Advertisement

A Knowledge Graph for Eldercare: Constructing a Domain Entity Graph with Guidelines

  • You Duan
  • Pin Ji
  • Liuqi Jin
  • Anning Zou
  • Jiaoyun Yang
  • Hong Xie
  • Ning An
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10927)

Abstract

The sheer size of aging population and the complexity of individual eldercare needs have put great social and economic burdens on various societies worldwide. Particularly, the daunting demands for caring for elders are unmet by the overall supply of caring capacities. There are at least two aspects of this imbalance: first, the number of high quality caring professionals with nursing backgrounds have been insufficient and this trend will continue in the near future; second, most of the current professional and semi-professional caregivers have limited education that in turn limited their caring capacities. To tackle these issues with the rapid development of data science and growing awareness of nursing informatics, we are working on building a knowledge graph for eldercare. In this paper, we propose the concrete first step towards this goal: constructing an eldercare entity graph based on international guidelines, and this is first of its kind to our best knowledge. Protégé is used to construct the entity graph that consists of eight types of entities and four types of relationships. In this graph, a standard eldercare procedure is represented as a path between an entity denoting an eldercare service classification and an entity denoting an eldercare activity. About 230 procedures could be derived according to the guidelines.

Keywords

Knowledge graph Entity graph Eldercare Guideline 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71661167004), National University Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (No. 201710359069), and the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. B14025).

References

  1. 1.
    Lu, C.H., Hsiao, J.L., Chen, R.F.: Factors determining nurse acceptance of hospital information systems. Comput. Inform. Nurs. Cin. 30(5), 257–264 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ammenwerth, E., Rauchegger, F., Ehlers, F., Hirsch, B., Schaubmayr, C.: Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: an evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(1), 25–38 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodwin, T., Harabagiu, S.M.: Automatic generation of a qualified medical knowledge graph and its usage for retrieving patient cohorts from electronic medical records. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, Irvine, CA, USA, pp. 363–370. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    He, J.: Hospital informatization promotes the nursing management. Mod. Clin. Nurs. 4 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu, T., Liu, J., Jia, L., Gao, B., Li, J.: Construction and applications of a large-scale knowledge graph for traditional Chinese medicine (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, X., Liu, G., Ling, A., Zhan, J., An, N., Li, L., Sha, Y.: Building a practical ontology for emergency response systems. In: 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Wuhan, China, pp. 222–225. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Z.Z., Chu, D.H., Jia, Z.P., Shen, J.Q., Wang, L.: Two-stage approach for reliable dynamic Web service composition. Knowl. Based Syst. 97(C), 123–143 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, Z.Z., Chu, D.H., Song, C., Xue, X., Lu, B.Y.: Social learning optimization (SLO) algorithm paradigm and its application in QoS-aware cloud service composition. Inf. Sci. Int. J. 326(C), 315–333 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blok, H.E.: Knowledge Graph Framing and Exploitation. Master’s thesis, University of Twente, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hulliyah, K., Kusuma, H.T.: Application of knowledge graph for making text summarization (Analizing a text of educational issues). In: 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World, Rabat, Morocco, pp. E79–E83. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paparrizos, J., White, R.W., Horvitz, E.: Screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using signals from web search logs: feasibility study and results. J. Oncol. Pract. 12(8), 737–744 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang, H., Ng, J.H.K.: Googling for a diagnosis–use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study. BMJ 333(7579), 1143–1145 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White, R.W., Horvitz, E.: Cyberchondria: studies of the escalation of medical concerns in Web search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 27(4), 1–37 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Groopman, J.E.: How doctors think. JAMA 298(6), 685–690 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barnett, G.O., Cimino, J.J., Hupp, J.A., Hoffer, E.P.: DXplain. An evolving diagnostic decision-support system. JAMA 258(1), 67 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bizer, C., Tom, H., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data: the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Law, V., Knox, C., Djoumbou, Y., Jewison, T., Guo, A.C., Liu, Y., Maciejewski, A., Arndt, D., Wilson, M., Neveu, V., Tang, A., Gabriel, G., Ly, C., Adamjee, S., Dame, Z.T., Han, B., Zhou, Y., Wishart, D.S.: DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(D1), D1091–D1097 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schriml, L.M., Arze, C., Nadendla, S., Chang, Y.W., Mazaitis, M., Felix, V., Feng, G., Kibbe, W.A.: Disease Ontology: a backbone for disease semantic integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 40(D1), D940–D946 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dumontier, M., Callahan, A., Cruz-Toledo, J., Ansell, P., Emonet, V., Belleau, F., Droit, A.: Bio2RDF release 3: a larger connected network of linked data for the life sciences. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 401–404. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen, B., Dong, X., Jiao, D., Wang, H., Zhu, Q., Ding, Y., Wild, D.J.: Chem2Bio2RDF: a semantic framework for linking and data mining chemogenomic and systems chemical biology data. BMC Bioinform. 11(1), 255 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rotmensch, M., Halpern, Y., Tlimat, A., Horng, S., Sontag, D.: Learning a health knowledge graph from electronic medical records. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 5994 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shi, L., Li, S., Yang, X., Qi, J., Pan, G., Zhou, B.: Semantic health knowledge graph: semantic integration of heterogeneous medical knowledge and services. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017(4), 1–12 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    An, N., Jiang, L., Wang, J., Luo, P., Wang, M., Li, B.N.: Toward detection of aliases without string similarity. Inf. Sci. 261, 89–100 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • You Duan
    • 1
  • Pin Ji
    • 2
  • Liuqi Jin
    • 3
  • Anning Zou
    • 3
  • Jiaoyun Yang
    • 3
  • Hong Xie
    • 4
  • Ning An
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Industrial and Equipment TechnologyHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  2. 2.School of SoftwareHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  3. 3.School of Computer and InformationHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  4. 4.School of NursingPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations