Contemporary Mediums and the Return of William James

  • Tadd Ruetenik


Two 1970s channelers claimed to be in touch with the spirit of William James. Their writings present an interesting version of James that they admit is partially their own construction. Demonic possession for them becomes something psychologically nuanced: a semi-conscious, creative blend of personalities rather than uncontrolled alternations of controlling personalities. Using the investigations of contemporary psychologist Gary Schwartz, the writings of James, and the writings of two prominent mediums claiming to be in contact with a post-mortem James, an analysis is made not only of the epistemological issues involved in demonic influence but also the ethical issues involved in therapeutic practice. The insights of two contemporary mediums—Allison DuBois and John Edward—are given both a charitable and skeptical reading.


  1. Bridgestock, Martin. 2008. Skeptical Ethics: What Should We Investigate? Skeptical Inquirer 32 (3): 35–39.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, Deborah. 2006. Ghost Hunters. New York: Perguin Press.Google Scholar
  3. DuBois, Allison. 2005. Don’t Kiss Them Goodbye. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2006. We are Their Heaven: Why the Dead Never Leave Us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Edward, John. 1998. One Last Time: A Psychic Medium Speaks to Those We Have Loved and Lost. New York: Berkeley Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  6. Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 1992. The Selected Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  7. James, William. 1960. William James and Psychical Research. Edited by Gardner Murphy and Robert Ballou. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1994. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2000a. Correspondence: Vol. 8. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  10. Merow, Katherine. 2008. But You Deceived Me! The Necessity of Deception in Investigation of the Paranormal. Skeptical Inquirer 32 (4): 44.Google Scholar
  11. Richardson, Robert D. 2006. William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Roach, Mary. 2005. Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Roberts, Jane. 1979. The Afterdeath Journal of an American Philosopher: The Worldview of William James. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Schwartz, Gary. 2002. The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2005. The Truth Behind Medium: Extraordinary Experiments with the Real Allison DuBois of NBC’s Medium and Other Remarkable Psychics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Sluhovsky, Moshe. 1996. A Divine Apparition of Demonic Possession? Female Agency and Church Authority in Demon Possession in Sixteenth-Century France. The Sixteenth Century Journal 27 (4): 1039–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, Susy. 1974. The Book of James. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1999. Ghost Writers in the Sky: More Communication from James. New York: Excel Press.Google Scholar
  19. South Park. 2002. Biggest Douche in the Universe. Season 6:15.Google Scholar
  20. Swedenborg. 2000. Heaven and Its Wonders and Hell: Drawn from Things Heard and Seen. West Chester, PA: Swedenborg Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Ward, Roger A. 2004. Conversion in American Philosophy: Exploring the Practice of Transformation. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Willke, Dr. and Mrs. 1973. Handbook on Abortion. Cincinnati: Hiltz Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  23. Wiseman, Richard, and Robert Morris. 1997. Deception and Self-Deception: Investigating Psychics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadd Ruetenik
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Ambrose UniversityDavenportUSA

Personalised recommendations