A System of Indicators for Evaluating Public Broadcasting Corporations

  • Olga Blasco-BlascoEmail author
  • Pedro J. Pérez
  • Luis E. Vila
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 154)


We describe an operational procedure to build an integrated information system (IIS) for monitoring and evaluating the performance of public broadcasting corporations (PBC). The procedure grounds in a conceptual framework derived from evaluation models, and consists of two stages. The first stage is the selection, through expert judgment, of simple indicators that illustrate the most relevant aspects of the corporations. The second stage is the definition of a system of indicators related to each level of the hierarchy of objectives planned by the corporations. The system of indicators has two levels. The first level is a basic indicator system that allows description and monitoring of the reality of the activities of a corporation on a daily basis. The second level consists of a strategic indicator system, which expresses the consequences that the activities of a PBC generate in its environment, both as short-term effects and as medium and long-term impacts.


Information system Indicators Evaluation Public broadcasting corporations 


  1. Bakewell, O., Garbutt, A.: The use and abuse of the logical framework approach INTRAC technical report, SIDA (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Carrasco, S. (coord.): Cómo evaluar proyectos de cultura para el desarrollo: una aproximación metodológica a la construcción de indicadores. AECID, Madrid (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Coll-Serrano, V., Carrasco-Arroyo, S., Blasco-Blasco, O., Vila-Lladosa, L.: Design of a basic system of indicators for monitoring and evaluating spanish cooperation’s culture and development strategy. Eval. Rev. 36, 272–302 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coll-Serrano, V., Blasco-Blasco, O., Carrasco-Arroyo, S., Vila-Lladosa, L.: Un sistema de indicadores para el seguimiento y evaluación de la gestión sostenible del patrimonio cultural. Transinformaçao 25, 55–63 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalkey, N., Brown B., Cochran S.: The Delphi method III: Use of self rating to improve group estimates. Research Memorandum, RM-6115-PR, CA: The Rand Corporation (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Dalkey, N.C., Helmer, O.: An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage. Sci. 9, 458–467 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon, T. J.: The Delphi method. AC/UNU Millennium Project, (1994)
  8. Hallowell, M.R., Gambatese, J.A.: Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136, 99–107 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammond, A. L., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., Woodward, D.: Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resources Institute (1995)Google Scholar
  10. Hanafin, S., Brooks, A.-M., Carroll, E., Fitzgerald, E., Gabhainn, S.N., Sixsmith, J.: Achieving consensus in developing a national set of child well-being indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 80, 79–104 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasselbring, W.: Information system integration. Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 43, 32–38 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Joint Research Centre-European Commission: Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and User guide. OECD (2008)Google Scholar
  13. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42, 361–371 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landeta, J.: El Método Delphi. Una Técnica de Previsión Para la Incertidumbre. Ariel, Barcelona (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Landeta, J.: Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 73, 467–482 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Linstone, H. A., Turoff, M.: The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Loo, R.: The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: Int. J. Police Strat. and Manag. 25, 762–769 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf. Manag. 42, 15–29 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saisana, M., Tarantola, S.: State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Commission, EUR 20408 EN, Joint Research Centre (2002)Google Scholar
  20. Sartorius, R.H.: The logical framework approach to project design and management. Am. J. Eval. 12, 139–147 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stufflebeam, D., Shinkfield, A.: Evaluación Sistemática: Guía Teórica y Práctica. Paidós Ibérica, Barcelona (2002)Google Scholar
  22. Wilhelm, W.J.: Alchemy of the oracle: The Delphi technique. Delta Pi Epsilon J. 43, 6–26 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. Worthen, B.R., Sanders, J.R.: Educational Evaluation. Longman, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  24. Zolingen, S.J., Klaasen, C.A.: Selection process in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 70, 317–340 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Blasco-Blasco
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pedro J. Pérez
    • 1
  • Luis E. Vila
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations