Advertisement

Geopolitics, Geoeconomics, and Development Strategies in the New Millennium

  • Carlos Aguiar de Medeiros
  • Numa Mazat
Chapter

Abstract

In the first decade of the twenty-first century, developing countries experienced higher growth and greater geopolitical and geo-economic prominence than developed countries. The economic slowdown during the next decade started to undo at least partially, both the characteristics of decoupling and the South geopolitical strategy. This chapter is an attempt to examine the evolution of the economic, geo-economic, and geopolitical paths followed by the countries of the South in the New Millennium and the geopolitical and geo-economic response of the United States to these more assertive strategies. It also aims to articulate the study of the economic evolution with both internal and external power relations.

References

  1. Akyüz, Yylmaz. 2012. The Boom in Capital Flows to Developing Countries: Will It Go Bust Again? Ekonomi-tek, 1: 63-96.Google Scholar
  2. Amsden, Alice. 2001. The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastos, Pedro Paulo Zaluth, and Célio Hiratuka. 2017. A política econômica externa do governo Dilma Rousseff: comércio, cooperação e dependência. Textos para Discussão, Instituto de Economia, UNICAMP, n° 306.Google Scholar
  4. Blackwill, Robert D., and Jennifer M. Harris. 2016. War by Other Means? Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boron, Atilio. 2013. América Latina en la geopolítica del imperialismo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Luxemburg.Google Scholar
  6. Bracarense, Natália M. 2012. Development Theory and the Cold War: The influence of Politics in Latin American Structuralism. Review of Political Economy 24 (3): 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2010. Globalização e Competição. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.Google Scholar
  8. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, Ha-Joon. 2006. The East Asian Development Experience, the Miracle, the Crisis and the Future. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cui, Shoujoun. 2016. China’s New Commitments to LAC and Its Geopolitical Implications. In China and Latin America in Transition. Policy Dynamics, Economic Commitments, and Social Impacts, ed. Shoujoun Cui and Manuel Pérez García, 15–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Coning, Cedric, Thomas Mandrup, and Liselotte Odgaard. 2015. The BRICS and Coexistence: An Alternative Vision of World Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. De Ville, Ferdi, and Gabriel Siles-Brügge. 2015. TTIP: The Truth About the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Fiori, José Luis. 2004. O poder dos Estados Unidos: formação, expansão e limites. In O poder americano, Fiori (Org.). Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2011. Estado e desenvolvimento, na América Latina. Notas para um novo ‘programa de pesquisa’. (mimeo).Google Scholar
  15. Freitas, Fábio, Carlos Aguiar de Medeiros, and Franklin Serrano. 2016. Regimes de política econômica e o descolamento da tendência de crescimento dos países em desenvolvimento nos anos 2000. In Dimensões estratégicas do desenvolvimento brasileiro. Continuidade e mudança no cenário global: desafios à inserção do Brasil, ed. CGEE, 17–46. Brasília, DF: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE).Google Scholar
  16. Frenkel, Roberto, and Martín Rapetti. 2011. Fragilidad externa o desindustrialización: ¿Cuál es la principal amenaza para América Latina en la próxima década? Serie macroeconomía del desarrollo, CEPAL, no. 116, November.Google Scholar
  17. Furtado, Celso. 1978. Criatividade e dependência na civilização industrial. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2000. Teoria e política do desenvolvimento econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2007. The Oral History Interview, January 7th 2000. In The Complete Oral History Transcripts from UN Voices, CD-ROM. New York: United Nations Intellectual History Project.Google Scholar
  20. Hossein-Zadeh, Ismael. 2007. The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2014. Beyond Mainstream Explanations of the Financial Crisis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kalecki, Michal. 1943 [1990]. Political Aspects of Full Employment. In Collected Works of Michal Kalecki, ed. Jerzy Osiatynski, vol. I, 347–356. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kaplinsky, Raphael, and Dirk Messmer. 2008. Introduction: The Impact of Asian Drivers on the Developing World. World Development 36 (2): 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klinger, Bailey. 2009. Is South-South Trade a Testing Ground for Structural Transformation? Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, no. 40, United Nations.Google Scholar
  25. Kuznets, Simon. 1973. Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. The American Economic Review 63 (3): 247–258.Google Scholar
  26. Lall, Sanjaya. 2000. The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985–98. Oxford Development Studies 28 (3): 337–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lall, Sanjaya, John Weiss, and Hiroshi Oikawa. 2005. China’s Competitive Threat to Latin America: An Analysis for 1990–2002. Oxford Development Studies 33 (2): 163–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leão, Rodrigo Pimentel Ferreira, Aline Regina Alves Martins, and William Vella Nozaki. 2011. A ascenção chinesa e a nova geopolítica e geoeconomia das relações sino-russas. In China na nova configuração global: impactos políticos e econômicos, ed. Luciana Acioly, Rodrigo Pimentel Ferreira Leão, and Eduardo Costa Pinto, 195–234. Brasília: Ipea.Google Scholar
  29. Li, Yuan. 2017. Belt and Road: A Logic Behind the Myth. In China’s Belt and Road: A Game Changer? ed. Alessia Amighini, 13–34. Milan: ISPI.Google Scholar
  30. Lo, Bobo. 2008. Axis of Convenience. Moscow, Beijing and the New Geopolitics. London: Chatham House and Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mazat, Numa, and Franklin Serrano. 2012. A Geopolítica da Federação Russa em Relação aos Estados Unidos e à Europa. In O Renascimento de uma potência? A Rússia no século XXI, ed. André Gustavo de Miranda Pineli Alves, 9–50. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
  32. Medeiros, Carlos Aguiar de. 2004. O desenvolvimento tecnológico americano no pós-guerra como um empreendimento militar. In O poder americano, ed. José Luis Fiori, 225–252. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2011. The Political Economy of Institutional Change and Economic Development in Latin American Economies. Journal of Economic Issues 45 (2): 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2013a. The Political Economy of the Rise and Decline of Developmental States. In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory. Volume Two: Aggregate Demand, Policy Analysis and Growth, ed. Sergio Levrero, Antonella Palumbo, and Antonella Stirati. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2013b. Recursos Naturais, Nacionalismo e Estratégias de Desenvolvimento. Oikos 12 (2): 146–167.Google Scholar
  36. Medeiros, Carlos Aguiar de, and Maria Rita Vital Paganini Cintra. 2015. Impacto da Ascenção Chinesa sobre os Paises Latino-Americanos. Revista de Economia Política 35 (1): 28–42.Google Scholar
  37. Medeiros, Carlos Aguiar de, and Franklin Serrano. 1999. Padrões monetários internacionais e crescimento. In Estados e moedas no desenvolvimento das nações, ed. José Luis Fiori, 119–151. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
  38. Medeiros, Carlos Aguiar de, and Nicholas Trebat. 2014. Military Modernization in Chinese Technical Progress and Industrial Innovation. Review of Political Economy 26 (2): 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2017. Finance, Trade, and Income Distribution in Global Value Chains: Implications for Developing Economies and Latin America. Instituto de Economia, UFRJ, Discussion Paper, 002/2017: Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  40. Milberg, William, and Deborah Winkler. 2013. Outsourcing Economics: Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moniz Bandeira, Luiz Alberto. 2016. A Desordem Mundial. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
  42. Nayyar, Deepak. 2008. Trade and Globalization. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Office of the United States Trade Representative (Executive Office of the President). 2017. Summary of Objectives for the NAFTA Renegotiation. Monday, July 17, 2017. Accessed https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/NAFTAObjectives.pdf.
  44. Palley, Thomas. 2015. The US Economy: Explaining Stagnation and Why It Will Persist. Accessed http://www.thomaspalley.com/docs/research/Interpretations%20of%20the%20Crisis%20-%20WEBSITE.pdf.
  45. Panitch, Leo. 2015. BRICS, the G20 and the American Empire. In BRICS. An Anti-Capitalist Critique, ed. Patrick Bond and Ana Garcia. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  46. Panitch, Leo, and Sam Gindin. 2012. The Making of Global Capitalism. The Political Economy of American Empire. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Petras, James, and Henry Veltmeyer. 2016. Power and Resistance, US Imperialism in Latin America. Boston, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  48. Prebisch, Raúl. 1949a [2000]. O Desenvolvimento Econômico da América Latina e alguns de seus principais problemas. In Cinquenta Anos de Pensamento da Cepal, ed. Ricardo Bielschowsky, 69–136. Rio de Janeiro: Record/CEPAL.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 1949b [1993]. Teoría Dinámica de la Economía (con Especial Aplicación a las Economías Latinoamericanas). In Raúl Prebisch. Obras 1919–1948, Vol. IV. Buenos Aires: Fundación Raúl Prebisch.Google Scholar
  50. President of the United States. 2017. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Accessed https://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.
  51. Rodriguez, Octavio. 2006. El Estructuralismo Latinoamericano. México, D.F: Siglo XXI/CEPAL.Google Scholar
  52. Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryner, Magnus, and Alan Cafuny. 2017. The European Union and Global Capitalism: Origins, Development and Crisis. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  54. Sakwa, Richard. 2015. Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  55. Serrano, Franklin. 2003. From ‘Static’ Gold to the Floating Dollar. Contributions to Political Economy 22 (1): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. 2013. Continuity and Change in the International Economic Order: Towards a Sraffian Interpretation of the Change in the Trend of ‘Commodity’ Prices in the 2000s. In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory. Volume Two: Aggregate Demand, Policy Analysis and Growth, ed. Sergio Levrero, Antonella Palumbo, and Antonella Stirati. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Serrano, Franklin, and Ricardo Summa. 2015. Aggregate Demand and the Slowdown of Brazilian Economic Growth from 2011–2014. Washington: CEPR.Google Scholar
  58. Sunkel, Osvaldo. 1970 [2000]. Desenvolvimento, Subdesenvolvimento, Dependência, Marginalização e Desigualdades Espaciais: Por um enfoque totalizante. In Cinquenta Anos de Pensamento da Cepal, ed. Ricardo Bielschowsky, 521–566. Rio de Janeiro: Record/CEPAL.Google Scholar
  59. Tavares, Maria da Conceição. 1964. Da Substituição de Importações ao Capitalismo Financeiro. Ensaios sobre Economia Brasileira. Zahar: Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  60. Tellis, Ashley J. 2014. Balancing Without Containment: An American Strategy for Managing China. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  61. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Weisbrot, Mark. 2015. Failed. What the ‘Experts’ Got Wrong About the Global Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ———. 2016. The Brazilian Coup and Washington “Rollback” in Latin America. Washington: CEPR.Google Scholar

Data Bases

  1. IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2017. International Financial Statistics. Available at: http://data.imf.org/?sk=5DABAFF2-C5AD-4D27-A175-1253419C02D1&ss=1409151240976.
  2. SIPRI. 2017. Military Expenditure Database. Available at: http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database.
  3. UNCTAD. 2017. UNCTADstat. Available at: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Aguiar de Medeiros
    • 1
  • Numa Mazat
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations