Advertisement

“Wherever We Would Go, We Would Be Together” The Challenges for Queer Refugee Couples Claiming Joint Asylum in Canada

  • Katherine Fobear
Chapter

Abstract

Scholars note that immigration in North America and Western Europe has been heavily regulated by heteronormative and patriarchal norms which have historically denied immigration to lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) couples. While the research regarding how LGBTQ individuals navigate the immigration process in Canada has increased, there remains little investigation into the asylum experiences of LGBTQ couples who file jointly. This is a serious oversight, as a significant number of asylum claims are joint claims by LGBTQ refugee couples. This chapter questions the reasoning behind the challenges to queer refugee couples’ claims during the migration and asylum process and argues that it is the intersection of gender and sexuality behind the vulnerability of queer asylum claimants both within their countries of origin and when they are seeking asylum. The chapter focuses on narratives of two queer refugee couples who made joint claims in Vancouver, British Columbia. I follow their experiences prior to migrating to Canada through their asylum hearing. Their stories reveal underlying heteronormative and culturally-biased institutional and social barriers LGBTQ refugee couples face in escaping persecution and having both their relationships and need for asylum recognized by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada.

Keywords

Queer Heteronormativity Asylum Migration 

References

  1. Andrijasevic, R. (2009). Sex on the move: Gender, subjectivity and differential inclusion. Subjectivity, 29, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atak, I., Hudson, G., & Nakache, D. (2018). The securitisation of Canada’s refugee system: Reviewing the unintended consequences of the 2012 reform. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 37(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornstein, K. (2016). Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Dawson, C. (2014). Refugee hotels: The discourse of hospitality and the rise of immigration detention in Canada. University of Toronto Quarterly, 83(4), 826–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Genova, N. (2010). The queer politics of migration: Reflections on “illegality” and incorrigibility. Studies in Social Justice, 4(2), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaucher, M., & DeGagne, A. (2014). Guilty until proven persecuted: The Canadian state’s assessment of sexual minority refugee claimants and the invisibility of the non-Western sexual non-citizen. Social Politics, 23(20), 459–481.Google Scholar
  7. Hersh, N. (2015). Challenges to assessing same-sex relationships under refugee law in Canada. McGill Law Journal, 60(3), 527–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jantzi, M. (2015). ‘Stranger Danger’: A critical discourse analysis of the immigration and refugee protection act. Major Research Papers. Paper 6. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://scholars.wlu.ca/soci_mrp/6
  9. Jordan, S. (2010). Un/settling: A critical ethnographic inquiry into settlement by refugees making claims based on sexual orientation or gender identity persecution. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.  https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0053652
  10. Kahn, S. (2015). Cast out: “Gender role outlaws” seeking asylum in the West and the quest for social connections. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(1), 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keenan, S. (2011). Safe spaces for dykes in danger? Refugee law’s production of vulnerable lesbians. In S. FitzGerald (Ed.), Regulating the international movement of women: From protection to control (pp. 29–47). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. LaViolette, N. (2014). Sexual orientation, gender identity and the refugee determination process in Canada. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 4(2), 68–123.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, R. (2010). The cultural politics of lesbian asylum. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(3–4), 424–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, R. (2014). “Gay? Prove it”: The politics of queer anti-deportation activism. Sexualities, 17(8), 958–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morrissey, C., & Jordan, S. (2013). “On what grounds?” LGBTQ asylum claims in Canada. Forced Migration Review, 42, 13–15.Google Scholar
  16. Murray, D. A. (2014). The challenge of home for sexual orientation and gendered identity refugees in Toronto. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes, 48(1), 132–152.Google Scholar
  17. Murray, D. (2017). The homonational archive: Sexual orientation and gendered identity refugee documentation in Canada and the USA. Ethnos, 82(3), 520–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neilson, V. (2005). Homosexual or female-applying gender-based asylum jurisprudence to lesbian asylum claims. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 16, 417–445.Google Scholar
  19. Razack, S. (Ed.). (2002). Race, space, and the law: Unmapping a white settler society. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  20. Seitz, D. (2017). Limbo life in Canada’s waiting room: asylum-seeker as queer subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), 438–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. White, M. (2014). Archives of intimacy and trauma: Queer migration documents as technologies of affect. Radical History Review, 120, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilets, J. D. (1997). Conceptualizing private violence against sexual minorities as gendered violence: An international and comparative perspective. Albany Law Review, 60, 990–1049.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations