Advertisement

PR Segment: Cardiac Implications

  • Silvia Cesini
  • Simone D’Agostino
  • Francesca Patani
  • Francesca Troiano
Chapter

Abstract

PR interval (measured from the initial P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex) reflects the time needed for an electrical impulse to be transmitted from the sinus node to the ventricles, so it is an integration of informations about different sites of the conduction system of the heart. To find a PR interval out of normal limits is not always a benign condition as previously believed. PR prolongation may not only underlie a major conduction disturbance (as in case 2), but it has also been related to the risk of atrial fibrillation (as in case 1); furthermore it may reflect different electrophysiological abnormalities, including atrial enlargement. A short PR interval instead has been shown to be an AF predictor and is linked to higher incidence of ischemic heart disease (as in case 3).

References

  1. 1.
    Dilaveris PE, Farbom P, Batchvarov V, et al. Circadian behavior of P-wave duration, P-wave area, and PR interval in healthy subjects. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001;6(2):92–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Josephson ME. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 93–113.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kwok CS, Rashid M, Beynon R, et al. Prolonged PR interval, first-degree heart block and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(9):672–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng M, Lu X, Huang J, et al. Electrocardiographic PR prolongation and atrial fibrillation risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(1):36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nielsen JB, Pietersen A, Graff C, et al. Risk of atrial fibrillation as a function of the electrocardiographic PR interval: results from the Copenhagen ECG Study. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(9):1249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iwasaki Y, Nishida K, Kato T, et al. Atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: implications for management. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2264–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan Y, Siu C, Yiu K, et al. Prolongation of PR interval is associated with endothelial dysfunction and activation of vascular repair in high-risk cardiovascular patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013;37(1):55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aro AL, Anttonen O, Kerola T, et al. Prognostic significance of prolonged PR interval in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(2):123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perez MV, Dewey FE, Marcus R, et al. Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2009;158(4):622–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okutucu S, Aytemir K, Oto A. P-wave dispersion: what we know till now? JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;5:1–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holmqvist F, et al. Clinical outcome as a function of the PR-interval- there is virtue in moderation: data from the Duke Databank for cardiovascular disease. Europace. 2015;17:978–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Issa ZF, Miller JM, Zipes DP. Clinical arrhythmology and electrophysiology: a companion to Braunwald’s heart disease. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waller BF, Gering LE, Branyas NA, et al. Anatomy, histology and pathology of the cardiac conduction system-part V. Clin Cardiol. 1993;16:565–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Jong S, van Veen TAB, van Rijen HVM, et al. Fibrosis and cardiac arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011;57:630–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rasmussen PV, et al. Electrocardiographic PR-interval duration and cardiovascular risk: results from the Copenhagen ECG study. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(5):674–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.02.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng S, Keyes MJ, et al. Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block. JAMA. 2009;301(24):2571–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crisel RK, Farzaneh-Far R, Na B, et al. First-degree atrioventricular block is associated with heart failure and death in persons with stable coronary artery disease: data from the Heart and Soul study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(15):1875–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magnani JW, Wang N, Nelson KP, et al. Electrocardiographic PR interval and adverse outcomes in older adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(1):84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knuiman M, Briffa T, et al. A cohort study examination of established and emerging risk factors for atrial fibrillation: the Busselton Health Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(3):181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kobayashi T, Watanabe M, Kokubo Y, et al. Prolonged PR interval is significantly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and stroke in a population-based cohort study. Circulation. 2014;130:A13451.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uhm JS, Shim J, et al. First-degree atrioventricular block is associated with advanced atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 2104;32(5):1115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Cesini
    • 1
  • Simone D’Agostino
    • 1
  • Francesca Patani
    • 1
  • Francesca Troiano
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinica di Cardiologia ed AritmologiaOspedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations