Advertisement

XronoMorph: Investigating Paths Through Rhythmic Space

  • Andrew J. MilneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

XronoMorph is a musical loop generator that opens up two huge spaces of unusual and interesting polyphonic rhythms: perfectly balanced rhythms and well-formed rhythms. These are rhythms that would often be hard to create in alternative software applications or with traditional musical notation. In this chapter, I explain the algorithmic principles used to generate the loops and how these principles have been parameterized and visualized to facilitate the exploration of paths within these two rhythmic spaces.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. Andrew Milne is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Award (project number DE170100353) funded by the Australian Government.

References

  1. Amiot E (2007) David Lewin and maximally even sets. J Math Music 1(3):157–172MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arom S (1991) African polyphony and polyrhythm: musical structure and methodology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berstel J, Lauve A, Reutenauer C, Saliola FV (2008) Combinatorics on words: Christoffel words and repetitions in words. American Mathematical Society, Providence(RI)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carey N, Clampitt D (1989) Aspects of well-formed scales. Music Theory Spectr 11(2):187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clough J, Douthett J (1991) Maximally even sets. J Music Theory 35(1/2):93–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton TJ, Doai J, Milne AJ, Saisanas V, Calilhanna A, Hilton C, Goldwater M, Cohn R (2018) Teaching mathematics with music: A pilot study. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE 2018), University of Wollongong, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofstadter DR (1985) Metamagical themas: questing for the essence of mind and pattern. Basic Books, New York(NY)Google Scholar
  8. Kilchenmann L, Senn O (2015) Microtiming in swing and funk affects the body movement behavior of music expert listeners. Front Psychol 6(1232)Google Scholar
  9. London J (2004) Hearing in time: psychological aspects of musical meter. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Milne AJ (2018) Linking sonic aesthetics with mathematical theories. In: McLean A, Dean RT (eds) The Oxford handbook of algorithmic music. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 155–180Google Scholar
  11. Milne AJ, Bulger D, Herff SA (2018) Exploring the space of perfectly balanced rhythms and scales. J Math Music 11(2)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Milne AJ, Bulger D, Herff SA, Sethares WA (2015) Perfect balance: A novel principle for the construction of musical scales and meters. In: Collins T, Meredith D, Volk A (eds) Mathematics and computation in music. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milne AJ, Dean RT (2016) Computational creation and morphing of multilevel rhythms by control of evenness. Comput Music J 40(1):35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milne AJ et al (2011) Scratching the scale labyrinth. In: Amiot E et al (eds) Mathematics and computation in music. Springer, Berlin, pp 180–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milne AJ et al (2016) XronoMorph: algorithmic generation of perfectly balanced and well-formed rhythms. In: Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (NIME 2016), Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Toussaint GT (2013) The geometry of musical rhythm: what makes a “good” rhythm good?. CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and DevelopmentWestern Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations