Advertisement

Pelvis and Hip

  • Gregory PereiraEmail author
  • Nikolaos K. Paschos
  • John D. KellyIV
Chapter
Part of the Orthopaedic Study Guide Series book series (ORTHSTUDY)

Abstract

The pelvis is formed by the two innominate bones that articulate posteriorly at the sacrum and anteriorly at the pubic symphysis. These attachments form the pelvic girdle, which links the axial skeleton to the lower extremities of the body. Each innominate bone is formed by the fusion of the ischium, ilium, and ischium that occurs during puberty. The fusion of these three bones forms cup-shaped, anteverted (15°) acetabulum that articulates with the head of the femur to form the diarthrodial hip joint.

Further Readings

  1. Alwattar BJ, Bharam S. Hip arthroscopy portals. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2011;19(2):74–80.Google Scholar
  2. Beckmann N, Cai C. CT characteristics of traumatic sacral fractures in association with pelvic ring injuries: correlation using the Young-Burgess classification system. Emerg Radiol. 2017;24(3):255–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley G, editor. European surgical orthopaedics and traumatology: the EFORT textbook. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  4. Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy utilizing the supine position. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(3):275–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(7):433–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang CY, Huang AJ. MR imaging of normal hip anatomy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013;21(1):1–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole JD, Blum DA, Ansel LJ. Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:160–79.Google Scholar
  8. Dickson KF. Pelvic ring injuries. In: Surgical treatment of orthopedic trauma. New York, NY: Thieme; 2007. p. 448–53.Google Scholar
  9. DiGioia AM, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplast. 2003;18(2):123–8.Google Scholar
  10. Dutton M. Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, and intervention. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. Eto S, et al. The direct anterior approach is associated with early revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(3):1001–5.Google Scholar
  12. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(5):679–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta A, et al. Does primary hip arthroscopy result in improved clinical outcomes? 2-year clinical follow-up on a mixed group of 738 consecutive primary hip arthroscopies performed at a high-volume referral center. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):74–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. Bone Joint J. 1982;64(1):17–9.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes PE, Hsu JC, Matava MJ. Hip anatomy and biomechanics in the athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2002;10(2):103–14.Google Scholar
  16. Kennon R, et al. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. JBJS. 2004;86(suppl_2):91–7.Google Scholar
  17. Leone A, et al. Emergency and trauma of the pelvic ring. In: Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology, vol. 21. No. 03. Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2017.Google Scholar
  18. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis. fourth ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Martin HD, et al. The function of the hip capsular ligaments: a quantitative report. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):188–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meneghini RM, et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Peterson versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miranda MA, et al. Pelvic ring injuries: a long term functional outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:152–9.Google Scholar
  23. Olson SA, Pollak AN. Assessment of pelvic ring stability after injury: indications for surgical stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:15–27.Google Scholar
  24. Pflüger G, Junk-Jantsch S, Schöll V. Minimally invasive total hip replacement via the anterolateral approach in the supine position. Int Orthop. 2007;31(1):7–11.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Robertson WJ, Kelly BT. The safe zone for hip arthroscopy: a cadaveric assessment of central, peripheral, and lateral compartment portal placement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1019–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sampson TG. Complications of hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2001;20(4):831–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Winther SB, et al. Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty: A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(1):22–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vrahas M, et al. Ligamentous contributions to pelvic stability. Orthopedics. 1995;18(3):271–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Pereira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nikolaos K. Paschos
    • 1
    • 2
  • John D. KellyIV
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryBoston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations