Advertisement

Response: The Hermeneutics of Suffering, Creation Order, and Modern Society

  • Govert J. BuijsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 5)

Abstract

In this response to the contribution of Zuidervaart, the idea of creation order, which is an important element in the Kuyper-tradition and which Zuidervaart criticizes, is defended. However, the grounds for this defense that are offered here, are not often called upon in relation to the idea of creation order: our human experiences of suffering. They may give us a hermeneutical witness to something like “creation order.” For suffering to be experienced as suffering, a goodness has to be presupposed as ontologically prior. It is argued that, ethically speaking, restoring the goodness of creation (including its developmental potential) is to be preferred above an ethic that is composed in an eschatological key. Zuidervaart’s terminology of “macrostructures” is questioned for systematic reasons but the critical impetus of the terminology is acclaimed especially for its connection to “societal principles” that may give orientation to our actions in the late-modern world.

Keywords

Creation order Suffering Kuyper Macrostructures 

References

  1. Ekman, P. 2003. Emotions revealed. Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
  2. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Layard, R., and A. Hagel. 2015. Healthy young minds: Transforming the mental health of children. In World happiness report 2015, 106–130. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  4. Marion, J.-L. 2002. In excess. Studies of saturated phenomena. Trans. Robyn Horder and Vincent Berraud. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  5. McCloskey, Deirdre. 2006–2016. The bourgeois era. (3 vols.: The Bourgeois virtues, Bourgeois dignity and Bourgeois equality), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Wolterstorff, N. 2008. Justice. Rights and Wrongs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities, Department of PhilosophyVU AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations