Advertisement

Stay Connected and Keep Motivated: Modeling Activity Level of Exercise in an Online Fitness Community

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10914)

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a growing popularity of activity tracking applications. Previously work has focused on three major types of social interaction features in such applications: cooperation, competition and community. Such features motivate users to be more active in exercise and stay within the track of positive behavior change. Online fitness communities such as Strava encourage users to connect to peers and provide a rich set of social interaction features. Utilizing a large-scale behavioral trace data set, this work aims to analyze the dynamics of online fitness behaviors and network subscription as well as the relationship between them. Our results indicate that activeness of fitness behaviors not only has seasonal variations, but also vary by user group and how well users are connected in an online fitness community. These results provide important implications for studies on network-based health and design of application features for health promotion.

Keywords

Fitness behaviors Social interaction Event history analysis Online fitness communities Social media Behavioral traces 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This material is based upon work supported by an Information School Strategic Research Award, University of Washington and the Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Minnesota.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahtinen, A., Isomursu, M., Mukhtar, M., Mäntyjärvi, J., Häkkilä, J., Blom, J.: Designing social features for mobile and ubiquitous wellness applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, p. 12. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, Y., Pu, P.: Healthytogether: exploring social incentives for mobile fitness applications. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Chinese CHI, pp. 25–34. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wing, R.R., Jeffery, R.W.: Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67(1), 132 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulik, J.A., Mahler, H.I.: Social support and recovery from surgery. Health Psychol. 8(2), 221 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dishman, R.K., Sallis, J.F., Orenstein, D.R.: The determinants of physical activity and exercise. Public Health Rep. 100(2), 158 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Centola, D., van de Rijt, A.: Choosing your network: social preferences in an online health community. Soc. Sci. Med. 125, 19–31 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    King, A.C., Glanz, K., Patrick, K.: Technologies to measure and modify physical activity and eating environments. Am. J. Prev. Med. 48(5), 630–638 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J.: “working out for likes”: an empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 333–347 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stragier, J., Abeele, M.V., Mechant, P., De Marez, L.: Understanding persistence in the use of online fitness communities: comparing novice and experienced users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 34–42 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Althoff, T.: Population-scale pervasive health. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 16(4), 75–79 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prince, S.A., Adamo, K.B., Hamel, M.E., Hardt, J., Gorber, S.C., Tremblay, M.: A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 5(1), 56 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., Sailer, L.: The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 13, 495–517 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strava, Strava just hit a huge activity milestone (2017). http://womensrunning.competitor.com/2017/05/news/strava-one-billion-activities_75359
  14. 14.
    Foster, D., Linehan, C., Kirman, B., Lawson, S., James, G.: Motivating physical activity at work: using persuasive social media for competitive step counting. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 111–116. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cavallo, D.N., Tate, D.F., Ries, A.V., Brown, J.D., DeVellis, R.F., Ammerman, A.S.: A social media-based physical activity intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43(5), 527–532 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Consolvo, S., McDonald, D.W., Toscos, T., Chen, M.Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., et al.: Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1797–1806. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lister, C., West, J.H., Cannon, B., Sax, T., Brodegard, D.: Just a fad? gamification in health and fitness apps. JMIR Serious Games 2(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    West, J.H., Hall, P.C., Hanson, C.L., Barnes, M.D., Giraud-Carrier, C., Barrett, J.: There’s an app for that: content analysis of paid health and fitness apps. J. Med. Int. Res. 14(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campbell, T., Ngo, B., Fogarty, J.: Game design principles in everyday fitness applications. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 249–252. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi, G., Chung, H.: Applying the technology acceptance model to social networking sites (sns): impact of subjective norm and social capital on the acceptance of sns. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 29(10), 619–628 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 457–466. ACM (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information SchoolUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Sociology, School of Statistics, and Minnesota Population CenterUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Information School, Department of Sociology, Center for Statistics and the Social SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations