Advertisement

Smart Systems in Emergency Wayfinding: A Literature Review

  • Elisângela Vilar
  • Francisco Rebelo
  • Paulo Noriega
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10919)

Abstract

Wayfinding difficulties may lead people to avoid places; it also can make them late for important occurrences such as business meetings or flights, which may cause loss of opportunity and money. Additionally, as settings grow in dimension and complexity, emergency evacuation emerges as a key problem, and wayfinding becomes a matter of life and death. Thus, a large concentration of people, with different degrees of familiarity with the building, motivations, and anxieties, should be able to satisfy their needs in a network of paths leading to different destinations, even when, during an emergency, they face doubtful situations created by the incongruence between the architecture and the signage system. In this context, the present paper is focused on a theoretical review on emergency evacuation process and signage systems in order to explore new paradigms on emergency wayfinding into complex building. Considering the evolution of technology in terms of availability, cost and ease of use, this paper discusses the use of traditional and new wayfinding system considering some established theories such as the “cry wolf” and the “learned irrelevance” theories.

Keywords

Smart systems Smart buildings Wayfinding Emergency evacuation Signage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by FCT grant n. SFRH/BPD/93993/2013.

References

  1. Abdelgawad, H., Abdulhai, B.: Emergency evacuation planning as a network design problem: a critical review. Transp. Lett. Int. J. Transp. Res. 1, 41–58 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2009.01.01.41-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, A., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Vilar, E., Borges, T.: Virtual environment evaluation for a safety warning effectiveness study. Procedia Manuf. 3, 5971–5978 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, A.G.: Learned irrelevance and learned helplessness: rats learn that stimuli, reinforcers, and responses are uncorrelated. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 2, 130–141 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardini, G.: Fire safety and building heritage: the occupants perspective. Fire Safety of Historical Buildings. SAST, pp. 7–43. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55744-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardini, G., Azzolini, M., D’Orazio, M., Quagliarini, E.: Intelligent evacuation guidance systems for improving fire safety of Italian-style historical theatres without altering their architectural characteristics. J. Cult. Herit. 22, 1006–1018 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breznitz, S.: Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms - S. Breznitz - Google Livros. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey (1984). https://books.google.pt/books?hl=pt-PT&lr=&id=lxwLVy16wqoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&dq=cry+wolf+Theory&ots=BIvM4NcC5M&sig=D6V175lXGqVrtncQ9Djp1nBpZog&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=crywolfTheory&f=false
  7. CFPA-E Guideline no 19:2009 F.: Fire safety engineering concerning evacuation from buildings. CFPA Europe, Zurich (2009). http://www.cfpa-e.eu/wp-content/uploads/files/guidelines/CFPA_E_Guideline_No_19_2009.pdf
  8. Conroy, R.: Spatial Navigation in Immersive Virtual Environments. Faculty of Built Environment (Vol. Doctor). University of London, London (2001)Google Scholar
  9. D’Orazio, M., Bernardini, G., Tacconi, S., Arteconi, V., Quagliarini, E.: Fire safety in Italian-style historical theatres: How photoluminescent wayfinding can improve occupants’ evacuation with no architecture modifications. J. Cult. Herit. 19, 492–501 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2015.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duarte, E.: Using Virtual Reality to Assess Behavioral Compliance with Warnings. Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon (2010)Google Scholar
  11. Duarte, E., Rebelo, F., Teles, J., Wogalter, M.: Behavioral compliance in virtual reality : effects of warning type. In: Kaber, D.B., Boy, G. (eds.) Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 812–821. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Ltd., Boca Raton, Florida (2010) http://www.safetyhumanfactors.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/312DuarteRebeloTelesWogalter2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
  12. Duarte, E., Rebelo, F., Teles, J., Wogalter, M.S.: Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment. Appl. Ergon. 45(5), 1367–1375 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamberini, L., Chittaro, L., Spagnolli, A., Carlesso, C.: Psychological response to an emergency in virtual reality: effects of victim ethnicity and emergency type on helping behavior and navigation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 104–113 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gamberini, L., Cottone, P., Spagnolli, A., Varotto, D., Mantovani, G.: Responding to a fire emergency in a virtual environment: different patterns of action for different situations. Ergonomics 46(8), 842–858 (2003). http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/0014013031000111266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorbil, G., Gelenbe, E.: Opportunistic communications for emergency support systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 5, 39–47 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibrahim, A.M., Venkat, I., Subramanian, K.G., Khader, A.T., De Wilde, P.: Intelligent evacuation management systems. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 7(3), 1–27 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2842630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ISO: ISO 3864-1 graphical symbols — safety colours and safety signs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130(4), 2525 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3655080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kobes, M., Helsloot, I., de Vries, B., Post, J.: Exit choice, (pre-)movement time and (pre-)evacuation behaviour in hotel fire evacuation — behavioural analysis and validation of the use of serious gaming in experimental research. Procedia Eng. 3, 37–51 (2010a).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2010.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kobes, M., Helsloot, I., de Vries, B., Post, J.G.: Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Saf. J. 45(1), 1–11 (2010b).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lijding, M.E.M., Meratnia, N., Benz, H.P., Matysiak Szóstek, A.: Smart Signs Show You the Way. I/O Vivat, 22(LNCS4549/4), 35–38 (2007). https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/6873918
  21. Mantovani, G., Gamberini, L., Martinelli, M., Varotto, D.: Exploring the suitability of virtual environments for safety training: signals, norms and ambiguity in a simulated emergency escape. Cogn. Technol. Work 3(1), 33–41 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00011519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayhorn, C.B., Wogalter, M.S.: Technology-based warnings: improvising safety through increased cognitive support to users. In: 15th International Ergonomics Association Congress, pp. 504–507 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. McClintock, T., Shields, T.J., Reinhardt-Rutland, A.H., Leslie, J.C.: A behavioural solution to the learned irrelevance of emergency exit signage. In: 2nd International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire, Boston, MA, pp. 23–33 (2001)Google Scholar
  24. Nilsson, D.: Exit choice in fire emergencies : influencing choice of exit with flashing lights. Dept. of Fire Safety Engineering and Systems Safety, Lund University (2009)Google Scholar
  25. O’Connor, D.J.: Integrating human behaviour factors into design. Fire Prot. Eng., pp. 8–20 (2005). https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.sfpe.org/resource/resmgr/FPE_Magazine_Archives/2000-2009/2005_Q4.pdf
  26. Purser, D., Bensilum, M.: Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations. Saf. Sci. 38(2), 157–182 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00066-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Santos, G., Aguirre, B.E.: A critical review of emergency evacuation simulation models NIST workshop on building occupant movement during fire emergencies. In: NIST Workshop on Building Occupant Movement during Fire Emergencies, pp. 25–50 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. Shih, N.-J., Lin, C.-Y., Yang, C.-H.: A virtual-reality-based feasibility study of evacuation time compared to the traditional calculation method. Fire Saf. J. 34(4), 377–391 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00009-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith-Jackson, T.L., Wogalter, M.S.: Potential uses of technology to communicate risk in manufacturing. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 14(1), 1–14 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.v14:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang, C.-H., Wu, W.-T., Lin, C.-Y.: Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. Appl. Ergon. 40(4), 722–730 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vilar, E.: Using Virtual Reality to Study the Influence of Environmental Variables to Enhance Wayfinding within Complex Buildings. University of Lisbon (2012)Google Scholar
  32. Vilar, E., Duarte, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Vilar, E.: A pilot study using virtual reality to investigate the effects of emergency egress signs competing with environmental variables on route choices. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8519, pp. 369–377. Springer, Cham (2014a).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5_36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P.: Indoor human wayfinding performance using vertical and horizontal signage in virtual reality. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Service Ind. 24(6), 601–615 (2014b).  https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Duarte, E., Mayhorn, C.B.: Effects of competing environmental variables and signage on route-choices in simulated everyday and emergency wayfinding situations. Ergonomics 57(4), 511–524 (2014c).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Teles, J., Mayhorn, C.: The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Appl. Ergon. 44(4), 618–627 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: Applied Attention Theory. CRC Press (2008). https://www.crcpress.com/Applied-Attention-Theory/Wickens-McCarley/p/book/9780805859836
  37. Wogalter, M.S.: Thnology will revolutionize warnings. In: Proceedings of the Solutions in Safety through Technology Symposium. American Society of Safety Engineers, Scottsdale (2006). http://www.safetyhumanfactors.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/294-Wogalter-2006.pdf
  38. Wogalter, M.S., Conzola, V.C.: Using technology to facilitate the design and delivery of warnings. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 33(6), 461–466 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720210133651CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Wogalter, M.S., Mayhorn, C.B.: Providing cognitive support with technology-based warning systems. Ergonomics 48(5), 522–533 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wogalter, M.S., Mayhorn, C.B.: The future of risk communication: technology-based warning systems. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of warnings, pp. 783–794. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (2006)Google Scholar
  41. Xie, H., Filippidis, L., Galea, E.R., Blackshields, D., Lawrence, P.J.: Experimental analysis of the effectiveness of emergency signage and its implementation in evacuation simulation. Fire Mater. 36(5–6), 367–382 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisângela Vilar
    • 1
  • Francisco Rebelo
    • 1
  • Paulo Noriega
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de Arquitetura, Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design, Rua Sá NogueiraUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations