Advertisement

Saramago’s Dogs: For an Inclusive Humanism

  • Carlo Salzani
  • Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte
Chapter

Abstract

Saramago’s privileged relationship with his dogs goes way beyond biographical trivia and was artistically sublimated into a highly symbolic function in his writings: dogs appear in many of his novels, and in some of them, they ascend to the rank of central characters. If the dogs always play a positive role, their presence is however charged with symbolism, and their philosophical and artistic functions need to be unpacked. This chapter presents a phenomenology of Saramago’s dogs, arguing that they not only constitute a powerful and captivating artistic device but also endow his work with a strong politico-philosophical charge that at times even transcends the author’s intentions.

Keywords

José Saramago Dogs Critique of humanism Anthropocentrism 

Works Cited

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Trans. Kevin Attell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aryan, Arya, and Zohreh Helali. 2012. Animal Imagery in Jose Saramago’s Blindness. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 2 (1): 63–72.Google Scholar
  3. Bolt, David. 2007. Saramago’s Blindness: Humans or Animals? The Explicator 66 (1): 44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Céu e Silva, João. 2009. Uma longa viagem com José Saramago. Oporto: Porto Editora.Google Scholar
  5. Chevalier, Jean, and Alain Gheerbrant. 1997. The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols. Trans. John Buchanan-Brown. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Cirlot, J.E. 2001. A Dictionary of Symbols, 2nd edn. Trans. Jack Sage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Coetzee, J.M. 1999. The Lives of Animals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, Kevin L. 2006. Saramago’s Blindness. The Explicator 64 (2): 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Almeida Martins, Susana Cristina. 2014. (Hum)animalidades na ficção de José Saramago. Master’s Thesis, Universidade de Aveiro.Google Scholar
  10. del Río, Pilar. 2012. Ha muerto Camoens, el perro que inspiró a Saramago. Fundação José Saramago. http://espanol.josesaramago.org/117274.html. Accessed 24 July, 2017.
  11. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Trans. David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gómez Aguilera, Fernando, ed. 2010. José Saramago. Nas Suas Palavras. Lisbon: Caminho.Google Scholar
  14. Grossegesse, Orlando. 1999. Saramago Lesen: Werk, Leben, Bibliographie. Berlin: tranvía Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Haraway, Donna J. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, Martin. 1992. Parmenides. Trans. André Schuwer and Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kuzniar, Alice A. 2006. Melancholia’s Dog: Reflections on Our Animal Kinship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. La Prensa. 2003. ‘Encuentro en los perros más humanidad que en el hombre’: Saramago. http://impresa.prensa.com/opinion/Encuentro-perros-humanidad-hombre-Saramago_0_924657802.html. Accessed 31 July 2017.
  21. Le Guin, Ursula K. 2016. Examples of Dignity: Thoughts on the Work of José Saramago. In Words Are My Matter: Writings About Life and Books, 2000–2016, With a Journal of a Writer’s Week, 151–164. Easthampton: Small Beer Press.Google Scholar
  22. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990. The Name of a Dog, or Natural Rights. In Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism, 151–153. Trans. Seán Hand. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Machado, Cassiano Elek. 2004. José Saramago combate ‘cegueira’ com votos em branco. Interview with José Saramago. Folha de S. Paulo, March 22, 2004. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/ilustrada/ult90u42623.shtml. Accessed 26 July 2017.
  24. Macho, Thomas. 2013. Tiere, Menschen, Machinen. Für einen inkusiven Humanismus. In Tiere. Der Mensch und seine Natur, ed. Konrad Paul Liessmann, 153–173. Vienna: Paul Zsolnay Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Martos, Horacio. 2012. Saramago y los perros. Este Pais. http://archivo.estepais.com/site/2012/saramago-y-los-perros/. Accessed 31 July 2017.
  26. McHugh, Susan. 2004. Dog. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  27. Nashef, Hania A.M. 2010. Becomings in J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians and José Saramago’s Blindness. Comparative Literature Studies 47 (1): 21–41.Google Scholar
  28. Rilke, Rainer Maria. 2005. Duino Elegies and the Sonnets to Orpheus. Trans. A. Poulin, Jr. Boston/New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  29. Vicente, Kyldes Batista. 2001. Forma e motivo do simbólico em José Saramago: a imagem do cão em A jangada de Pedra, História do cerco de Lisboa e Ensaio sobre a Cegueira. http://www.geocities.ws/ail_br/formaemotivodosimbolico.html. Accessed 25 July 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Salzani
    • 1
  • Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Independent ScholarMunsterGermany
  2. 2.University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  3. 3.Pontifical University AntonianumRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations