Interaction of Distant and Local Users in a Collaborative Virtual Environment

  • Adrian H. HoppeEmail author
  • Roland Reeb
  • Florian van de Camp
  • Rainer Stiefelhagen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10909)


Virtual Reality enables a new form of collaboration. It allows users to work together in the same virtual room regardless of their actual physical location. However, it is unclear which effect the physical location of the user has on task performance, the feeling of presence or immersion. We compared the collaboration of two users in the same local room and in remote rooms on the basis of a knowledge-transfer task. An instructor indicated different virtual objects using three different pointing gestures and a trainee selected the highlighted object. The results of a 28 participant user study show that the performance of the gestures in the local and remote setup is equal, according to NASA-TLX, rankings and time. Users feel equally co-present and tend to prefer the remote collaboration. The data presented in this paper shows that VR collaboration in a virtual room is independent from the physical location of the participants. This allows the development of VR applications without special consideration of the user’s location. VR systems can use the advantages of a remote collaboration, like faster reaction times, no travel expenses and no user collision, or of local collaboration, e.g. direct contact between users.


  1. 1.
    Arthur, K., et al.: Designing and building the PIT: a head-tracked stereo workspace for two users. In: 2nd International Immersive Projection Technology Workshop, pp. 11–12 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, S., et al.: Immersive group-to-group telepresence. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(4), 616–625 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benford, S., et al.: Collaborative virtual environments. Commun. ACM 44(7), 79–85 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowman, D.A., et al.: An introduction to 3-D user interface design. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 10(1), 96–108 (2001). ISSN 1054-7460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, J.: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1), 155 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerhard, M., Moore, D.J., Hobbs, D.J.: Continuous presence in collaborative virtual environments: towards a hybrid avatar-agent model for user representation. In: de Antonio, A., Aylett, R., Ballin, D. (eds.) IVA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2190, pp. 137–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kranstedt, A., et al.: Measuring and reconstructing pointing in visual contexts. In: Proceedings of the Brandial, pp. 82–89 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., Kageki, N.: The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(2), 98–100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poupyrev, I., et al.: Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 17, pp. 41–52. Wiley Online Library (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roth, D., et al.: Avatar realism and social interaction quality in virtual reality. In: 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 277–278.
  11. 11.
    Salzmann, H., Jacobs, J., Froehlich, B.: Collaborative interaction in co-located two-user scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 15th Joint Virtual Reality Eurographics Conference on Virtual Environments, JVRC 2009, pp. 85–92. Eurographics Association, Lyon (2009). ISBN 978-3-905674-20-0.
  12. 12.
    Steed, A., Schroeder, R.: Collaboration in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. In: Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., IJsselsteijn, W., Schaevitz, R. (eds.) Immersed in Media, pp. 263–282. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szalavári, Z., et al.: Studierstube: an environment for collaboration in augmented reality. Virtual Reality 3(1), 37–48 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wingrave, C.A., Bowman, D.A., Ramakrishnan, N.: Towards preferences in virtual environment interfaces. In: EGVE, vol. 2, pp. 63–72 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian H. Hoppe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roland Reeb
    • 1
  • Florian van de Camp
    • 2
  • Rainer Stiefelhagen
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer IOSBKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations