Senior Citizens Usage Towards and Perception of Modern Technology in India

  • J. Antony WilliamEmail author
  • Ramaswami Murugesh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10926)


India is the second largest populated country and one the fast growing developing countries in the world. As we grow up and getting older, problems associated with aging is increasing rapidly – medical, biological, psychological, economic, and social etc. Population ageing and growing number of elderly population demands for healthcare and technology enabled-services. Factors associated with ageing population are essential for to ensure progress in development and sustainability. In response to the rapid population growth, the industry and market for older adults is growing with the introduction of new technology-enabled products and services. The advancement of technology and technology-enabled services are proliferating. However, their rate of adaption is very low. As the society is progressively moving towards digital, there is an increasing risk of excluding users with particular access needs. Among those at risk of digital exclusion are many older people and other differently-abled people for whom the technology is difficult to access. We foresee a great challenge in identifying factors affecting older people adopting new technologies and provide support to aging. To assess senior citizens usage towards and perception of modern technology in India, a survey was conducted with a random sample of 25 participants over 60 years of age using smart phone and living in Bengaluru city. The survey was carried out individually face to face followed by semi-structured interviews. The participants expressed that they are not scared and hesitant to use technology. They are also aware of the value of new technologies and show their willingness to adopt, if it improves their quality of life with security. The implications of the results are discussed in this paper.


Senior citizen Population aging Technology adoption Technology usage Assistive technology Technology perception 



The authors are grateful to the Department of Computer Application, Madurai Kamaraj University and National Institute of Design for providing an opportunity and guidance. We express our sincere thanks to all the senior citizens who participated in the research for their patience, cooperation and support.


  1. Cerella, J.: Information processing rates in the elderly, Psychol. Bull. 98(1), 67–83 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Milne, S., Dickinson, A., Carmichael, A., Sloan, D., Eisma, R., Gregor, P.: Are guidelines enough? An introduction to designing web sites accessible to older people. IBM Syst. J. 44(3), 557–571 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Page, T.: Touchscreen mobile devices and older adults: a usability study. Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. 3(1), 65–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadda, R.K., Deb, K.S.: Indian family systems, collectivistic society and psychotherapy. Indian J. Psychother. 55(6), 299–309 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pavel, M., Jimison, H., Hayes, T., Kaye, J.: Technology in support of successful aging. Bridge– Linking Eng. Soc. 39(1), 5–12 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1710–1721 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleck, R.: Rating reflection on experience: a case study of teachers and tutors reflection around images. Interact. Comput. 24(6), 439–498 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elsevier, B.V.: Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interact. Comput. 17(5), 485–505 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Demiris, G., Rantz, M.J., Aud, M.A., Marek, K.D., Tyrer, H.W., Skubic, M., Hussam, A.A.: Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 29(2), 87–94 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stray, C., Peschl, M.F.: Representation still matters: cognitive science and user interface design. Behav. Inform. Technol. 17(6), 338–360 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.M.: Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83, 235–248 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birren, J.E., Fisher, L.M.: Aging and speed of behaviour: possible consequences for psychological functioning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46, 329–353 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czaja, S.J.: The impact of aging on access to technology. Accessibility Comput. 83, 7–11 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plazaa, I., Martína, L., Martinb, S., Medranoa, C.: Mobile applications in an aging society: status and trends. J. Syst. Softw. 84, 1977–1988 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Birren, J.E., Morrison, D.F.: Analysis of the WAIS subtests in relation to age and educational. J. Gerontol. 16, 363–368 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barnarda, Y., Bradleyb, M.D., Hodgsona, F., Lloydc, A.D.: Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation band usability. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1715–1724 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. Baltes, P.B., Lindenberger, U.: Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive ageing. Psychol. Ageing 12, 12–21 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Arab, F., Malik, Y., Abdulrazak, B.: Evaluation of phon age: an adapted smartphone interface for elderly people. Interact 2013, 547–554 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. Hofer, S.M., Alwin, D.F.: Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Sage Publications, California (2008)Google Scholar
  21. Subaiya, L., Dhananjay, W.: Demographics of Population Ageing in India. Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, United Nations Population Fund, New Delhi, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi (2011)Google Scholar
  22. O’Brien, M.A., Olson, K.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Understanding technology usage in older adults. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Society for Gerontechnology, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Culén, A.L., Bratteteig, T.: Touch-screens and elderly users: a perfect match? In: ACHI 2013 The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, France (2013)Google Scholar
  24. Chernbumroong, S., Atkins, A.S., Yu, H.: Perception of smart home technologies to assist elderly people. In: The 4th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA 2010), Bhutan (2010)Google Scholar
  25. Borah, H., Shukla, P., Jain, K., Kumar, S.P., Prakash, S., Gajrana, K.R.: Elderly in India. Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi (2011)Google Scholar
  26. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospects. United Nations, New York (2015a)Google Scholar
  27. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Ageing. United Nations, New York (2015b)Google Scholar
  28. Bangalore Metropolitan Region Authority, Bangalore Metropolitan Region Revised Structure Plan-2031, Bengaluru (2017)Google Scholar
  29. UN World Population Prospects 2017. Profiles. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  30. Population Reference Bureau. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
  31. Population Census 2011. Accessed 30 Jan 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ApplicationMadurai Kamaraj UniversityMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations