Geodynamic Stability of Territories with Specially Important Engineering Objects

  • Natalia Makarova
  • Vladimir Makeev
  • Tatyana Sukhanova
  • Irina Korobova
Part of the Innovation and Discovery in Russian Science and Engineering book series (IDRSE)


The presented research most fully characterizes the geological structure of the territories chosen for construction of important engineering facilities. The research consists of three blocks. The structural and compositional block characterizes a structure of the basement and the sedimentary cover, structural unconformities, and faults, which can be activated in new geodynamic conditions. The structural-geomorphological (neotectonic) block is aimed at defining the type, amplitudes, and development rates of the newest regional and local structures. The structural and geodynamic block includes the definition of geodynamic conditions and trends of the modern development of structures that could cause negative processes. The concept of geodynamic safety of the territories with environmentally hazardous objects, based on this research, has been developed.


Geodynamics Territory stability Atomic stations Engineering objects 


  1. 1.
    Lomtadze, V. D. (1999). Dictionary of engineering geology. SPb.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deep structure and geodynamic processes in the lithosphere of the East European platform (2003). Ekaterinburg: UrO RAS, 299 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makeev, V. M., Karfidova, E. A., Miklyaev, P. S., Avkhimovich, A. N., & Dorozhko, A. L. (2013). A method for studying the azimuthal disagreement of the different-age and sub-deep horizons of the sedimentary cover under geodynamic studies // Problems in the Region. geology and sex exploration. anthropology. Materials of the VII University Geological. readings. Minsk. Ed. Center of BSU, P. 18–20.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kostenko, N. P., Makarova, N. V., & Korchuganova, N. I. (1999). Expression in the relief of folded and discontinuous deformations. Structural-geomorphological interpretation of aerial photographs, space images and topographic maps: Textbook. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University 120 p.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kopp, M. L. (2004). Mobilistic neotectonics platforms of South-Eastern Europe. Moscow: Nauka 340 p. (Tr. GIN RAS, issue 552).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Makarov, V. I., Dorozhko, A. L., Makarova, N. V., & Makeev, V. M. (2007). Geodynamically active zones of platforms. Geoecology.(2), 990–110. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Makarova, N. V., Makeev, V. M., Dorozhko, A. L., Sukhanova, T. V., & Korobova, I. V. (2016. 91). Geodynamic systems and geodynamically active zones of the east European platform. Bulletin Moscow of the Testers of Nature Otdel Geology, 4–5, 9–26. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopp, M. L. (2011). Imposition of differently oriented Cenozoic stresses in the center of the Russian plate. Modern. Problems of geodynamics and geoecology of intraplate orogens. Materials V intern. Simpos (Vol. T.2, pp. 37–41). Bishkek: Scientific. Station of the Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Makarova, N. V., Makeev, V. M., Sukhanova T. V., & Miklyaev P. S., et al. (2012). The newest tectonics and geodynamics of the Nizhnekoksky district, Vestn. Moscow. un-ta. Ser. 4. Geology. № 4.. 3–11. Vestn. Moscow. un-ta. Ser. 4. Geology. 2012. № 4. P. 3–11.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makarova, N. V., Makeev, V. M., Sukhanova, T. V., Dorozhko, A. L., & Korobova, I. V. (2015). The newest tectonics and geodynamics of the southwestern wing of the Voronezh anteclise // Vestn. Moscow. un-ta. Ser. 4. Geology. . № 1. P. 10–19.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Makeev, V. M., Makarova, N. V., Ledenev, V. N., Dorozhko, A. L., Sukhanova, T. V., Karfidova, E. A., & Korobova, I. V. (2015). Bases of the concept of geodynamic safety of ecologically dangerous constructions. Geoecology. (2), 99–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Makarova
    • 1
  • Vladimir Makeev
    • 2
  • Tatyana Sukhanova
    • 1
  • Irina Korobova
    • 2
  1. 1.Moscow State University (MSU), Geological FacultyMoscowRussia
  2. 2.IEG RASMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations