Advertisement

Experience Categories in Specific Contexts – Creating Positive Experiences in Smart Kitchens

  • Katharina M. Zeiner
  • Julian Henschel
  • Katharina Schippert
  • Kristin Haasler
  • Magdalena Laib
  • Michael Burmester
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10918)

Abstract

Experience categories are a methodology designed to understand existing and create new positive experiences. They describe aspects of positive experiences within a given context, for example work. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it is intended as a proof-of-concept – we show that experience categories can be applied to new contexts. Second, we describe a design process that focuses on the use of experience categories. Here we explore present positive experiences in kitchens, and how smart kitchens can help us to create and support these. Using Experience Interviews, participants described 94 positive experiences they had around kitchen activities. The analysis yielded 17 experience categories for cooking related activities. Based on these categories, we generated concepts to facilitate new positive experiences in the kitchen before, during, and after cooking. We describe this process as well as five concepts including the generation of rituals, trying new things, and supporting each other.

Keywords

User experience Cooking Experience categories 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants who described their experiences. This study was conducted as part of the project SmartKitchen which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Grant Number: 03FH011PX5.

References

  1. 1.
    Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11–15 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seligman, M., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Positive psychology: an introduction. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 5–14 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lyubomirsky, S.: The How of Happiness: A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want. Penguin, London (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seligman, M.: Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. Free Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desmet, P.M.A., Pohlmeyer, A.E., Forlizzi, J.: Special issue editorial: design for subjective well-being. Int. J. Des. 7(3), 5–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvo, R.A., Peters, D.: Positive Computing - Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeiner, K.M., Laib, M., Schippert, K., Burmester, M.: Das Erlebnisinterview – Methode zum Verständnis positiver Erlebnisse. In: Tagungsband der Mensch und Computer 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeiner, K.M., Laib, M., Schippert, K., Burmester, M.: Identifying experience categories to design for positive experiences with technology at work. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference, pp. 3013–3020 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hassenzahl, M., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Laschke, M., Lenz, E., Kim, J.: Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness understanding experiences. Int. J. Des. 7(3), 21–31 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychol. Bull. 51(4), 327–358 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Göritz, A.: Needs, affect, and interactive products – facets of user experience. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 353–362 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tuch, A.N., Trusell, R.N., Hornbæk, K.: Analyzing users’ narratives to understand experience with interactive products. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013, pp. 2079–2088 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B.B.: The Motivation to Work. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuch, A.N., van Schaik, P., Hornbæk, K.: Leisure and work, good and bad: the role of activity domain and valence in modeling user experience. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 23(6), 35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeiner, K.M., Burmester, M., Haasler, K., Henschel, J., Laib, M., Schippert, K.: Designing for positive user experience in work contexts – experience categories and their applications. Hum. Technol. (Accepted for Publication)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turrow, E.: A Taste of Generation Yum: How the Millennial Generation’s Love for Organic Fare, Celebrity Chefs and Microbrews Will Make or Break the Future of Food. Pronoun, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brush, A.J.B., Lee, B., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, S., Saroiu, S., Dixon, C.: Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2115–2124 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davidoff, S., Lee, M.K., Yiu, C., Zimmerman, J., Dey, A.K.: Principles of smart home control. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 19–34 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mennicken, S., Vermeulen, J., Huang, E.M.: From today’s augmented houses to tomorrow’s smart homes: new directions for home automation research. In: Proceedings of 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 105–115 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chuang, Y., Chen, L.-L., Lee, Y.-H.: Envisioning a smart home that can learn and negotiate the needs of multiple users. In: UbiComp/ISWC 2015 Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 237–240 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solaimani, S., Keijzer-Broers, W., Bouwman, H.: What we do - and don’t - know about the smart home: an analysis of the smart home literature. Indoor Built Environ. 24(3), 370–383 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Koskela, T.: Evolution towards smart home environments: empirical evaluation of three user interfaces. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 8(3–4), 234–240 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bell, G., Kaye, J.: Designing technology for domestic spaces: a kitchen manifesto. Gastron. J. Crit. Food Stud. 2(2), 46–62 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grimes, A., Harper, R.: Celebratory technology. In: Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, p. 467 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hashimoto, A., Mori, N., Funatomi, T., Yamakata, Y., Kakusho, K., Minoh, M.: Smart kitchen: a user centric cooking support system. In: Proceedings of the IPMU, pp. 848–854 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sato, A., Watanabe, K., Rekimoto, J.: MimiCook: a cooking assistant system with situated guidance. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI 2014), pp. 121–124 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hayashi, Y., Doman, K., Ide, I., Deguchi, D., Murase, H.: Automatic authoring of a domestic cooking video based on the description of cooking instructions. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Multimedia for Cooking and Eating Activities, CEA 2013, pp. 21–26 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chi, P.-Y., Chen, J.-H., Chu, H.-H., Lo, J.-L.: Enabling calorie-aware cooking in a smart kitchen. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 116–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Terrenghi, L., Hilliges, O., Butz, A.: Kitchen stories: sharing recipes with the living cookbook. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 11(5), 409–414 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neßelrath, R., Lu, C., Schulz, C.H., Frey, J., Alexandersson, J.: A gesture based system for context-sensitive interaction with smart homes. In: Wichert, R., Eberhardt, B. (eds.) Ambient Assisted Living. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18167-2_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nansen, B., Davis, H., Vetere, F., Skov, M., Paay, J., Kjeldskov, J.: Kitchen kinesics: situating gestural interaction within the social contexts of family cooking. In: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design, pp. 149–158 (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bonanni, L., Lee, C.-H., Selker, T.: Attention-based design of augmented reality interfaces. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing, CHI 2005, p. 1228 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aizawa, K., Funatomi, T., Yamakata, Y.: Summary for the workshop on smart technology for cooking and eating activities (CEA 2014). In: ACM Ubicomp Workshop on Smart Technology for Cooking and Eating, pp. 479–485 (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Paay, J., Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B.: Connecting in the kitchen: an empirical study of physical interactions while cooking together at home. In: CSCW 2015, pp. 276–287 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Isaku, T., Iba, T.: Creative CoCooking patterns: a pattern language for creative collaborative cooking. In: Proceedings for European Conference on Pattern Language of Programs (EuroPLoP 2015), pp. 1–17 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hassenzahl, M., Klapperich, H.: Convenient, clean, and efficient? The experiential costs of everyday automation. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 21–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mayring, P.: Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch./Forum Qual. Soc. Res., 1(2) (2000)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Laib, M., Burmester, M., Zeiner, K.M.: Erlebnispotenzialanalyse – Mit Systematik zu positiven Erlebnissen. In: Mensch und Computer 2017 – Usability Professionals, 10–13 September 2017, Regensburg (2017)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Burmester, M., Laib, M., Schippert, K., Zeiner, K., Fronemann, N., Krüger, A.E.: Vom Problemlösen hin zum Entwerfen von Smart Homes für positive Momente und mehr Wohlbefinden. Wiss. trifft Prax. 4, 38–48 (2016)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Desmet, P., Hassenzahl, M.: Towards happiness: possibility-driven design. In: Zacarias, M., de Oliveira, J.V. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective. SCI, vol. 396, pp. 3–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Design for Life. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina M. Zeiner
    • 1
  • Julian Henschel
    • 1
  • Katharina Schippert
    • 1
  • Kristin Haasler
    • 1
  • Magdalena Laib
    • 1
  • Michael Burmester
    • 1
  1. 1.Stuttgart Media UniversityStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations