Advertisement

Critical Theory Derailed: Paradigm Fetishism and Critical Liberalism in Honneth (and Habermas)

  • Harry F. Dahms
Chapter
Part of the Political Philosophy and Public Purpose book series (POPHPUPU)

Abstract

Despite Honneth’s claim to have advanced critical theory not just beyond the early Frankfurt School especially of Horkheimer, Marcuse, and Adorno, but also of Jürgen Habermas, the specific configuration and overall orientation of his theory of recognition should be understood as an instance of traditional rather than critical theory, even though he retains elements of the latter. This applies especially insofar as Honneth appears not to have examined how the concrete socio-historical circumstances in West Germany, especially from 1949 until 1990, shaped and continue to be reflected in his own theoretical agenda. Judged on its own terms, and evaluated and interpreted according to its own standards, Honneth’s theory constitutes an undeniable achievement. Yet, as Honneth declared in an interview he gave in 2000, he did not think of himself as a social theorist. Indeed, if judged in terms of critical theory, especially if we take as the “gold standard” for the latter the writings by Horkheimer, Marcuse, and Adorno during the 1930s and the 1940s, Honneth’s theory of recognition should be recognized as a systematic effort to develop critical liberalism as a positive rather than critical political philosophy.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey (2013) The Dark Side of Modernity. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Assheuer, Thomas, “Der Vorwaertsverteidiger.” DIE ZEIT, June 6, 2009, 50–51.Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus, Hans-Georg (2011) Dialektik der Wertform: Untersuchungen zur marxschen Ökonomiekritik. 2nd ed. Freiburg: Ça ira.Google Scholar
  4. Basaure, Mauro, Jan Philipp Reemtsma and Rasmus Willig (2009) (eds.) Erneuerung der Kritik: Axel Honneth im Gespräch. Frankfurt/M.: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bonefeld, Werner (2014) Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Brunkhorst, Hauke (2005) Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, Deborah (2012) Adorno, Habermas and the Search for a Rational Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dahmer, Helmut (1994) Pseudonatur und Kritik: Freud, Marx und die Gegenwart. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Dahms, Harry F. (1997) “Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukács and Habermas.” Sociological Theory, vol. 15, no. 3: 181–214 (see also Ch. 3 in Dahms 2011).Google Scholar
  10. Dahms, Harry F. (1998) “Beyond the Carousel of Reification: Critical Social Theory After Lukács, Adorno and Habermas.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 18: 3–62.Google Scholar
  11. Dahms, Harry F. (2005) “Globalization or Hyper-Alienation? Critiques of Traditional Marxism as Arguments for Basic Income.” In Jennifer M. Lehmann (ed.) Social Theory as Politics in Knowledge (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 23). Bingley, UK: Emerald, 205–276 (see also Ch. 4 in Dahms, 2011).Google Scholar
  12. Dahms, Harry F. (2006) “Does Alienation Have a Future? Recapturing the Core of Critical Theory.” In Lauren Langman and Devorah K. Fishman (eds.) The Evolution of Alienation: Trauma, Promise, and the Millennium. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 23–46 (see also Ch. 5 in Dahms, 2011).Google Scholar
  13. Dahms, Harry F. (2011) The Vitality of Critical Theory. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  14. Dahms, Harry F. (2017a) “Critical Theory in the Twenty-First Century: The Logic of Capital Between Classical Social Theory, the Early Frankfurt School Critique of Political Economy, and the Prospect of Artifice.” In Dan Krier and Mark Worrell (eds.) The Social Ontology of Capitalism. New York: Palgrave, 47–74.Google Scholar
  15. Dahms, Harry F. (2017b) “Critical Theory as Radical Comparative-Historical Research.” In M. Thompson (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory. Houndmills: Palgrave, 165–184.Google Scholar
  16. Dahms, Harry F. (2017c) “Critical Theory, Brexit, and the Vicissitudes of Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century.” In William Outhwaite (ed.) Brexit: Sociological Perspectives. London: Anthem Press, 183–192.Google Scholar
  17. Dahms, Harry F. (2019) Modern Society as Artifice: Critical Theory and the Logic of Capital. London: Routledge, in preparation.Google Scholar
  18. Elbe, Ingo (2010) Marx im Westen: Die Neue Marx-Lektüre in der Bundesrepublik seit 1965. Berlin: Oldenbourg Akademieverlag.Google Scholar
  19. Fromm, Erich (1955) The Sane Society. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  20. Gerhards, Juergen (2010) “Kritik des „linguistic turn“ in der soziologischen Theoriebildung.” In Anne Honer, Michael Meuser, and Michaela Pfadenhauer (eds.) Fragile Sozialität Inszenierungen, Sinnwelten, Existenzbastlern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften, 409–432.Google Scholar
  21. Habermas, Jürgen (1981/1984) The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society). Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, Jürgen (1981/1987) The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. II: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason). Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, Jürgen (1986) “Eine Art Schadenabwicklung: Die apologetischen Tendenzen in der deutschen Zeitgeschichtsschreibung.” DIE ZEIT, July 18.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. “Arbeit, Liebe, Anerkennung: Der Philosophy wird 60. Eine Gedankenreise von Marx zu Hegel nach Frankfurt und wieder zurück.” DIE ZEIT 30, July 16, 2009. Retrieved on April 8, 2018. http://www.zeit.de/2009/30/Philosoph-Honneth.
  25. Hacke, Jürgen (2006) Philosophie der Bürgerlichkeit: Die liberalkonservative Begründung der Bundesrepublik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  26. Heilbroner, Robert L. (1986) The Nature and Logic of Capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Hobsbawm, Eric (1989) The Age of Empire, 1875–1914. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  28. Honneth, Axel (1992/1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Honneth, Axel (2009) Reification: A Look at an Old Idea, with Judith Butler, Raymond Geuss, and Jonathan Lear, ed. Martin Jay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Honneth, Axel (2011/2014) Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by Joseph Ganahl. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Horkheimer, Max (1937/1972) “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In Critical Theory: Selected Writings. Translated by M. J. O’Connell. New York: The Seabury Press, 188–243.Google Scholar
  32. Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno (1944/2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Translated by E. Jephcotted, ed. Gunzelin Schmid Noer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jalata, Asafa and Harry F. Dahms (2015) “Theorizing Modern Society as an Inverted Reality: How Critical Theory and Indigenous Critiques of Globalization Must Learn from Each Other.” In Harry F. Dahms (ed.) Globalization, Critique, and Social Theory: Diagnoses and Challenges (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 33). Bingley: Emerald, 75–133.Google Scholar
  34. Joas, Hans and Wolfgang Knöbl (2004/2009) Social Theory: Twenty Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jouet, Mugambi (2017) Exceptional America: What Divides Americans from the World and from Each Other. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kirchhoff, Christine, et al. (2004) Gesellschaft als Verkehrung: Perspektiven einer neuen Marx-Lektüre. Freiburg: Ça Ira.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962/2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Larsen, Neil, N. M. Nilges, J. Robinson, and N. Brown (eds.) (2014) Marxism and the Critique of Value. Chicago: MCM Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Lukács, Georg (1923/1971) History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by R. Livingstone. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mignolo, Walter (2003) The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Müller-Doohm, S. (2015) “Member of a School or Exponent of a Paradigm? Jürgen Habermas and Critical Theory” (trans. William Outhwaite). European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 2: 252–274.Google Scholar
  42. Postone, Moishe (1993) Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rahden, Till von. “Der letzte Frankfurter.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 27, 2018. Retrieved on April 6, 2018. http://plus.faz.net/faz-plus/feuilleton/2018-03-27/5018cfa1a42da5bf9984da686b38fd42/.
  44. Reichelt, Helmut (2013) Neue Marx-Lektüre. Zur Kritik sozialwissenschaftlicher Logik, 2nd ed. Freiburg: Ça Ira.Google Scholar
  45. Rosa, Hartmut (2005/2015) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Translated by J. Trejo-Mathys. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Specter, Matthew (2010) Habermas: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wellmer, Albrecht (1998) “The Significance of the Frankfurt School Today: Five Theses (1986).” In Endgames: The Irreconcilable Nature of Modernity: Essays and Lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press, 251–262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry F. Dahms
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations