Advertisement

Clinical Research Participation

  • Ricarda Tomlin
Chapter
Part of the Clinical Gastroenterology book series (CG)

Abstract

Advancements in clinical research depend on the willingness of patients to become study participants, especially in rare diseases such as Wilson disease. However, participation is always voluntary, and anyone considering joining a study should be given the chance to review all aspects of the study before coming to a decision. Primary care physicians (PCPs) can play a vital role in connecting patients with research opportunities and serve as a resource when patients make decisions about study participation. The purpose of this chapter is to provide PCPs and patients with an overview of clinical research (including clinical trials and patient registries), information on rights and responsibilities, and a map to prepare for the informed consent process. Clinical research should be considered a partnership between participants and investigators aimed at the common goal of improving the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease.

Keywords

Clinical research Study participation Wilson disease Clinical trials Patient registries Informed consent 

References

  1. 1.
    Griggs RC, Batshaw M, Dunkle M, et al. Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richesson R, Vehik K. Patient registries: utility, validity and inference. In: Posada de la Paz M, Groft S, editors. Rare diseases epidemiology. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol. 686. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansson M, Lochmüller H, Riess O, et al. The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:1553–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grady C, Eckstein L, Berkman B, et al. Broad consent for research with biological samples: workshop conclusions. Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(9):34–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda: The Commission; 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Code of Federal Regulations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2018.
  7. 7.
    Crane S, Broome M. Understanding ethical issues of research participation from the perspective of participating children and adolescents: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2017;14(3):200–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Resnik DB, Ness E. Participants’ responsibilities in clinical research. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(12):746–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale University, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery/TransplantNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations