Advertisement

Hutchinsonianism, Newtonian Science, and the Question of Evidence in a Fragmenting World

  • Robert L. Knetsch
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 225)

Abstract

The theory of gravity that emerged out of the natural philosophy of Isaac Newton is seen as a significant milestone in the progression of scientific discovery; it was not, however, received with universal acclaim. In England, a particularly influential group emerged that comprised a reaction against the perceived heterodoxy of Newton’s work and its lack of sufficient corroborative evidence. Started by John Hutchinson (1674–1737), these anti-Newtonians perceived within Newton’s system certain challenges to Christian metaphysical claims. The Hutchinsonians’ peculiar claim to cosmological evidence within the “heavenly” language of the Hebrew Bible, along with Newton’s perceived heterodox views, fueled their disdain for Newtonian mechanics. Starting from a consideration of Hutchinson’s Moses’s Principia as a response to Newton, this chapter considers how Hutchinson used a particular interpretive approach to the Bible as the source of evidence for his cosmogony. This chapter takes into account the broader issues that come into play as theologians sought to respond to the various options for evidentiary sources. This was a time when, in England, society at large began to experience a perceived split between science and religion, leading to numerous reactions, rejections, and accommodations.

References

  1. Andrews, Robert M. 2015. Lay Activism and the High Church Movement of the Late Eighteenth Century: The Life and Thought of William Stevens, 1732–1807. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Summa Theologiae. Cambridge: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
  3. Aston, Nigel. 2004. From Personality to Party: The Creation and Transmission of Hutchinsonianism c. 1725–1750. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25: 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. English, John C. 1999. John Hutchinson’s Critique of Newtonian Heterodoxy. Church History 68: 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman, Michael. 2012. Newton and Kant on Absolute Space: From Theology to Transcendental Philosophy. In Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, ed. Andrew Janiak and Eric Schliesser, 342–359. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Friesen, John. 2006. Hutchinsonianism and the Newtonian Enlightenment. Centaurus 48: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henry, John. 1986. Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory. History of Science 24: 335–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutchinson, John. 1748–1749. The Philosophical and Theological Works of John Hutchinson, Esq. Ed. R. Spearman and J. Bates. 12 vols. London: Printed for J. Hodges.Google Scholar
  9. Hutchinson, Keith. 1982. What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution? Isis 73: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Illiffe, Rob. 2017. Priest of Nature: The Religious Worlds of Isaac Newton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Katz, David S. 1990. The Hutchinsonians and Hebraic Fundamentalism in Eighteenth-Century England. In Sceptics, Millenarians, and Jews, ed. David S. Katz and Jonathan I. Israel, 237–255. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1994. ‘Moses’s Principia’: Hutchinsonianism and Newton’s critics. In The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s Time and the British Isles of Newton’s Time, ed. James E. Force and Richard H. Popkin, 201–211. Dortrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2004. God’s Last Words. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Knetsch, Robert L. 2014. A Darkened Reading: A Reception History of the Book of Isaiah in a Divided Church. Eugene: Pickwick.Google Scholar
  15. Koberlein, Brian. How We Know Gravity Is Not (Just) a Force. Universe Today, January 30, 2014. http://www.universetoday.com/108740/how-we-know-gravity-is-not-just-a-force/. Accessed 2 Sept 2015.
  16. Leighton, Cadoc D. A. 2000. ‘Knowledge of Divine Things’: A Study of Hutchinsonianism. History of European Ideas 26: 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levine, J. M. 2004. Woodward, John (1665/1668–1728). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, ed. Lawrence Goldman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxforddnb.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/view/article/29946. Accessed 14 May 2016.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, Rhodri. 2012. Language, Mind and Nature: Artificial Languages in England from Bacon to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nockles, Peter B. 1994. The Oxford Movement in Context: Anglican High Churchmanship 1760–1857. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sachs, William L. 1993. The Transformation of Anglicanism: From State Church to Global Communioni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Snobelin, Stephen D. 2015. The Unknown Newton: Cosmos and Apocalypse. The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society 44: 76–94.Google Scholar
  22. Spearman, Robert. 1776. A Supplement to the Works of John Hutchinson, Esq; Being an Index and Explanation of all the Hebrew Words Cited in the Second Part of his Moses’s Principia. With Additional Remarks, By the Late Learned Robert Spearman, Esq. London: W. Faden.Google Scholar
  23. Sprenger, Florian. 2015. Insensible and Inexplicable – On the Two Meanings of Occult. Communication +1 4: 1–24.Google Scholar
  24. Tarbuc, Derya Gurses. 2011. John Wesley’s Critical Engagement with Hutchinsonianism 1730–1780. History of European Ideas 37: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner, James. 2014. Philology: The Forgotten Origin of the Modern Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Varley, Elizabeth A. 1992. The Last of the Prince Bishops: William Van Mildert and the High Church Movement of the Early Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilde, C. B. 1980. Hutchinsonianism, Natural Philosophy, and Religious Controversy in Eighteenth Century Britain. History of Science 18: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 1982. Matter and Spirit as Natural Symbols in Eighteenth-Century British Natural Philosophy. The British Journal for the History of Science 15: 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Knetsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Wycliffe CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations