Advertisement

Nature, Kant, and God

  • Gordon GrahamEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 5)

Abstract

This paper draws on some lines of thought in Kant’s Critique of Judgment to construct an aesthetic counterpart to the moral argument for the existence of God that Kant formulates in the Critique of Practical Reason. The paper offers this aesthetic version as a theistic way of explaining how the natural world can be thought valuable independently of human desires and purposes. It further argues that such an argument must commend itself to anyone who is as deeply committed to the preservation of nature as to the promotion of justice.

Keywords

Intrinsic value Natural magnificence Kantian sublime Shallow ecology God and aesthetics 

References

  1. Aquinas, Thomas. 1963. Summa Theologica, Volume 2: Existence and nature of God. Trans. O.P. Timothy McDermott. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
  2. Callicott, J. Baird. 1985. Intrinsic value, quantum theory, and environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 7: 257–275.  https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19857334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham, Gordon. 2001. Evil and Christian ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Harman, Gilbert. 1967. Toward a theory of intrinsic value. Journal of Philosophy 6: 792–804.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2024086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurka, Thomas. 1998. Two kinds of organic unity. The Journal of Ethics 2: 299–320.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009795120631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Rethinking intrinsic value. The Journal of Ethics 2: 277–297.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009782403793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel. 1956. Critique of practical reason. Trans. Lewis White Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1998. Groundwork to the metaphysics of morals. Trans. Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809590.004.
  9. ———. 2000. Critique of the power of judgment. Trans. Paul Guyer, and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656.
  10. Korsgaard, Christine. 1983. Two distinctions in goodness. Philosophical Review 92: 169–195.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2184924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovelock, James. 2006. The revenge of Gaia: Earth’s climate crisis and the fate of humanity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Naess, Arne. 1973. The shallow and deep long-range ecology movement. Inquiry 16: 95–100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1990. Twilight of the idols. Trans. R.J. Hollingdale. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  14. Wielenberg, Eric. 1998. Goodness without qualification. Journal of Value Inquiry 17: 93–104.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004211725065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Princeton Theological SeminaryPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations