Advertisement

The New Method of the Potentially Hazardous Geodynamic Active Zone Mapping

  • Ekaterina Karfidova
  • Vladimir Makeev
Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Discovery in Russian Science and Engineering book series (IDRSE)

Abstract

Authors developed GIS methods to detect the azimuthal disagreements of zones at surfaces of different ages of key horizons for the mapping of the subhorizontal geodynamic active zones at the platforms. The method is based on the analysis of digital elevation models to detect areas of an azimuthal and angle falling disagreement zones. Graphics of these zones indicate a heterogeneous structure of the key horizons, which is the reason for the development of subhorizontal geodynamic active zones. It is assumed that the greater the disagreement different age deformation, the higher the probability of the development of these zones which are hazardous to intensify geological processes.

References

  1. 1.
    Makarov, V. I., Dorozhko, A. L., Makarova, N. V., & Makeev, V. M. (2007). Geodynamic active zones of platforms. Geoecology. Engineering geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology, (2), 99–110 (on the Russian).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makarov, V. I., Grigorieva, S. V., Makeev, V. M., Korobova, I. V., & Krylova, V. S. (2013). Structural-geodynamic map of Moscow, scale 1:25 000. Small encyclopedic atlas of Moscow. M. (on the Russian).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makeev, V. M., Makarova, N. V., Ledenev, V. N., Dorozhko, A. L., Sukhanova, N. V., Karfidova, E. A., & Korobova, I. V. (2014). Fundamentals of geodynamic safety concept areas of environmentally hazardous facilities. Geoecology, (2), 99–110 (on the Russian).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Makeev, V. M., Karfidova, E. A., Miklyaev, P. S., Avkhimovich, A. N., Dorozhko, A. L., & Korobova, A., IV. (2013). Method for studying layered structural disagreements in geodynamic studies. Proceedings of the VII University Geological Readings: Problems of regional geology and mineral exploration (pp. 20–22). Minsk: BSU Publishing Center (on the Russian).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Makarov, V. I., Grigorieva, S. V., & Makeev, V. M. (2011). Structural and geodynamic researches in engineering geology surveys and environment study. Environmental Geosciences and Engineering Survey for Territory Protection and Population Safety. International Conference under the aegis of IAEG. EngeoPro. Moscow. Abstracts to Proceeding/Moscow/ 06-08/09/2011(on the Russian).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mironov, O. K. (2011). GIS technology to produce the large-scale geological mapping the territory of Moscow. Environmental Geoscience. Engineering Geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology, (3), Moscow, 200–216 (on the Russian).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karfidova, E. A., & Sizov, A. P. (2008). Evaluation study of the conditions of the urban area for engineering and geological mapping. Use and protection of natural resources NIA-NATURE, (1). Moscow, pp. 65–72 (on the Russian).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Makeev, V. M., Karfidova, E. A., & Dorozhko, A. L. (2014). Structural-geodynamic mapping including the geostatistical analysis methods of the platform areas on the example of Moscow Megalopolis. Torino: Springer, IAEG XII Congress.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ekaterina Karfidova
    • 1
  • Vladimir Makeev
    • 1
  1. 1.IEG RASMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations