The Mill on the Floss and the Revision of Tragedy

  • K. M. Newton


Many critics have seen Eliot as a tragic novelist, especially in The Mill on the Floss. Though the tragic is an essential concept for Eliot, to be sustainable in the modern post-Darwin era it is argued that she believes it must be revised and even democratized. Time is a crucial element in the novel’s revisionary concept of the tragic. Negative criticism of the Mill has been so sustained because that has not been sufficiently taken into account in previous criticism. How the Mill’s revisionary concept of tragedy is played out both philosophically and artistically is explored through a detailed analysis of the central relationships in the text.


  1. A. S. Byatt (ed.), ‘Introduction to George Eliot,’ in The Mill and the Floss (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979).Google Scholar
  2. Felicia Bonaparte, Will and Destiny: Morality and Tragedy in George Eliot’s Novels (New York: New York University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  3. Elizabeth Ermarth, ‘Maggie Tulliver’s Long Suicide,’ Studies in English Literature 14 (1974): 587–601.Google Scholar
  4. Avrom Fleishman, George Eliot’s Intellectual Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  5. Barbara Hardy, The Novels of George Eliot: A Study in Form (London: Athlone Press, 1959).Google Scholar
  6. Margaret Harris and Judith Johnston (eds.), The Journals of George Eliot (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  7. John Holstrom and Laurence Lerner (eds.), George Eliot and Her Readers: A Selection of Contemporary Reviews (London: The Bodley Head, 1966).Google Scholar
  8. K. M. Newton, Modern Literature and the Tragic (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  9. ———, ‘Tragedy and the Novel,’ in Thomas Hardy in Context, ed. Phillip Mallett (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 122–31.Google Scholar
  10. Elaine Showalter, A Literature of Their Own (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  11. George Steiner, The Death of Tragedy (London: Faber and Faber, 1963).Google Scholar
  12. Anthony Trollope and Barchester Towers (eds.), Michael Sadleir and Frederick Page (Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics, 1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Newton
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations