Advertisement

Design Theory and Methodology in HCI: Applying CPM/PDD to UCD

  • Jan Conrad
  • Christian Koehler
  • Dieter Wallach
  • Tobias Luedeke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10918)

Abstract

The development of human computer interfaces is a complex, multifaceted process with many soft influencing factors and boundary conditions. In addition to other approaches, the user-centered design has proved to be a meaningful and suitable model to support the development of interactive systems. Also, in design theory and methodology, a research field that investigates similar processes for the area of mechanical engineering, a large number of models have been investigated. This paper applies the Characteristics-Properties Modelling/Property-Driven Development (CPM/PDD) to User Centered Design (UCD). It explores the mapping of the two models to obtain support and insights for the selection of techniques and metrics for the development of interactive systems. For this purpose, this paper first describes CPM/PDD and discusses why it is particularly suitable for the considerations made here. After a short description of the UCD, the paper explores touch points and maps the two models to each other. A small case study shows the possible application and offers a starting point for further research.

Keywords

User centered design CPM/PDD Design theory HCI AI 

References

  1. 1.
    ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 210: Human-centred design process for interactive systems. ISO, Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steimle, T., Wallach, D.: Collaborative UX Design. dpunkt.verlag, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deborah, J.M.: The usability engineering lifecycle. In: CHI 1999 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 147–148. ACM, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weber, C.: Modelling products and product development based on characteristics and properties. In: Chakrabarti, A., Blessing, L.T.M. (eds.) An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, pp. 327–352. Springer, London (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber, C.: CPM/PDD—an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli symposium. Fraunhofer-IRB-Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 159–179 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suh, N.P.: The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gero, J.S.: Design prototypes—a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag. 11(4), 26–36 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    VDI-Guideline 2221: Systematic approach to the design of technical systems and products. VDI, Düsseldorf, 1987. English version of VDI-Guideline 2221 (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2. (1st edn. 1983, 3rd edn. 2007; all English editions translated and edited by Wallace, K., Blessing LTM) (1983/2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weber, C.: Produkte und Produktentwicklungsprozesse abbilden mit Hilfe von Merkmalen und Eigenschaften – eine kritische Zwischenbilanz (Keynote-Beitrag). 23. DfX-Symposium, Bamberg, 04.–05.10.2012. In: Krause, D., Paetzold, K., Wartzack, S. (eds.) Design for X – Beiträge zum 23. DfX-Symposium Oktober 2012. TuTech Innovation GmbH, Hamburg, 2012, pp. 25–62 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deubel, T.: Anforderungs-, kosten- und wertgetriebene Steuerung des Produktentwicklungsprozesses. Dissertation Universität des Saarlandes, Schriftenreihe Produktionstechnik Bd. 39, Saarbruecken (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Köhler, C.: Technische Produktänderung – Analyse und Beurteilung von Lösungsmöglichkeiten auf der Basis einer Erweiterung des CPM/PDD Ansatzes. Dissertation Universität des Saarlandes. Schriftenreihe Produktionstechnik Bd. 45, Saarbruecken (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conrad, J.: Semantische Netze zur Erfassung und Verarbeitung von Informationen und Wissen in der Produktentwicklung. Dissertation Universität des Saarlandes, Schriftenreihe Produktionstechnik Bd. 49, Saarbruecken (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Conrad, J., Köhler, C., Wanke, S., Weber, C.: What is design knowledge from the viewpoint of CPM/PDD? In: Proceedings of DESIGN 2008, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, vol. 2, pp. 745–752 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Notes on User Centered Design Process (UCD). https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/ucd. Accessed 02 Apr 2018
  16. 16.
    CPUX-F – Curriculum and Glossary. http://uxqb.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/CPUX-F_EN_Curriculum-and-Glossary.pdf. Accessed 02 Apr 2018
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Wallach, D., Conrad, J., Steimle, T.: The UX metrics table: a missing artifact. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2017. LNCS, vol. 10288, pp. 507–517. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58634-2_37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Conrad
    • 1
  • Christian Koehler
    • 2
  • Dieter Wallach
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tobias Luedeke
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.htw saar Saarland University of Applied SciencesSaarbrückenGermany
  3. 3.Ergosign GmbHSaarbrückenGermany
  4. 4.csi entwicklungstechnik GmbHNeckarsulmGermany

Personalised recommendations