Advertisement

Co-designing for Co-listening: Conceptualizing Young People’s Social and Music-Listening Practices

  • Michael Stewart
  • Javier Tibau
  • Deborah Tatar
  • Steve Harrison
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10913)

Abstract

Social networking applications have come to dominate the attention of technology-users of all ages, and are seen as the quintessential application of social media. They promise to connect us to our friends and family, but there are growing concerns over their ability to achieve this. We are interested in the potential of technology to connect people, but we question the approach of social networking apps and sites. Perhaps the only activity that competes with social networks for occupying so much of people’s time is music-listening. Listening to music on personal devices is one of the most wide-spread forms of human-computer interaction. It also provides opportunities that could be characterized, positively, as privacy or, negatively, as isolation. To better understand the design space of people listening to music and their sociality, we examined the attitudes and practices of 26 semi-rural young people (9–15 years old) in the U.S. who are too young to drive and therefore cannot congregate at-will. Our study utilized semi-structured interviews, a design charrette, and user-testing of Colisten, our functional prototype. We found that the youth do not currently engage in widespread co-listening or even in the use of music recommendation systems. Indications are that the lack of co-listening is due to design gaps in sharing features rather than lack of interest. As one young person explained, co-listening would be “…more like a social thing, rather than ‘I want to listen to music’, more like, ‘I want to hang out with my friend and listen to music…’”. We present emergent design dimensions detailing how this population thinks about sociality and sharing media.

References

  1. 1.
    Turkle, S.: Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart, M., Tatar, D., Harrison, S.R.: Background, slow, and inattentive interaction: togetherness over connectedness. In: Designing Against the Status Quo Workshop of Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Brisbane (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stewart, M., Tatar, D., Harrison, S.R.: Sharing, communication, and music listening: a diary study of technology use by pre-teens and adolescents. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS 2016). IEEE, Orlando (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spotify Press: Spotify – About. https://press.spotify.com/us/about/
  5. 5.
    Karp, H.: Apple Music’s Long Game: Why Jimmy Iovine Thinks They’re “Not Even Close” to Success With Streaming. https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/magazine-feature/7980919/jimmy-iovine-zane-lowe-larry-jackson-interview-billboard-cover-story-2017
  6. 6.
    Mainwaring, Scott D., Anderson, Ken, Chang, Michele F.: Living for the global city: mobile kits, urban interfaces, and ubicomp. In: Beigl, M., Intille, S., Rekimoto, J., Tokuda, H. (eds.) UbiComp 2005. LNCS, vol. 3660, pp. 269–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11551201_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brinegar, J., Capra, R.: Managing music across multiple devices and computers. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, pp. 489–495. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Voida, A., Grinter, R.E., Ducheneaut, N., Edwards, W.K., Newman, M.W.: Listening in: practices surrounding iTunes music sharing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 191–200. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lenz, E., Diefenbach, S., Hassenzahl, M., Lienhard, S.: Mo. Shared music, shared moment. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, pp. 736–741. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seeburger, J., Foth, M., Tjondronegoro, D.: The sound of music: sharing song selections between collocated strangers in public urban places. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 34:1–34:10. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirk, D.S., Durrant, A., Wood, G., Leong, T.W., Wright, P.: Understanding the sociality of experience in mobile music listening with pocketsong. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 50–61. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arnett, J.J.: Adolescents’ uses of media for self-socialization. J. Youth Adolesc. 24, 519–533 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boer, D., Fischer, R., Strack, M., Bond, M.H., Lo, E., Lam, J.: How shared preferences in music create bonds between people: values as the missing link. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37, 1159–1171 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schafer, T., Sedlmeier, P.: From the functions of music to music preference. Psychol. Music 37, 279–300 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Selfhout, M.H.W., Branje, S.J.T., ter Bogt, T.F.M., Meeus, W.H.J.: The role of music preferences in early adolescents’ friendship formation and stability. J. Adolesc. 32, 95–107 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lamont, A., Hargreaves, D.J., Marshall, N.A., Tarrant, M.: Young people’s music in and out of school. Br. J. Music Educ. 20, 229–241 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    North, A.C., Hargreaves, D.J., O’Neill, S.A.: The importance of music to adolescents. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70, 255 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meurer, J., Stein, M., Randall, D., Rohde, M., Wulf, V.: Social dependency and mobile autonomy: supporting older adults’ mobility with ridesharing ICT. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1923–1932 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grinter, R.E., Palen, L., Eldridge, M.: Chatting with teenagers: considering the place of chat technologies in teen life. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 13, 423–447 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ling, R.: The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leong, T.W., Wright, P.C.: Revisiting social practices surrounding music. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 951–960. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hassenzahl, M., Heidecker, S., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Hillmann, U.: All you need is love: current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 19, 1–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strong, R., Gaver, B.: Feather, scent and shaker: supporting simple intimacy. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 29–30 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C.: Sharing conversation and sharing life: video conferencing in the home. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 655–658. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., Blose, A.: Family portals: connecting families through a multifamily media space. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1205–1214 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lottridge, D., Masson, N., Mackay, W.: Sharing empty moments: design for remote couples. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2329–2338 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buhler, T., Neustaedter, C., Hillman, S.: How and why teenagers use video chat. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 759–768 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Greenberg, S., Neustaedter, C.: Shared living, experiences, and intimacy over video chat in long distance relationships. In: Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., Sellen, A. (eds.) Connecting Families, pp. 37–53. Springer, London (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4192-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C., Kurtz, A.F.: The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2361–2370 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muntean, R., Neustaedter, C., Hennessy, K.: Synchronous yoga and meditation over distance using video chat. In: Proceedings of the 41st Graphics Interface Conference, pp. 187–194. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Brien, S., Mueller, F.F.: Jogging the distance. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 523–526 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grinter, R.E., Palen, L.: Instant messaging in teen life. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 21–30. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Woźniak, P., Knaving, K., Björk, S., Fjeld, M.: RUFUS: remote supporter feedback for long-distance runners. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 115–124. ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sharon, S.: The Stewards of A Disappearing Faith — And 10,000 Songs (2016)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tarrant, M., North, A.C., Hargreaves, D.J.: English and American adolescents’ reasons for listening to music. Psychol. Music 28, 166–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., Davies, M.: Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 343–350. ACM, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Druin, A.: The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 21, 1–25 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spotify Inc.,: Spotify Developer Resources. https://developer.spotify.com/
  40. 40.
    North, A.C., Hargreaves, D.J., Hargreaves, J.J.: Uses of music in everyday life. Music Percept. Interdiscip. J. 22, 41–77 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Stewart
    • 1
  • Javier Tibau
    • 2
  • Deborah Tatar
    • 2
  • Steve Harrison
    • 2
  1. 1.James Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Tech.BlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations