybody Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Irwin, T., Kossof, G., Tonkinwise, C., Scupelli, P.: Transition Design. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Trapani
    • 1
  • Luisa Collina
    • 1
  • Barbara Camocini
    • 1
  • Laura Daglio
    • 2
  • Martina Mazzarello
    • 1
  1. 1.Design DepartmentPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations