Advertisement

Cellulose Based Green Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal from Wastewater

  • Anitha George Varghese
  • Sherely Annie Paul
  • M. S. Latha
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 19)

Abstract

Water pollution is a major problem affecting people across the world. Heavy metals and dyes are major pollutants that pose potential threat to the health of humans and ecosystems. Several treatment technologies are available to reduce the pollutant concentration in water and wastewater. However, many of these processes are costly, have high energy requirements and generate toxic sludge and wastes that need to be carefully disposed. Addressing these problems invoked the need for green methods that are more efficient, cost effective and environment friendly for water purification. Adsorption is regarded as a green, clean and versatile method for wastewater treatment. Cellulose based materials attained considerable attention for water purification because of its abundant availability, biodegradability and non-toxic nature. This chapter reviews the application of cellulose based materials and their modified forms as adsorbents for the removal of dyes and toxic heavy metals from wastewater. The adsorption efficiency of green adsorbents, cellulose based green adsorbents and their modified forms are compared. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent is enhanced by reducing the cellulosic dimension to the nanolevel. Moreover, further chemical modification of nanocellulose adsorbents result in maximum adsorption.

Keywords

Adsorption Green adsorbents Cellulose Nanocellulose Heavy metal Dye 

References

  1. Abdel-Raouf MS, Abdul-Raheim ARM (2017) Removal of heavy metals from industrial waste water by biomass-based materials: a review. J Pollut Eff Cont 5:180.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdolali A, Guo WS, Ngo HH et al (2014) Typical lignocellulosic wastes and by-products for biosorption process in water and wastewater treatment: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 160:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aderhold D, Williams CJ, Edyvean RGJ (1996) The removal of heavy-metal ions by seaweeds and their derivatives. Bioresour Technol 58:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00072-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akkaya G, Uzun İ, Güzel F (2007) Kinetics of the adsorption of reactive dyes by chitin. Dyes Pigments 73:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alencar WS, Acayanka E, Lima EC et al (2012) Application of Mangifera indica (mango) seeds as a biosorbent for removal of Victazol Orange 3R dye from aqueous solution and study of the biosorption mechanism. Chem Eng J 209:577–588.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali I, Gupta VK (2006) Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc 1:2661–2667.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen SJ, Mckay G, Porter JF (2004) Adsorption isotherm models for basic dye adsorption by peat in single and binary component systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 280:322–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alomá I, Martín-Lara MA, Rodríguez IL et al (2012) Removal of nickel (II) ions from aqueous solutions by biosorption on sugarcane bagasse. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 43:275–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2011.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anirudhan TS, Nima J, Divya PL (2013) Adsorption of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions by glycidylmethacrylate-grafted-densified cellulose with quaternary ammonium groups. Appl Surf Sci 279:441–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Annadurai G, Chellapandian M, Krishnan MRV (1999) Adsorption of reactive dye on chitin. Environ Monit Assess 59:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Annadurai G, Juang RS, Lee DJ (2003) Adsorption of heavy metals from water using banana and orange peels. Water Sci Technol 47:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Arami M, Limaee NY, Mahmoodi NM, Tabrizi NS (2005) Removal of dyes from colored textile wastewater by orange peel adsorbent: equilibrium and kinetic studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 288:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Asgher M, Bhatti HN (2012) Removal of reactive blue 19 and reactive blue 49 textile dyes by citrus waste biomass from aqueous solution: equilibrium and kinetic study. Can J Chem Eng 90:412–419.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Aziz HA, Adlan MN, Ariffin KS (2008) Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu and Cr (III)) removal from water in Malaysia: post treatment by high quality limestone. Bioresour Technol 99:1578–1583.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Aziz A, Ouali MS, Elandaloussi EH et al (2009) Chemically modified olive stone: a low-cost sorbent for heavy metals and basic dyes removal from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 163:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater 97:219–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00263-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bao-Xiu Z, Peng W, Tong Z et al (2006) Preparation and adsorption performance of a cellulosic-adsorbent resin for copper (II). J Appl Polym Sci 99:2951–2956.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Barka N, Ouzaouit K, Abdennouri M, El Makhfouk M (2013) Dried prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) cladodes as a low-cost and eco-friendly biosorbent for dyes removal from aqueous solutions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Batmaz R, Mohammed N, Zaman M et al (2014) Cellulose nanocrystals as promising adsorbents for the removal of cationic dyes. Cellulose 21:1655–1665.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0168-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2010) Utilization of agro-industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment-a review. Chem Eng J 157:277–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bhattacharya AK, Naiya TK, Mandal SN, Das SK (2008) Adsorption, kinetics and equilibrium studies on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using different low-cost adsorbents. Chem Eng J 137:529–541Google Scholar
  23. Biçak N, Sherrington DC, Senkal BF (1999) Graft copolymer of acrylamide onto cellulose as mercury selective sorbent. React Funct Polym 41:69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(99)00021-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang M-Y, Juang R-S (2004) Adsorption of tannic acid, humic acid, and dyes from water using the composite of chitosan and activated clay. J Colloid Interface Sci 278:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chong HLH, Chia PS, Ahmad MN (2013) The adsorption of heavy metal by Bornean oil palm shell and its potential application as constructed wetland media. Bioresour Technol 130:181–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crini G (2006) Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review. Bioresour Technol 97:1061–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dhir B, Kumar R (2010) Adsorption of heavy metals by Salvinia biomass and agricultural residues. Int J Environ Res 4:427–432Google Scholar
  28. Dialynas E, Diamadopoulos E (2009) Integration of a membrane bioreactor coupled with reverse osmosis for advanced treatment of municipal wastewater. Desalination 238:302–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.01.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. El Haddad M, Mamouni R, Saffaj N, Lazar S (2016) Evaluation of performance of animal bone meal as a new low cost adsorbent for the removal of a cationic dye Rhodamine B from aqueous solutions. J Saudi Chem Soc 20:S53–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. El-Mekkawi D, Galal HR (2013) Removal of a synthetic dye “Direct Fast Blue B2RL” via adsorption and photocatalytic degradation using low cost rutile and Degussa P25 titanium dioxide. J Hydro Environ Res 7:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eyley S, Thielemans W (2011) Imidazolium grafted cellulose nanocrystals for ion exchange applications. Chem Commun 47:4177–4179.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CC05359GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Faust SD, Aly OM (1981) Chemistry of natural waters. Butterworths/Ann Arbor Science Book, Boston, p 400Google Scholar
  33. Ferrero F (2007) Dye removal by low cost adsorbents: hazelnut shells in comparison with wood sawdust. J Hazard Mater 142:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geay M, Marchetti V, Clément A et al (2000) Decontamination of synthetic solutions containing heavy metals using chemically modified sawdusts bearing polyacrylic acid chains. J Wood Sci 46:331–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goel NK, Kumar V, Misra N, Varshney L (2015) Cellulose based cationic adsorbent fabricated via radiation grafting process for treatment of dyes waste water. Carbohydr Polym 132:444–451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Güçlü G, Gürdağ G, Özgümüş S (2003) Competitive removal of heavy metal ions by cellulose graft copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci 90:2034–2039.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gurgel LVA, de Melo JCP, de Lena JC, Gil LF (2009) Adsorption of chromium (VI) ion from aqueous solution by succinylated mercerized cellulose functionalized with quaternary ammonium groups. Bioresour Technol 100:3214–3220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hajeeth T, Vijayalakshmi K, Gomathi T, Sudha PN (2013) Removal of Cu (II) and Ni (II) using cellulose extracted from sisal fiber and cellulose-g-acrylic acid copolymer. Int J Biol Macromol 62:59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.08.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hameed BH (2008) Equilibrium and kinetic studies of methyl violet sorption by agricultural waste. J Hazard Mater 154:204–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hameed BH (2009a) Evaluation of papaya seeds as a novel non-conventional low-cost adsorbent for removal of methylene blue. J Hazard Mater 162:939–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hameed BH (2009b) Grass waste: a novel sorbent for the removal of basic dye from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 166:233–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hameed BH (2009c) Spent tea leaves: a new non-conventional and low-cost adsorbent for removal of basic dye from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 161:753–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. He X, Male KB, Nesterenko PN et al (2013) Adsorption and desorption of methylene blue on porous carbon monoliths and nanocrystalline cellulose. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:8796–8804.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am403222uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hokkanen S, Repo E, Sillanpää M (2013) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by succinic anhydride modified mercerized nanocellulose. Chem Eng J 223:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hokkanen S, Repo E, Suopajärvi T et al (2014) Adsorption of Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by amino modified nanostructured microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 21:1471–1487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0240-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hossain MA, Ngo HH, Guo WS et al (2014) Performance of cabbage and cauliflower wastes for heavy metals removal. Desalin Water Treat 52:844–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hu D, Wang P, Li J, Wang L (2014) Functionalization of microcrystalline cellulose with n, n-dimethyldodecylamine for the removal of congo red dye from an aqueous solution. Bioresources 9:5951–5962Google Scholar
  49. Huang J, Liu Y, Jin Q et al (2007) Adsorption studies of a water soluble dye, Reactive Red MF-3B, using sonication-surfactant-modified attapulgite clay. J Hazard Mater 143:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hunger K (2003) Health and safety aspects. In: Industrial dyes chemistry, properties, applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 625–641Google Scholar
  51. Iqbal M, Saeed A, Zafar SI (2009) FTIR spectrophotometry, kinetics and adsorption isotherms modeling, ion exchange, and EDX analysis for understanding the mechanism of Cd2+ and Pb2+ removal by mango peel waste. J Hazard Mater 164:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Isa MH, Lang LS, Asaari FAH et al (2007) Low cost removal of disperse dyes from aqueous solution using palm ash. Dyes Pigments 74:446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jalali M, Aboulghazi F (2013) Sunflower stalk, an agricultural waste, as an adsorbent for the removal of lead and cadmium from aqueous solutions. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 15:548–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jin L, Li W, Xu Q, Sun Q (2015a) Amino-functionalized nanocrystalline cellulose as an adsorbent for anionic dyes. Cellulose 22:2443–2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jin L, Sun Q, Xu Q, Xu Y (2015b) Adsorptive removal of anionic dyes from aqueous solutions using microgel based on nanocellulose and polyvinylamine. Bioresour Technol 197:348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Khosravi M, Rakhshaee R (2005) Biosorption of Pb, Cd, Cu and Zn from the wastewater by treated Azolla filiculoides with H2O2/MgCl2. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ku Y, Jung I-L (2001) Photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide. Water Res 35:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kubota H, Shigehisa Y (1995) Introduction of amidoxime groups into cellulose and its ability to adsorb metal ions. J Appl Polym Sci 56:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kubota H, Suzuki S (1995) Comparative examinations of reactivity of grafted celluloses prepared by uv-and ceric salt-initiated graftings. Eur Polym J 31:701–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kumar GV, Ramalingam P, Kim MJ et al (2010) Removal of acid dye (violet 54) and adsorption kinetics model of using musa spp. waste: a low-cost natural sorbent material. Korean J Chem Eng 27:1469–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lam E, Male KB, Chong JH et al (2012) Applications of functionalized and nanoparticle-modified nanocrystalline cellulose. Trends Biotechnol 30:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Leung ACW, Hrapovic S, Lam E et al (2011) Characteristics and properties of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals prepared from a novel one-step procedure. Small 7:302–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu P, Zhang L (2007) Adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions or suspensions with clay nano-adsorbents. Sep Purif Technol 58:32–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Liu M, Zhang H, Zhang X et al (2001) Removal and recovery of chromium (III) from aqueous solutions by a spheroidal cellulose adsorbent. Water Environ Res 73:322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liu J, Guo D, Zhou Y et al (2011) Identification of ancient textiles from Yingpan, Xinjiang, by multiple analytical techniques. J Archaeol Sci 38:1763–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Liu P, Sehaqui H, Tingaut P, Wichser A, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2014) Cellulose and chitin nanomaterials for capturing silver ions (Ag+) from water via surface adsorption. Cellulose 21:449–461.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0139-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Liu P, Borrell PF, Božič M (2015) Nanocelluloses and their phosphorylated derivatives for selective adsorption of Ag+, Cu2+ and Fe3+ from industrial effluents. J Hazard Mater 294:177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.001
  69. Low KS, Lee CK, Mak SM (2004) Sorption of copper and lead by citric acid modified wood. Wood Sci Technol 38:629–640.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-003-0201-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ma H, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2011) Ultrafine cellulose nanofibers as efficient adsorbents for removal of UO22+ in water. ACS Macro Lett 1:213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mahfoudhi N, Boufi S (2017) Nanocellulose as a novel nanostructured adsorbent for environmental remediation: a review. Cellulose 24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1194-0
  72. Malik DS, Jain CK, Yadav AK (2016) Removal of heavy metals from emerging cellulosic low-cost adsorbents: a review. Appl Water Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0401-8
  73. Maranon E, Suárez F, Alonso F, Fernández Y, Sastre H (1999) Preliminary study of iron removal from hydrochloric pickling liquor by ion exchange. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:2782–2786.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9806895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mautner A, Maples HA, Kobkeatthawin T, Kokol V, Karim Z, Li K, Bismarck A (2016) Phosphorylated nanocellulose papers for copper adsorption from aqueous solutions. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1861–1872.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1026-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McKay G, Porter JF, Prasad GR (1999) The removal of dye colours from aqueous solutions by adsorption on low-cost materials. Water Air Soil Pollut 114:423–438.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005197308228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McMullan G, Meehan C, Conneely A, Kirby N, Robinson T, Nigam P, Banat I, Marchant R, Smyth WF (2001) Microbial decolourisation and degradation of textile dyes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:81–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Melo JCP, Silva Filho EC, Santana SAA, Airoldi C (2011) Synthesized cellulose/succinic anhydride as an ion exchanger. Calorimetry of divalent cations in aqueous suspension. Thermochim Acta 524:29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Memon SQ, Memon N, Shah SW, Khuhawar MY, Bhanger MI (2007) Sawdust—a green and economical sorbent for the removal of cadmium (II) ions. J Hazard Mater 139:116–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Memon JR, Memon SQ, Bhanger MI, Memon GZ, El-Turki A, Allen GC (2008) Characterization of banana peel by scanning electron microscopy and FT-IR spectroscopy and its use for cadmium removal. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 66:260–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Memon JR, Memon SQ, Bhanger MI, El-Turki A, Hallam KR, Allen GC (2009) Banana peel: a green and economical sorbent for the selective removal of Cr (VI) from industrial wastewater. Colloids surf B Biointerfaces 70:232–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.12.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Meshko V, Markovska L, Mincheva M, Rodrigues AE (2001) Adsorption of basic dyes on granular acivated carbon and natural zeolite. Water Res 35:3357–3366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00056-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Midha V, Dey A (2008) Biological treatment of tannery wastewater for sulfide removal. Int J Chem Sci 6:472–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Min SH, Han JS, Shin EW, Park JK (2004) Improvement of cadmium ion removal by base treatment of juniper fiber. Water Res 38:1289–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mohmood I, Lopes CB, Lopes I et al (2013) Nanoscale materials and their use in water contaminants removal—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1239–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1415-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mondal DK, Nandi BK, Purkait MK (2013) Removal of mercury (II) from aqueous solution using bamboo leaf powder: equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies. J Environ Chem Eng 1:891–898.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.07.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Musyoka SM, Mittal H, Mishra SB, Ngila JC (2014) Effect of functionalization on the adsorption capacity of cellulose for the removal of methyl violet. Int J Biol Macromol 65:389–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Namasivayam C, Muniasamy N, Gayatri K, Rani M, Ranganathan K (1996) Removal of dyes from aqueous solutions by cellulosic waste orange peel. Bioresour Technol 57:37–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(96)00044-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nasernejad B, Zadeh TE, Pour BB, Bygi ME, Zamani A (2005) Camparison for biosorption modeling of heavy metals (Cr (III), cu (II), Zn (II)) adsorption from wastewater by carrot residues. Process Biochem 40:1319–1322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Navarro RR, Sumi K, Matsumura M (1999) Improved metal affinity of chelating adsorbents through graft polymerization. Water Res 33:2037–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. O’Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer TF (2008) Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:6709–6724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pan BC, Xiong Y, Su Q, Li AM, Chen JL, Zhang QX (2003) Role of amination of a polymeric adsorbent on phenol adsorption from aqueous solution. Chemosphere 51:953–962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00038-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pei A, Butchosa N, Berglund LA, Zhou Q (2013) Surface quaternized cellulose nanofibrils with high water absorbency and adsorption capacity for anionic dyes. Soft Matter 9:2047–2055.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM27344FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pérez-Marín AB, Zapata VM, Ortuno JF, Aguilar M, Sáez J, Lloréns M (2007) Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange waste. J Hazard Mater 139:122–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pillai SS, Deepa B, Abraham E, Girija N, Geetha P, Jacob L, Koshy M (2013) Biosorption of Cd (II) from aqueous solution using xanthated nano banana cellulose: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 98:352–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Qiao H, Zhou Y, Yu F, Wang E, Min Y, Huang Q, Pang L, Ma T (2015) Effective removal of cationic dyes using carboxylate-functionalized cellulose nanocrystals. Chemosphere 141:297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Li Q (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47:3931–3946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rai HS, Bhattacharyya MS, Singh J, Bansal TK, Vats P, Banerjee UC (2005) Removal of dyes from the effluent of textile and dyestuff manufacturing industry: a review of emerging techniques with reference to biological treatment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 35:219–238.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380590917932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roy A, Chakraborty S, Kundu SP et al (2013) Lignocellulosic jute fiber as a bioadsorbent for the removal of azo dye from its aqueous solution: batch and column studies. J Appl Polym Sci 129:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400236sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Safa Y, Bhatti HN, Bhatti IA, Asgher M (2011) Removal of direct Red-31 and direct Orange-26 by low cost rice husk: influence of immobilisation and pretreatments. Can J Chem Eng 89:1554–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Saha R, Mukherjee K, Saha I et al (2013) Removal of hexavalent chromium from water by adsorption on mosambi (Citrus limetta) peel. Res Chem Intermed 39:2245–2257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-012-0754-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Saito T, Isogai A (2005) Ion-exchange behavior of carboxylate groups in fibrous cellulose oxidized by the TEMPO-mediated system. Carbohydr Polym 61:183–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Salam OEA, Reiad NA, ElShafei MM (2011) A study of the removal characteristics of heavy metals from wastewater by low-cost adsorbents. J Adv Res 2:297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Saliba R, Gauthier H, Gauthier R (2005) Adsorption of heavy metal ions on virgin and chemically-modified lignocellulosic materials. Adsorpt Sci Technol 23:313–322.  https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617054770039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Saravanan R, Ravikumar L (2015) The use of new chemically modified cellulose for heavy metal ion adsorption and antimicrobial activities. J Water Resour Prot 7:530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Saravanan R, Ravikumar L (2016) Cellulose bearing Schiff base and carboxylic acid chelating groups: a low cost and green adsorbent for heavy metal ion removal from aqueous solution. Water Sci Technol 74:1780–1792.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Šćiban M, Klašnja M, Škrbić B (2006) Modified softwood sawdust as adsorbent of heavy metal ions from water. J Hazard Mater 136:266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sehaqui H, de Larraya UP, Liu P, Sehaqui H, de Larraya UP, Liu P, Pfenninger N, Mathew AP, Zimmermann T, Tingaut P (2014) Enhancing adsorption of heavy metal ions onto biobased nanofibers from waste pulp residues for application in wastewater treatment. Cellulose 21:2831–2844.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0310-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sharma P, Kaur H, Sharma M, Sahore V (2011) A review on applicability of naturally available adsorbents for the removal of hazardous dyes from aqueous waste. Environ Monit Assess 183:151–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1914-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sheikhi A, Safari S, Yang H, van de Ven TGM (2015) Copper removal using electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:11301–11308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Shen W, Chen S, Shi S, Li X, Zhang X, Hu W, Wang H (2009) Adsorption of Cu (II) and Pb (II) onto diethylenetriamine-bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 75:110–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shukla SR, Pai RS (2005) Adsorption of Cu (II), Ni (II) and Zn (II) on modified jute fibres. Bioresour Technol 96:1430–1438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Silva LS, Lima LCB, Silva FC et al (2013) Dye anionic sorption in aqueous solution onto a cellulose surface chemically modified with aminoethanethiol. Chem Eng J 218:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sirviö JA, Hasa T, Leiviskä T et al (2016) Bisphosphonate nanocellulose in the removal of vanadium (V) from water. Cellulose 23:689–697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0819-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sivaraj R, Namasivayam C, Kadirvelu K (2001) Orange peel as an adsorbent in the removal of acid violet 17 (acid dye) from aqueous solutions. Waste Manag 21:105–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00076-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Sobhanardakani S, Parvizimosaed H, Olyaie E (2013) Heavy metals removal from wastewaters using organic solid waste—rice husk. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:5265–5271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1516-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sonune A, Ghate R (2004) Developments in wastewater treatment methods. Desalination 167:55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sud D, Mahajan G, Kaur MP (2008) Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions–a review. Bioresour Technol 99:6017–6027.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sun C, Ni J, Zhao C et al (2017) Preparation of a cellulosic adsorbent by functionalization with pyridone diacid for removal of Pb (II) and Co (II) from aqueous solutions. Cellulose 24:5615–5624.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1519-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tahir SS, Rauf N (2006) Removal of a cationic dye from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto bentonite clay. Chemosphere 63:1842–1848.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.10.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tan KB, Vakili M, Horri BA, Poh PE, Abdullah AZ, Salamatinia B (2015) Adsorption of dyes by nanomaterials: recent developments and adsorption mechanisms. Sep Purif Technol 150:229–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Tan KB, Abdullah AZ, Horri BA, Salamatinia B (2016) Adsorption mechanism of microcrystalline cellulose as green adsorbent for the removal of cationic methylene blue dye. J Chem Soc Pak 38:651–664Google Scholar
  122. Tashiro K, Kobayashi M (1991) Theoretical evaluation of three-dimensional elastic constants of native and regenerated celluloses: role of hydrogen bonds. Polymer (Guildf) 32:1516–1526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(91)90435-LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Velazquez-Jimenez LH, Pavlick A, Rangel-Mendez JR (2013) Chemical characterization of raw and treated agave bagasse and its potential as adsorbent of metal cations from water. Ind Crop Prod 43:200–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wang LK, Hung Y-T, Shammas NK (2005) Physicochemical treatment processes. The Humana Press Inc., Totowa. ISBN 978-1-59259-820-5Google Scholar
  125. Yu X, Tong S, Ge M, Wu L, Zuo J, Cao C, Song W (2013) Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals. J Environ Sci 25:933–943.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60145-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Yu J, Wang L, Chi R et al (2015) Adsorption of Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ from aqueous solution by modified sugarcane bagasse. Res Chem Intermed 41:1525–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-013-1290-1
  127. Yu H-Y, Zhang D-Z, Lu F-F, Yao J (2016) New approach for single-step extraction of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals for their use as adsorbents and flocculants. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:2632–2643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zhang G, Yi L, Deng H, Sun P (2014a) Dyes adsorption using a synthetic carboxymethyl cellulose-acrylic acid adsorbent. J Environ Sci 26:1203–1211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60513-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Zhang X, Zhao J, Cheng L, Lu C, Wang Y, He X, Zhang W (2014b) Acrylic acid grafted and acrylic acid/sodium humate grafted bamboo cellulose nanofibers for Cu2+ adsorption. RSC Adv 4:55195–55201.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA08307ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Zhang N, Zang G-L, Shi C, Yu HQ, Sheng GP (2016) A novel adsorbent TEMPO-mediated oxidized cellulose nanofibrils modified with PEI: preparation, characterization, and application for Cu (II) removal. J Hazard Mater 316:11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zhao M, Liu P (2008) Adsorption behavior of methylene blue on halloysite nanotubes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 112:419–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.10.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zheng L, Dang Z, Yi X, Zhang H (2010) Equilibrium and kinetic studies of adsorption of Cd (II) from aqueous solution using modified corn stalk. J Hazard Mater 176:650–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zhou Y, Zhang M, Hu X, Wang X, Niu J, Ma T (2013) Adsorption of cationic dyes on a cellulose-based multicarboxyl adsorbent. J Chem Eng Data 58:413–421.  https://doi.org/10.1021/je301140cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zhu W, Liu L, Liao Q, Chen X, Qian Z, Shen J, Liang J, Yao J (2016) Functionalization of cellulose with hyperbranched polyethylenimine for selective dye adsorption and separation. Cellulose 23:3785–3797.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1045-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anitha George Varghese
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sherely Annie Paul
    • 2
  • M. S. Latha
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryMar Thoma CollegeTiruvallaIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryBishop Moore CollegeMavelikaraIndia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistrySree Narayana CollegeChengannurIndia

Personalised recommendations