Advertisement

Language, Speech, and Movement

  • Stanton B. GarnerJr.
Chapter
Part of the Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance book series (CSLP)

Abstract

This chapter (“Language, Speech, Movement”) considers the function of language and verbal performance in the kinesthetic interchange between actors and spectators. Drawing upon the work of cognitive scientists and linguists, it explores two ways that language and speech condition theatrical kinesthesis. The first is through utterance, the kinetic process by which the body moves to produce meaningful sound. The second is through language itself, which—grounded in the body’s sensorimotor capacities—carries its own, linguistically embodied modes of action. In addition to continuing the discussion of Harold Pinter’s The Homecoming begun in Chap.  4, this chapter includes discussions of Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, Shakespeare’s King Lear and Macbeth, and Complicite’s immersive theatre production The Encounter, with Simon McBurney.

Bibliography

  1. Artaud, Antonin. 1958. The Theatre and Its Double. Trans. Mary Caroline Richards. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
  2. Bolens, Guillemette. 2012. The Style of Gestures: Embodiment and Cognition in Literary Narrative. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boulenger, Véronique, Olaf Hauk, and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2009. Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Somatic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension. Cerebral Cortex 19 (8): 1905–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brecht, Bertolt. 1955. Mother Courage and Her Children. English version by Eric Bentley. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
  5. Buccino, G., L. Riggio, G. Melli, F. Binkofski, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti. 2005. Listening to Action-Related Sentences Modulates the Activity of the Motor System: A Combined TMS and Behavioral Study. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (3): 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Complicite and Simon McBurney. 2016. The Encounter. London: Nick Hern.Google Scholar
  7. de Boysson-Bardies, Bénédicte, Pierre Halle, Laurant Sagart, and Catherine Durand. 1989. A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Vowel Formants in Babbling. Journal of Child Language 16 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fadiga, Luciano, Laila Craighero, Giovanni Buccino, and Giacomo Rizzolatti. 2002. Speech Listening Specifically Modulates the Excitability of Tongue Muscles: A TMS Study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15 (2): 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garner, Stanton B., Jr. 1994. Bodied Spaces: Phenomenology and Performance in Contemporary Drama. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Home-Cook, George. 2015. Theatre and Aural Attention: Stretching Ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kemmerer, David. 2006. Action Verbs, Argument Structure Constructions, and the Mirror Neuron System. In Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, ed. Michael A. Arbib, 347–373. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kemp, Rick. 2012. Embodied Acting: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Performance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinney, Katherine. 2014. The Resonance of Brando’s Voice. Postmodern Culture 24: 3. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/589569. Accessed 20 July 2016.
  16. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Lecoq, Jacques. 2002. The Moving Body: Teaching Creative Theatre. Trans. David Bradby. Rev. ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  19. Liberman, Alvin M., and Ignatius G. Mattingly. 1985. The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised. Cognition 21 (1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liberman, Alvin M., and Doug H. Whalen. 2000. On the Relation of Speech to Language. Trends in Cognitive Science 4 (5): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lutterbie, John. 2011. Toward a General Theory of Acting: Cognitive Science and Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macbeth. 2004. Directed for Television by Philip Casson, Performances by Ian McKellan and Judi Dench. 1987. DVD. Santa Monica: Lionsgate.Google Scholar
  23. McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. McNeill, David, and Susan D. Duncan. 2000. Growth Points in Thinking-for-Speaking. In Language and Gesture, ed. David McNeill, 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meltzoff, Andew N. 2002. Elements of a Developmental Theory of Imitation. In The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases, ed. Andrew N. Meltzoff and Wolfgang Prinz, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. O’Neill, Eugene. 1998. Four Plays by Eugene O’Neill. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  28. Passarello, Elena. 2012. Let Me Clear My Throat. Louisville: Sarabande.Google Scholar
  29. Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2005. Brain Mechanisms Linking Language and Action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6 (7): 576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Luciano Fadiga. 2010. Active Perception: Sensorimotor Circuits as a Cortical Basis for Language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (5): 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shakespeare, William. 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J.J.M. Tobin, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  32. Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2011. The Primacy of Movement. Expanded second ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  33. Slobin, Dan I. 2000. Verbalized Events: A Dynamic Approach to Linguistic Relativity and Determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, ed. Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven, 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sophocles. 1982. The Three Theban Plays. Trans. Robert Fagles. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  35. States, Bert O. 1982. Standing on the Extreme Verge in King Lear and Other High Places. Georgia Review 36 (2): 417–425.Google Scholar
  36. Tribble, Evelyn B. 2011. Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watkins, K.E., A.P. Strafella, and T. Paus. 2003. Seeing and Hearing Speech Excites the Motor System Involved in Speech Production. Neurospsychologia 41 (8): 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, Tennessee. 1947. A Streetcar Named Desire. New York: Signet.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanton B. GarnerJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations