Advertisement

Movement, Difference, and Ability

  • Stanton B. GarnerJr.
Chapter
Part of the Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance book series (CSLP)

Abstract

This chapter (“Movement, Difference, Ability”) considers the issue of corporeal difference in phenomenological and cognitive accounts of movement and movement perception. Whose experience do we describe when we make generalizations about these phenomena, and what bodies authorize these accounts? Advocating a methodological practice that embraces divergence and a strategic use of experiential norms, it offers a phenomenological foundation for engaging what we know and fall short of knowing in the kinesthetic experiences of others. Central to this foundation is the dialectic relationships between Edmund Husserl’s concepts of I can and I cannot, which allows us to navigate the experiential terrains of ability and disability. The chapter concludes with an account of watching two integrated dance performances by Oakland’s AXIS Dance Company.

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AXIS Dance Company. Repertory. AXIS Dance Company website. http://www.axisdance.org/repertory/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.
  3. Canguilhem, Georges. 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. Trans. Carolyn R. Fawcett in collaboration with Robert S. Cohen. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
  4. Crossley, Nick. 2013. Habit and Habitus. Body and Society 19 (2–3): 136–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, Lennard. 2002. Bending over Backwards: Disability, Dismodermism, and Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Diedrich, Lisa. 2001. Breaking Down: A Phenomenology of Disability. Literature and Medicine 20 (2): 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
  8. Foley Sherman, Jon. 2016. A Strange Proximity: Stage Presence, Failure, and the Ethics of Attention. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, Erica. 2013. The ‘I cannot, but it can’ of Aesthetic Perception. In Moving Imagination: Explorations of Gesture and Inner Movement, ed. Helena De Preester, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill, Miriam Helen. 1985. Bound to the Environment: Towards a Phenomenology of Sightlessness. In Dwelling, Place and Environment, ed. David Seamon and Robert Mugerauer, 99–111. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hull, John M. 1990. Touching the Rock: An Experience of Blindness. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Book 2: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, Hanne. 2014. Husserl on Freedom and Reflection. In Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity and Values in Edmund Husserl, ed. Susi Ferrarello, 13–24. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  15. Kozel, Susan. 2007. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2015. Process Phenomenologies. In Performance and Phenomenology: Traditions and Transformations, ed. Maaike Bleeker, Jon Foley Sherman, and Eirini Nedelkopoulou, 54–74. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kuppers, Petra. 2017. Dancing Disabled: Phenomenology and Embodied Politics. In Oxford Handbook of Dance and Politics, ed. Rebekah J. Kowal, Gerald Siegmund, and Randy Martin, 267–281. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Linton, Simi. 1998. Disability Studies/Not Disability Studies. Disability & Society 13 (4): 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marotta, J.J., and M. Behrmann. 2004. Patient Schn: Has Goldstein and Gelb’s Case Withstood the Test of Time? Neuropsychologia 42 (5): 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martiny, Kristian Moltke. 2015. How to Develop a Phenomenological Model of Disability. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4): 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mauss, Marcel. 1979. Sociology and Psychology: Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. McCarroll, Sarah E. 2016. The Historical Body Map: Cultural Pressures on Embodied Cognition. In Theatre, Performance and Cognition: Languages, Bodies and Ecologies, ed. Rhonda Blair and Amy Cook, 241–258. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  23. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. 1964, ed. Claude Lefort. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Noland, Carrie. 2009. Agency and Embodiment: Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabinow, Paul. 1996. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rothfield, Philipa. 2005. Differentiating Phenomenology and Dance. Topoi 24 (1): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Salamon, Gayle. 2015. Passing Period: Gender, Aggression, and the Phenomenology of Walking. In Performance and Phenomenology: Traditions and Transformations, ed. Maaike Bleeker, Jon Foley Sherman, and Eirini Nedelkopoulou, 186–203. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Shildrick, Margrit. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sobchack, Vivian. 2005. Choreography for One, Two, and Three Legs (A Phenomenological Meditation in Movements). Topoi 24 (1): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stein, Edith. 1989. On the Problem of Empathy. 1917. 3rd. revised ed. Trans. Waltraut Stein. Vol. 3, The Collected Works of Edith Stein. Washington, DC: ICS.Google Scholar
  32. Straus, Erwin. 1966. The Upright Posture. Chapter in Phenomenological Psychology, 137–165. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Strukus, Wanda. 2011. Mining the Gap: Physically Integrated Performance and Kinesthetic Empathy. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 25 (2): 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taipale, Joona. 2012. Twofold Normality: Husserl and the Normative Relevance of Primary Constitution. Husserl Studies 28 (1): 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Toombs, S. Kay. 1995. The Lived Experience of Disability. Human Studies 18 (1): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weiss, Gail. 2017. The ‘Normal Abnormalities’ of Disability and Aging. In Feminist Phenomenology Futures, ed. Helen A. Fielding and Dorothea E. Olkowski, 203–217. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilshire, Bruce. 1982. Role Playing and Identity: The Limits of Theatre as Metaphor. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality. In Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory, 141–159. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1998. ‘Throwing Like a Girl’: Twenty Years Later. In Body and Flesh: A Philosophical Reader, ed. Donn Welton, 286–290. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanton B. GarnerJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations