Advertisement

Losing Sight of Power: The Inadequacy of Axel Honneth’s Theory of the Market and Democracy

  • Gregory R. Smulewicz-Zucker
Chapter
Part of the Political Philosophy and Public Purpose book series (POPHPUPU)

Abstract

In Freedom’s Right, Axel Honneth develops a novel argument for a theory of social freedom. This conception of social freedom places special emphasis on the normative resources provided by market society and a Deweyan conception of democracy. In this chapter, I raise the question of whether or not Honneth’s privileging of the normative content of market society neglects the ways in which the structure of the modern economy can subvert democracy. Specifically, I suggest that the “misdeveloped” norms of the modern manifestations of the economy might actually socialize people in ways that stifle subjectivity and reconcile them to anti-democratic social hierarchies. In raising these concerns about Honneth’s theory of the market and the democratic order to which he thinks we ought to aspire, I draw on the work of John Dewey, Robert Dahl, and Charles Lindblom to point to the anti-democratic dimensions of the modern economy.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Elizabeth (2017) Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blyth, Mark (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dahl, Robert A (1985) A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dewey, John (1944) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, John (2000) Liberalism and Social Action. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  6. Honneth, Axel (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Joel Anderson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Honneth, Axel (2007) Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Translated by John Farrell. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Honneth, Axel (2012) The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Translated by Joseph Ganahl. Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  9. Honneth, Axel (2014) Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by Joseph Ganahl. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Honneth, Axel (2016) “Neoliberalismus?: Eine skeptische Wortdmeldung anlässlich einer Studie von David M. Kotz.” WestEnd: Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, vol. 13, no. 1: 167–179.Google Scholar
  11. Honneth, Axel (2017) The Idea of Socialism: Towards a Renewal. Translated by Joseph Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lindblom, Charles E (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. McNay, Lois (2008) Against Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mirowski, Philip and Dieter Plehwe, eds. (2015) The Road from Mount Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Stedman-Jones, Daniel (2014) Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Teixera, Mariana (2017) “The Sociological Roots and Deficits of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition.” In The Handbook of Critical Theory, edited by Michael J. Thompson, 587–609. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Thompson, Michael J (2016) The Domestication of Critical Theory. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  18. Whitebook, Joel (2001) “Mutual Recognition and the Work of the Negative.” In Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory, Essays in Honor of Thomas McCarthy, edited by Wilhelm Rehg and James Bohman, 257–291. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations