Advertisement

Eco-evolutionary Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Herbivores and Invasive Plants

  • Wei Huang
  • Evan Siemann
  • Jianqing Ding
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 234)

Abstract

Selection on plants imposed by herbivores can trigger adaptive evolution in growth, reproduction, and defense. Such evolutionary changes in plant traits in turn may affect herbivores and other organisms. These interdependent ecological processes and evolutionary changes have been demonstrated for plant–herbivore interactions aboveground. But, increasing evidence highlights the importance of belowground herbivores for plant performance and population dynamics and demonstrates complex interactions between above- and belowground herbivores. In this chapter, we explore eco-evolutionary dynamics of above- and belowground plant–herbivore interactions. We focus on invasive plants since many of them have novel herbivore assemblages in the introduced range, a setting in which plant traits may evolve and then exert new impacts on above- and belowground herbivores. The literature suggests that both above- and belowground herbivores drive changes in plant traits but that their effects are not simply additive since there is substantial variation in the effects of herbivores on plants. Furthermore, responses of herbivores to variation in plant traits cannot be predicted by feeding compartment, feeding mode, or diet breadth. Variation in plant traits is consistent with differences in herbivore loads, non-herbivore organisms, and abiotic stresses between native and introduced ranges. Therefore, without integration of herbivores in both above- and belowground compartments, it is hard to make accurate predictions of eco-evolutionary dynamics of plant–herbivore interactions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Takayuki Ohgushi, Susanne Wurst, and Scott Johnson for the invitation to contribute to the book “Aboveground and Belowground Community Ecology.” We are grateful for comments by Takayuki Ohgushi and two anonymous referees that improved the early version of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470447 to WH, 31370404 to JD), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y329351H03 to WH), and the Foreign Visiting Professorship of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2015VBA025 to ES).

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2005) Future directions in the study of induced plant responses to herbivory. Entomol Exp Appl 115:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA (2011) Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct Ecol 25:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal AA, Karban R (1999) Why induced defenses may be favored over constitutive strategies in plants. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 45–61Google Scholar
  4. Agrawal AA, Lau JA, Hambäck PA (2006) Community heterogeneity and the evolution of interactions between plants and insect herbivores. Q Rev Biol 81:349–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agrawal AA, Hastings AP, Johnson MTJ et al (2012) Insect herbivores drive real-time ecological and evolutionary change in plant populations. Science 338:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali JG, Agrawal AA (2012) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 17:293–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ando Y, Utsumi S, Ohgushi T (2010) Community structure of insect herbivores on introduced and native Solidago plants in Japan. Entomol Exp Appl 136:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arimura G, Kost C, Boland W (2005) Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences. BBA-Mol Cell Biol L 1734:91–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arredondo JT, Johnson DA (2011) Allometry of root branching and its relationship to root morphological and functional traits in three range grasses. J Exp Bot 62:5581–5594PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bezemer TM, Harvey JA, Cronin JT (2014) Response of native insect communities to invasive plants. Annu Rev Entomol 59:119–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biere A, Goverse A (2016) Plant-mediated systemic interactions between pathogens, parasitic nematodes, and herbivores above- and belowground. Annu Rev Phytopathol 54:499–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blossey B (1993) Herbivory below ground and biological weed control: life history of a root-boring weevil on Purple loosestrife. Oecologia 94:380–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blossey B, Hunt-Joshi TR (2003) Belowground herbivory by insects: influence on plants and aboveground herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol 48:521–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blumenthal DM, Hufbauer RA (2007) Increased plant size in exotic populations: a common-garden test with 14 invasive species. Ecology 88:2758–2765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bossdorf O, Schroder S, Prati D et al (2004) Palatability and tolerance to simulated herbivory in native and introduced populations of Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 91:856–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L et al (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burghardt KT, Tallamy DW (2013) Plant origin asymmetrically impacts feeding guilds and life stages driving community structure of herbivorous arthropods. Divers Distrib 19:1553–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caño L, Escarré J, Vrieling K et al (2009) Palatability to a generalist herbivore, defence and growth of invasive and native Senecio species: testing the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis. Oecologia 159:95–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carrillo J, Siemann E (2016) A native plant competitor mediates the impact of above- and belowground damage on an invasive tree. Ecol Appl 26:2060–2071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrillo J, Wang Y, Ding J et al (2012a) Decreased indirect defense in the invasive tree, Triadica sebifera. Plant Ecol 213:945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carrillo J, Wang Y, Ding J et al (2012b) Induction of extrafloral nectar depends on herbivore type in invasive and native Chinese tallow seedlings. Basic Appl Ecol 13:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carrillo J, McDermott D, Siemann E (2014) Loss of specificity: native but not invasive populations of Triadica sebifera vary in tolerance to different herbivores. Oecologia 174:863–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chun YJ, van Kleunen M, Dawson W (2010) The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. Ecol Lett 13:937–946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cipollini D, Heil M (2010) Costs and benefits of induced resistance to herbivores and pathogens in plants. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 5:1–25Google Scholar
  26. Cipollini D, Mbagwu J, Barto K et al (2005) Expression of constitutive and inducible chemical defenses in native and invasive populations of Alliaria petiolata. J Chem Ecol 31:1255–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cripps MG, Schwarzländer M, McKenney JL et al (2006) Biogeographical comparison of the arthropod herbivore communities associated with Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges. J Biogeogr 33:2107–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davis DR, Fox MS, Hazen RF (2013) Systematics and biology of Caloptilia triadicae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), a new species of leaf-mining moth of the invasive Chinese tallow tree (Triadica sebifera (L.) Euphorbiaceae). J Lepid Soc 67:281–290Google Scholar
  29. Dawson W, Schrama M (2016) Identifying the role of soil microbes in plant invasions. J Ecol 104:1211–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doorduin L, Vrieling K (2011) A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochemistry 10:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eigenbrode S, Andreas J, Cripps M et al (2008) Induced chemical defenses in invasive plants: a case study with Cynoglossum officinale L. Biol Invasions 10:1373–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Erb M, Ton J, Degenhardt J et al (2008) Interactions between arthropod-induced aboveground and belowground defenses in plants. Plant Physiol 146:867–874PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Erb M, Flors V, Karlen D et al (2009) Signal signature of aboveground-induced resistance upon belowground herbivory in maize. Plant J 59:292–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Erwin AC, Geber MA, Agrawal AA (2013) Specific impacts of two root herbivores and soil nutrients on plant performance and insect-insect interactions. Oikos 122:1746–1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Erwin AC, Züst T, Ali JG et al (2014) Above-ground herbivory by red milkweed beetles facilitates above- and below-ground conspecific insects and reduces fruit production in common milkweed. J Ecol 102:1038–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Felker-Quinn E, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK (2013) Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA). Ecol Evol 3:739–751PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Feng YL, Lei YB, Wang RF et al (2009) Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1853–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fornoni J (2011) Ecological and evolutionary implications of plant tolerance to herbivory. Funct Ecol 25:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fukano Y, Yahara T (2012) Changes in defense of an alien plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia before and after the invasion of a native specialist enemy Ophraella communa. PLoS One 7:e49114PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fussmann GF, Loreau M, Abrams PA (2007) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct Ecol 21:465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gard B, Bretagnolle F, Dessaint F et al (2013) Invasive and native populations of common ragweed exhibit strong tolerance to foliar damage. Basic Appl Ecol 14:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gerber E, Hinz HL, Blossey B (2007) Impact of the belowground herbivore and potential biological control agent, Ceutorhynchus scrobicollis, on Alliaria petiolata performance. Biol Control 42:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gruntman M, Segev U, Glauser G et al (2017) Evolution of plant defences along an invasion chronosequence: defence is lost due to enemy release – but not forever. J Ecol 105:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harvey JA, Bukovinszky T, van der Putten WH (2010) Interactions between invasive plants and insect herbivores: a plea for a multitrophic perspective. Biol Conserv 143:2251–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heil M (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178:41–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heil M (2011) Nectar: generation, regulation and ecological functions. Trends Plant Sci 16:191–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heil M, Karban R (2010) Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. Trends Ecol Evol 25:137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hendry AP (2016) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  50. Hol WHG, Macel M, van Veen JA et al (2004) Root damage and aboveground herbivory change concentration and composition of pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Senecio jacobaea. Basic Appl Ecol 5:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huang W, Ding J (2016) Effects of generalist herbivory on resistance and resource allocation by the invasive plant, Phytolacca americana. Insect Sci 23:191–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huang W, Siemann E, Wheeler GS et al (2010) Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant. J Ecol 98:1157–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huang W, Wheeler GS, Purcell MF et al (2011) The host range and impact of Bikasha collaris (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a promising candidate agent for biological control of Chinese tallow, Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States. Biol Control 56:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Huang W, Carrillo J, Ding J et al (2012a) Interactive effects of herbivory and competition intensity determine invasive plant performance. Oecologia 170:373–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Huang W, Carrillo J, Ding J et al (2012b) Invader partitions ecological and evolutionary responses to above- and belowground herbivory. Ecology 93:2343–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Huang W, Siemann E, Yang X et al (2013) Facilitation and inhibition: changes in plant nitrogen and secondary metabolites mediate interactions between above-ground and below-ground herbivores. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 280:20131318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Huang W, Siemann E, Xiao L et al (2014) Species-specific defence responses facilitate conspecifics and inhibit heterospecifics in above-belowground herbivore interactions. Nat Commun 5:4851PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Huang W, Siemann E, Carrillo J et al (2015) Below-ground herbivory limits induction of extrafloral nectar by above-ground herbivores. Ann Bot 115:841–846PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Huang W, Robert CAM, Hervé MR et al (2017) A mechanism for sequence specificity in plant-mediated interactions between herbivores. New Phytol 214:169–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Huber M, Bont Z, Fricke J et al (2016a) A below-ground herbivore shapes root defensive chemistry in natural plant populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 283:20160285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Huber M, Epping J, Schulze Gronover C et al (2016b) A latex metabolite benefits plant fitness under root herbivore attack. PLoS Biol 14:e1002332PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Astigueta MS et al (2013) No time for candy: passionfruit (Passiflora edulis) plants down-regulate damage-induced extra floral nectar production in response to light signals of competition. Oecologia 173:213–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Johnson SN, Rasmann S (2015) Root-feeding insects and their interactions with organisms in the rhizosphere. Annu Rev Entomol 60:517–535PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Johnson SN, Hawes C, Karley AJ (2009) Reappraising the role of plant nutrients as mediators of interactions between root- and foliar-feeding insects. Funct Ecol 23:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Johnson SN, Clark KE, Hartley SE et al (2012) Aboveground-belowground herbivore interactions. A meta-analysis. Ecology 93:2208–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jones IM, Koptur S (2015) Quantity over quality: light intensity, but not red/far-red ratio, affects extrafloral nectar production in Senna mexicana var. chapmanii. Ecol Evol 5:4108–4114PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Joshi S, Tielbörger K (2012) Response to enemies in the invasive plant Lythrum salicaria is genetically determined. Ann Bot 110:1403–1410PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Joshi J, Vrieling K (2005) The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: Incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol Lett 8:704–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kafle D, Krähmer A, Naumann A et al (2014) Genetic variation of the host plant species matters for interactions with above- and belowground herbivores. Insects 5:651–667PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kant MR, Jonckheere W, Knegt B et al (2015) Mechanisms and ecological consequences of plant defence induction and suppression in herbivore communities. Ann Bot 115:1015–1051PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A et al (2008a) Physiological integration of roots and shoots in plant defense strategies links above- and belowground herbivory. Ecol Lett 11:841–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A et al (2008b) Constitutive and induced defenses to herbivory in above- and belowground plant tissues. Ecology 89:392–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Karban R (2011) The ecology and evolution of induced resistance against herbivores. Funct Ecol 25:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Karban R, Myers JH (1989) Induced plant-responses to herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Karban R, Yang LH, Edwards KF (2014) Volatile communication between plants that affects herbivory: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 17:44–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kempel A, Schädler M, Chrobock T et al (2011) Tradeoffs associated with constitutive and induced plant resistance against herbivory. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5685–5689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kessler A, Heil M (2011) The multiple faces of indirect defences and their agents of natural selection. Funct Ecol 25:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Knochel D, Monson N, Seastedt T (2010) Additive effects of aboveground and belowground herbivores on the dominance of spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe). Oecologia 164:701–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lankau RA (2007) Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defense. New Phytol 175:176–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Li X, Guo W, Siemann E et al (2016) Plant genotypes affect aboveground and belowground herbivore interactions by changing chemical defense. Oecologia 182:1107–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Liao Z-Y, Zhang R, Barclay GF et al (2013) Differences in competitive ability between plants from nonnative and native populations of a tropical invader relates to adaptive responses in abiotic and biotic environments. PLoS One 8:e71767PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lin T, Doorduin L, Temme A et al (2015a) Enemies lost: parallel evolution in structural defense and tolerance to herbivory of invasive Jacobaea vulgaris. Biol Invasions 17:2339–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lin T, Klinkhamer PGL, Vrieling K (2015b) Parallel evolution in an invasive plant: effect of herbivores on competitive ability and regrowth of Jacobaea vulgaris. Ecol Lett 18:668–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mathur V, Wagenaar R, Caissard J-C et al (2013) A novel indirect defence in Brassicaceae: structure and function of extrafloral nectaries in Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Environ 36:528–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Meyer G, Clare R, Weber E (2005) An experimental test of the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis in goldenrod, Solidago gigantea. Oecologia 144:299–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19:417–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mundim FM, Alborn HT, Vieira-Neto EHM et al (2017) A whole-plant perspective reveals unexpected impacts of above- and belowground herbivores on plant growth and defense. Ecology 98:70–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL (2007) The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:541–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Oduor AMO, Lankau RA, Strauss SY et al (2011) Introduced Brassica nigra populations exhibit greater growth and herbivore resistance but less tolerance than native populations in the native range. New Phytol 191:536–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ohgushi T (2016) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of plant–herbivore communities: incorporating plant phenotypic plasticity. Curr Opin Insect Sci 14:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Orians CM, Ward D (2010) Evolution of plant defenses in nonindigenous environments. Annu Rev Entomol 55:439–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ostonen I, Püttsepp Ü, Biel C et al (2007) Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosyst 141:426–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Parker JD, Hay ME (2005) Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol Lett 8:959–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pattison RR, Mack RN (2008) Potential distribution of the invasive tree Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States: evaluating CLIMEX predictions with field trials. Glob Chang Biol 14:813–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pearse IS, Altermatt F (2013) Predicting novel trophic interactions in a non-native world. Ecol Lett 16:1088–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pelletier F, Garant D, Hendry AP (2009) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1483–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pierre PS, Dugravot S, Cortesero A-M et al (2012) Broccoli and turnip plants display contrasting responses to belowground induction by Delia radicum infestation and phytohormone applications. Phytochemistry 73:42–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Poelman EH, Kessler A (2016) Keystone herbivores and the evolution of plant defenses. Trends Plant Sci 21:477–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Poelman EH, Gols R, Snoeren TAL et al (2011) Indirect plant-mediated interactions among parasitoid larvae. Ecol Lett 14:670–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Postma JA, Schurr U, Fiorani F (2014) Dynamic root growth and architecture responses to limiting nutrient availability: linking physiological models and experimentation. Biotechnol Adv 32:53–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Prior KM, Powell THQ, Joseph AL et al (2015) Insights from community ecology into the role of enemy release in causing invasion success: the importance of native enemy effects. Biol Invasions 17:1283–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rasmann S, Agrawal AA (2008) In defense of roots: a research agenda for studying plant resistance to belowground herbivory. Plant Physiol 146:875–880PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rasmann S, Turlings TCJ (2007) Simultaneous feeding by aboveground and belowground herbivores attenuates plant-mediated attraction of their respective natural enemies. Ecol Lett 10:926–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Robert CAM, Erb M, Duployer M et al (2012) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles mediate host selection by a root herbivore. New Phytol 194:1061–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rogers WE, Siemann E (2005) Herbivory tolerance and compensatory differences in native and invasive ecotypes of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum). Plant Ecol 181:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rogers WE, Siemann E, Lankau RA (2003) Damage induced production of extrafloral nectaries in native and invasive seedlings of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum). Am Midl Nat 149:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sakata Y, Yamasaki M, Isagi Y et al (2014) An exotic herbivorous insect drives the evolution of resistance in the exotic perennial herb Solidago altissima. Ecology 95:2569–2578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2001) Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecol Lett 4:514–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003a) Herbivory, disease, recruitment limitation, and success of alien and native tree species. Ecology 84:1489–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003b) Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecol Appl 13:1503–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003c) Reduced resistance of invasive varieties of the alien tree Sapium sebiferum to a generalist herbivore. Oecologia 135:451–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Siemann E, Rogers WE, DeWalt SJ (2006) Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:2763–2769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Siemann E, DeWalt SJ, Zou J et al (2017) An experimental test of the EICA hypothesis in multiple ranges: invasive populations outperform those from the native range independent of insect herbivore suppression. Ann Bot Plants plw087Google Scholar
  116. Singh A, Braun J, Decker E et al (2014) Plant genetic variation mediates an indirect ecological effect between belowground earthworms and aboveground aphids. BMC Ecol 14:25PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Soler R, Harvey JA, Kamp AFD et al (2007) Root herbivores influence the behaviour of an aboveground parasitoid through changes in plant-volatile signals. Oikos 116:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Soler R, Erb M, Kaplan I (2013) Long distance root-shoot signalling in plant-insect community interactions. Trends Plant Sci 18:149–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tanner RA, Varia S, Eschen R et al (2013) Impacts of an invasive non-native annual weed, Impatiens glandulifera, on above- and below-ground invertebrate communities in the United Kingdom. PLoS One 8:e67271PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Uesugi A, Kessler A (2016) Herbivore release drives parallel patterns of evolutionary divergence in invasive plant phenotypes. J Ecol 104:876–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Utsumi S (2011) Eco-evolutionary dynamics in herbivorous insect communities mediated by induced plant responses. Popul Ecol 53:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. van Dam NM (2009) Belowground herbivory and plant defenses. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. van der Meijden E (1996) Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomol Exp Appl 80:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, de Ruiter PC et al (2009) Empirical and theoretical challenges in aboveground – belowground ecology. Oecologia 161:1–14PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. van Driesche RG, Carruthers RI, Center T et al (2010) Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems. Biol Control 54(Suppl 1):S2–S33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. van Geem M, Gols R, van Dam NM et al (2013) The importance of aboveground-belowground interactions on the evolution and maintenance of variation in plant defence traits. Front Plant Sci 4:431PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Vestergård M, Rønn R, Ekelund F (2015) Above-belowground interactions govern the course and impact of biological invasions. AoB Plants 7:plv025PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wang Y, Huang W, Siemann E et al (2011) Lower resistance and higher tolerance of host plants: biocontrol agents reach high densities but exert weak control. Ecol Appl 21:729–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wang Y, Siemann E, Wheeler GS et al (2012) Genetic variation in anti-herbivore chemical defences in an invasive plant. J Ecol 100:894–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wang Y, Carrillo J, Siemann E et al (2013) Specificity of extrafloral nectar induction by herbivores differs among native and invasive populations of tallow tree. Ann Bot 112:751–756PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wurst S, Dam N, Monroy F et al (2008) Intraspecific variation in plant defense alters effects of root herbivores on leaf chemistry and aboveground herbivore damage. J Chem Ecol 34:1360–1367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zhang KD, Lin YT (1994) Chinese tallow. China Forestry Press, Beijing (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  134. Zheng H, Wu Y, Ding J et al (2005) Invasive plants established in the United States that are found in Asia and their associated natural enemies. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, MorgantownGoogle Scholar
  135. Zou JW, Rogers WE, Siemann E (2008a) Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum. Biol Invasions 10:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Zou JW, Siemann E, Rogers WE et al (2008b) Decreased resistance and increased tolerance to native herbivores of the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum. Ecography 31:663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Züst T, Heichinger C, Grossniklaus U et al (2012) Natural enemies drive geographic variation in plant defenses. Science 338:116–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Evan Siemann
    • 3
  • Jianqing Ding
    • 4
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Aquatic Plant and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Institute of Plant SciencesUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of BiosciencesRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  4. 4.School of Life SciencesHenan UniversityKaifengChina

Personalised recommendations