Advertisement

Empirical Model

  • Hanna Makhavikova
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

In this chapter we go on to test the hypotheses about FDI in the CEECs empirically. We employed panel data models to the CEE members and candidate countries of the EU during the period 1992–2015. The countries covered were Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, TFYR Macedonia, and Ukraine.

The first empirical part of the chapter describes the factors of the empirical model. In the second part, its robustness is checked, and in the third results are discussed. In the fourth section, we made an attempt to identify the main differences of FDI’s impact on different sub-regions and time periods.

References

  1. Agarwal JP (1997) European integration and German FDI: implications for domestic investment and Central European economies. Natl Inst Econ Rev 160:100–111 http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/National-Institute-Economic-Review/56908891.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn SC, Moon H (2002) Large-N and large-T properties of panel data estimators and the Hausman test. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpd:pd2002:a6-2
  3. Altomonte C (1998) FDI in the CEEC’s and the theory of real options: an empirical assessment. https://ideas.repec.org/p/lic/licosd/7698.html
  4. Altomonte C (2007) Regional economic integration and the location of multinational firms. Rev World Econ 143(2):277–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altomonte C, Guagliano C (2001) Competing locations? Market potential and FDI in Central and Eastern Europe vs the Mediterranean. https://ideas.repec.org/p/lic/licosd/10801.html
  6. Altomonte C, Guagliano C (2003) Comparative study of FDI in Central and Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean. Econ Syst 27(2):223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Altzinger W, Bellak C (1999) Direct versus indirect FDI: impact on home country exports an employment—Empirical evidence for Austrian FDI in CEECs. Globalisation 1999:131–154Google Scholar
  8. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data. Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. In: The review of economic studies, vol 194, pp 277–297Google Scholar
  9. Asiedu E (2002) On the determinants of foreign direct investment to developing countries: is Africa different? World Dev 30(1):107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atkinson AC (1987) Plots, transformations, and regression: an introduction to graphical methods of diagnostic regression analysis. Clarendon Pr, Oxford. ISBN: 0198533713Google Scholar
  11. Baltagi BH, Li Q (1995) Testing AR(1) against MA(1) disturbances in an error component model. J Econ 68(1):133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01646-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benacek V, Gronicki M, Holland D, Sass M (2000) The determinants and impact of foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: a comparison of survey and econometric evidence. Transl Corp 9(3):163–212 http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/5953/Google Scholar
  13. Bera AK, Walter SE, Yoon MJ (2001) Tests for the error component model in the presence of local misspecification. J Econ 101(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berglof E, Bolton P (2002) The great divide and beyond: financial architecture in transition. J Econ Perspect 16(1):77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berglöf E, Roland G (1997) The EU as an “outside anchor” for transition reforms. SITE working paperGoogle Scholar
  16. Bevan AA, Estrin S (2000) The determinants of foreign direct investment in transition economies, 2638Google Scholar
  17. Bevan AA, Estrin S (2004) The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. J Comp Econ 32(4):775–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blonigen BA, Davies RB, Waddell GR, Naughton HT (2007) FDI in space. Spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment. Eur Econ Rev 51(5):1303–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bos J, van de Laar M (2004) Explaining foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: an extended gravity approach, 8Google Scholar
  20. Brenton P (1999) Removing obstacles to deeper economic integration in the broad European trade area: Report of the CEPS working party on trade and investment in an enlarging Europe. CEPS, Brussels. ISBN: 9290792574Google Scholar
  21. Brenton P, DiMauro F, Lücke M (1998) Economic integration and FDI: an empirical analysis of foreign investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kie:kieliw:890
  22. Carstensen K, Toubal F (2004) Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: a dynamic panel analysis. J Comp Econ 32(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clark P, Crawford C, Steele F, Vignoles A (2010) The choice between fixed and random effects models: some considerations for educational research. CMPO, BristolGoogle Scholar
  24. Clausing K, Dorobantu C (2005) Re-entering Europe: does European Union candidacy boost foreign direct investment? Econ Transit 13(1):77–103 http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:etrans:v:13:y:2005:i:1:p:77-103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cook RD, Weisberg S (1999) Applied regression including computing and graphics. Wiley, New York, NY. ISBN: 9780471317111. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/wiley037/99017200.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cragg JG, Donald SG (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econ Theory 9:222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Croissant Y, Millo G (2008) Panel data econometrics in R: the plm package. J Stat Softw 27(2)Google Scholar
  28. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunning JH (1973) The determinants of international production. Oxf Econ Pap 25(3):289–336 http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:25:y:1973:i:3:p:289-336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Faeth I (2009) Determinants of foreign direct investment—A tale of nine theoretical models. J Econ Surv 23(1):165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression. SAGE, Los Angeles. ISBN: 141297514XGoogle Scholar
  32. Fujita, M, Venables, A, Krugman, PR (1999) The spatial economy. Cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Online verfügbar unter http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=9243.
  33. Giles D (2011) Dummies for dummies. http://davegiles.blogspot.de/2011/03/dummies-for-dummies.html. Accessed Mar 2017
  34. Globerman S, Shapiro DM (1999) The impact of government policies on foreign direct investment: the Canadian experience. J Int Bus Stud 30(3):513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Globerman S, Shapiro D (2002) Global foreign direct investment flows: the role of governance infrastructure. World Dev 30(11):1899–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN: 0-13-110849-2Google Scholar
  37. Harris CD (1954) The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrison MJ, McCabe BPM (1979) A test for heteroscedasticity based on ordinary least squares residuals. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Head K, Mayer T (2004) Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Rev Econ Stat 86(4):959–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holland D, Pain N (1998) The determinants and impact of foreign direct investment in the transitionGoogle Scholar
  42. ILO (2016) ILO database of labour statistics: mean nominal monthly earnings of employees. http://ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/lang--en/index.htm
  43. International Monetary Fund (2016) World Economic Outlook Database. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/index.aspx. Accessed 25 Nov 2016
  44. Iwasaki I, Suganuma K (2009) EU enlargement and foreign direct investment into transition economies revisited. Transl Corp 18(3):27–57Google Scholar
  45. Janssens S, Konings J (1996) How do Western companies respond to the opening of Central and East European economies? Survey evidence from a small open economy-Belgium. Katholieke Universiteit, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  46. Kinoshita Y, Campos N (2003) Why does FDI go where it goes? New Evidence from the transition economies. IMF Working Papers. International Monetary Fund (03/228). http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imf:imfwpa:03/228
  47. Kleibergen F, Paap R (2002) Priors, posteriors and bayes factors for a Bayesian analysis of cointegration. J Econ 111(2):223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kleiber C, Zeileis A (2008) Applied econometrics with R. Springer, New York. ISBN: 978-0-387-77316-2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77318-6
  49. Krkoska L (2001) Foreign direct investment financing of capital formation in Central and Eastern Europe. http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/economics/workingpapers/wp0067.pdf
  50. Lankes H-P, Venables AJ (1996) Foreign direct investment in economic transition: the changing pattern of investments. Econ Transit 4(2):331–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lansbury M, Pain N, Šmídková K (1996) Foreign direct investment in Central Europe since 1990: an econometric study. Natl Inst Econ Rev 156(1)Google Scholar
  52. Meyer K (1998) Direct investment in economies in transition. University, Dissertation – London. Elgar, Cheltenham. ISBN: 978 1 85898 736 1Google Scholar
  53. Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Puga D, Venables AJ (1997) Preferential trading arrangements and industrial location. J Int Econ 43(3–4):347–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Resmini L (2000) The Determinants of foreign direct investment in the CEECs: new evidence from sectoral patterns. Econ Transit 8(3):665–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roland G, Verdier T (2003) Law enforcement and transition. Eur Econ Rev 47(4):669–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rolfe RJ, Woodward DP (2004) Attracting foreign investment through privatization: the Zambian experience. J Afr Bus 5(1):5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Savary J (1997) The French firms motivations for investing in Eastern Europe countries. A study of investors and potential investors. In: Witkowska J, Wysokinska Z, Zofia (eds) Motivations of foreign direct investors and their propensity to exports in the context of European integration process. University of Lódz, Lódz, pp 43–76Google Scholar
  59. Stern N (1997) The transition in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: some strategic lessons from the experience of 25 countries over six yearsGoogle Scholar
  60. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: Identification and inference for econometric models : essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 80–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thursby JG (1982) Misspecification, heteroscedasticity, and the chow and Goldfeld-Quandt tests. Rev Econ Stat 64(2):314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UNCTAD (2003) World investment report: FDI policies for development: national and international perspectives. United Nations, New York. ISBN: 92-1-112580-4Google Scholar
  63. UNCTAD (2004) World investment report: the shift towards services. United Nations, New York. ISBN: 92-1-112644-4Google Scholar
  64. UNCTAD (2016c) UNCTADstat: Foreign direct investment: inward and outward flows and stock, annual, 1970–2015 Table summary. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96740
  65. UNCTAD (2016d) UNCTADstat: Gross domestic product: total and per capita, current and constant (2005) prices, annual, 1970–2015. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96
  66. Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q J Econ 80(2):190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. ISBN: 9780262232586. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=550663Google Scholar
  68. Wooldridge JM (2012) Panel data models with heterogeneity and endogeneity: programme evaluation for policy analysis. https://www.ifs.org.uk/docs/wooldridge%20session%204.pdf
  69. Wooldridge JM (2013) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH. ISBN: 978-1-111-53104-1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna Makhavikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and ManagementOtto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations