Advertisement

Deep Extrusive Landslides; Peculiarities of Formation, Development, and Protection

Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Discovery in Russian Science and Engineering book series (IDRSE)

Abstract

The current study summarizes a vast body of knowledge encompassing an inventory of landslide cases, overview of mechanisms of landslide development, and slope stability assessments.

A new mechanism-based landslide classification is presented and discussed. The mechanism of formation of the limiting state in a soil mass during the preparation of the landslide is considered. The equations for assessment of a soil mass limited state prior landslide formation were obtained. Also the equation for calculation of a landslide slip surface depth was obtained, using slope morphological and soil strength parameters.

The article also contains scientific explanation of effective reinforcement of territories with deep block-type landslides. The suggested protection strategy bases on theoretical solutions of preparing of a destructive phase of landslide deformations, on taking into account mechanism peculiarities of deep block-type landslides, and also on investigation experience of such landslides in different engineering-geological conditions.

Keywords

Landslide mechanisms Landslide classifications Calculation of a slip surface depth Reinforcement measures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by Russian Scientific Foundation (Project № 16-17-00125).

References

  1. 1.
    Abelev, M. Y. (1983). Building of industrial and civil constructions on weak saturated soils. Moscow: Stroyizdat.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashpiz, E. S. (2002). Monitoring of road beds during the exploitation of railroads (p. 112). Moscow: Put’-Press (in Russian).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cruden, D. M., & Varnes, D. J. (1996). Landslide types and processes. In A. K. Turner & R. L. Schuster (Eds.), Landslides investigation and mitigation: Transportation research board (pp. 36–75). Washington, DC: US National Research Council., Special Report 247.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dalmatov, B. I. (1988). Soil mechanics, bases and foundations (including special course of engineering geology). Moscow: Stroyizdat 415 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demin, A. M. (1981). Regularities of manifestations of deformations of slopes in open pits. Moscow: Nauka 144 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demin, A. M. (2009). Landslides in quarries: Analysis and forecast. Moscow: GEOS 79 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emelyanova, E. P. (1956). Methodological guidance on stationary study of landslides. Moscow: Gosgeoltehizdat 256 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emelyanova, E. P. (1972). Main regularities of landslide process. Moscow: Nedra 310 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fisenko, G. L. (1965). Stability of pit sides and blades. Moscow: Nedra 378 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    General reports of the VIII International Congress on soil mechanics and Foundation engineering. (1975). Translation from English. Moscow: Stroyizdat 190 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ginzburg, L. K. (1986). Recommendations on the choice of methods of calculation of stability factor and landslide pressure. Central Bureau of sci.-tech. Moscow: Inform (in Russian).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldstein, M. N., Turovskaya, A. Y., & Babitskaya, S. S. (1969). About the strength of water-saturated plastic clays (pp. 5–12). Proceedings of the VII International Congress on soil mechanics and Foundation engineering. Stroyizdat, Moscow. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldstein, M. N. (1979). Mechanical properties of soils (stress-strain and strength characteristics). Moscow: Stroyizdat 304 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gulakyan, K. A., Kuntsel, V. V., & Postoev, G. P. (1970). The mechanism and dynamics of the landslide process on the example of landslide in Zerafshan valley. In Materials of sci.-tech. meeting on methods of study and forecast of debris flows, rockfalls and landslides (pp. 59–65). Dushanbe. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gulakyan, K. A., Kuntsel, V. V., & Postoev, G. P. (1977). Forecasting of landslide processes. Moscow: Nedra 135 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kazeev, A. I., Lapochkin, B. K., & Postoev, G. P. (2009). Peculiarities of computer modelling of stability of landslide slopes by the program AKNARK. In Proceedings of the conference «Sergeev’s readings» (pp. 296–300), Moscow. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kostomarov, V. M. (1964). Designing of landslide protection structures. In Proceedings of the conference on the study of landslides and protective (pp. 44–53). Kiev. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuntsel, V. V. (1980). Regularities of the landslide process in the European part of the USSR and its regional forecast. Moscow: Nedra 213 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landslides and mudflows. (1984). Under the editorship of E.A. Kozlovskiy (Vol. 1). Moscow: Centre Int. Projects GKNT 352 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lomtadze, V. D. (1977). Engineering geology. Engineering geodynamics. Leningrad: Nedra 475 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malyshev, M. V. (1980). Soil strength and stability of foundations of structures. Moscow: Stroyizdat 136 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maslov, N. N. (1977). Soil mechanics in construction practice (landslides and their control). Moscow: Stroyizdat 318 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsiy, S. I., & Bezuglova, E. V. (2010). Management of landslide risk. Krasnodar: Alvi design 240 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheko, A. I., & Grechischev, S. E. (Eds.). (1988). Methodology of studying and forecasting of exogenous geological processes. Moscow: Nedra 216 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Naumenko, P. N. (1977). Conditions of formation and geotechnical characteristics of landslides on the Black sea along the coast of Odessa. Landslides on the Black sea coast of Ukraine (pp. 57–100). Moscow: Nedra (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Niyazov, R. A. (1974). Landslides in the loess rocks of the South-Eastern part of Central Asia. Tashkent: Fan 148 p.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Osipov, V. I. (1988). Dynamic liquefaction of saturated soils: Nature and determine factors (scientific review). Engineering Geology, 2, 3–31. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osipov, V. I., Kutepov, V. M., Zverev, V. P., et al. (1999). Dangerous exogenous processes. Under the editorship of V.I. Osipov. Moscow: GEOS 290 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Osipov, V. I., Postoev, G. P., & Kazeev, A. I. (2015). Justification of the choice of criteria for landslide hazard in the system of automated monitoring of the landslide process on the coastal slopes of the river Mzymta. Geoecology, 2, 133–146 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Petrov, N. F. (1987). Landslide system. Simple landslides (aspects of classification). Kishinev: Shtiintsa 164 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pevzner, M. E. (1992). Deformation of rocks in quarries. Moscow: Nedra 335 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Postoev, G. P., Erysh, I. F., Kruglov, A. V., et al. (1982). Studying of the regime of landslide processes. Moscow: Nedra 255p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Postoev, G. P., Erysh, I. F., Salomatin, V. N., et al. (1989). Artificial activation of landslides. Moscow: Nedra 134 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Postoev, G. P. (2010). Main characteristics and features of landslides. Geoecology, 2, 140–148 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Postoev, G. P. (2013). Limit state and deformation of soils in the mass (landslides, karst holes, settlings of ground foundations). Moscow: Nestor-istoriya 100 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Postoev, G. P., Lapochkin, B. K., & Kazeev, A. I. (2015). The assessment of the extent of a landslide hazard by forcing the activization of a landslide and conducting of inclinometric monitoring. Engineering Protection, 1(Special issue), 128–135. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Postoev, G. P., & Kazeev, A. I. (2011). Method of determining in a landslide prone mass of potentially deformed horizon depth. Patent RF № 2412305. 20.02.2011. Bull. №5. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shadunts, K. S. (1983). Landslides-flows. Moscow: Nedra 120 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shahunyants, G. M. (1953). The roadbed of railways. Moscow: Transzheldorizdat 827 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ter-Martirosyan, Z. G. (1986). Prediction of mechanical processes in masses of multi-phase soils. Moscow: Nedra 292 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ter-Stepanyan, G. I. (1978). New methods of landslide investigations. Yerevan: Publishing House of AAS 152 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tihvinsky, I. O. (1988). Evaluation and prediction of stability of landslide slopes. Moscow: Nauka 144 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsytovich, N. A., & Ter-Martirosyan, Z. G. (1981). Fundamentals of applied geomechanics in building. Moscow: Higher School 317 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Turovskaya, A. Y. (1979). Regularities of development of landslide processes depending on strength and deformation characteristics of clayey soils. Abstract of Dissertation. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University. (p. 39) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vyalov, S. S. (1978). Rheological bases of soil mechanics. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola 447 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhihovich, B. V. (2007). About the presence of extrusion of landslide slopes of Odessa coast. The Bases, Foundations and Soil Mechanics, 5, 7–11 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zolotarev, G. S. (1983). Engineering geodynamics. Moscow: Publishing House of MSU 328 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience of Russian Academy of Sciences (IEG RAS)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations